Review Journal Articles From The GCU Library On Topic Select

Review Journal Articles from the GCU Library on Topic Selected for the Term Paper

For this assignment, you are tasked with reviewing journal articles from the Grand Canyon University (GCU) library related to your chosen topic for your upcoming term paper. Your goal is to select four to five peer-reviewed journal articles on this topic, analyze them, and complete an annotated reference table. This table will serve as a foundational resource for creating your reference page for the final research paper due in Topic 7.

The process involves thoroughly examining scholarly sources, summarizing key points, evaluating their credibility, and explaining their relevance to your research. You will need to access the GCU library, utilize keyword searches, and apply filtering techniques to find credible, peer-reviewed journal articles. Adequate documentation of your search process and articulating how each source informs your research are essential components of this assignment.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment of reviewing journal articles from the GCU library on a selected topic is a crucial step in preparing a comprehensive and credible research paper. This process involves selecting four to five peer-reviewed articles, analyzing their content, and documenting each in an annotated reference table. This table not only aids in organizing sources but also provides foundational evidence supporting the research argument and facilitates the development of an accurate reference page.

To begin, selecting relevant, peer-reviewed articles from credible academic databases within the GCU library is essential. This involves strategic keyword searches, refinement using filters such as peer-reviewed status, publication date, and subject relevance. Using specific search terms tailored to the research topic improves the quality and pertinence of the sources. For example, if the research focus is on social justice, keywords such as “social justice,” “racial equality,” or “educational equity” combined with Boolean operators like AND/OR can generate targeted results.

Once suitable articles are identified, critical reading and analysis follow. This involves summarizing each article’s main purpose, methodology, findings, and implications in approximately 50 words. Furthermore, evaluating the scholarly nature of the source involves examining the credentials of the author, the publication’s reputation, citation frequency, and whether the article is peer-reviewed. For instance, articles published in reputable academic journals like the Journal of Social Issues or Educational Researcher are considered credible.

The annotated reference table is a key component of this assignment. It typically includes the article title, author(s), a brief paraphrased abstract, reasons why the source is scholarly, search strategies used to find the article, and how the article supports your research objectives. For example, an entry might detail how the article contributes to understanding specific mechanisms of social inequality, thereby directly informing your analysis and argument development in the final paper.

Moreover, documenting your search methodology demonstrates an organized research approach. Mentioning the databases used (e.g., ProQuest, JSTOR, EBSCOhost), the keywords applied, and any narrowings such as date range or peer-reviewed filters show the depth and precision of your research process.

Other critical aspects involve assessing the relevance of each article to your research question. This involves connecting the key themes, evidence, or theoretical frameworks presented in the sources with your research focus. For instance, if your topic addresses systemic racism in education, articles discussing policy analysis, community interventions, or pedagogical approaches would be particularly pertinent.

In conclusion, this journal review and annotated reference process does more than prepare you for your final research paper; it enhances your ability to critically evaluate sources, organize research effectively, and develop a well-supported academic argument. Ensuring that all sources are credible, relevant, and properly documented will strengthen the quality of your final submission and demonstrate scholarly rigor.

References

• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. Sage Publications.
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2013). Practical Research: Planning and Design (10th ed.). Pearson.
• Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Corwin.
• Paré, G., Trudel, M., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing Qualitative and Quantitative Literature Reviews: A Case Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(3), e99.
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing.
• Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. Sage Publications.
• Wheeldon, J. (2012). Using Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies. Routledge.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.