Review The AFIT GPS Case Study And The AFIT Hubble Space Tel

Review the AFIT GPS Case Study and the AFIT Hubble Space Teles

Review the AFIT GPS Case Study and the AFIT Hubble Space Telescope Case Study, and choose one case study for use with your final project. Keep in mind as you craft your submission that you will be learning more about the sections of the final project (Systems Life-Cycle, Requirements, Trade-Off Studies, and Risk Management) as we move through the course. This milestone is a place to share what you know now, as well as what questions you have related to your case study. The SEBoK acronym list may be helpful as you complete this milestone. This milestone should address the critical elements below, which include a draft of the Systems Life-Cycle portion of your final project.

Paper For Above instruction

The chosen case study for this project is the AFIT GPS (Air Force Institute of Technology Global Positioning System) case study. This case study provides a comprehensive overview of the development, deployment, and future planning of a sophisticated satellite navigation system. I selected this case study because of its intricate system development process, the challenges faced during deployment, and the ongoing evolution required to maintain system relevance in a rapidly advancing technological environment. Additionally, GPS technology is integral to numerous modern applications, making it an especially compelling subject for detailed analysis and future system planning.

What interests me about this case study is the multifaceted nature of systems engineering involved, from the initial concept through to the deployment and future upgrades. The GPS system exemplifies complex systems integration, requiring coordination among various subsystems, including satellite design, ground control, and user equipment. The case study highlights how managing requirements, trade-offs, and risks are crucial to mission success. Its real-world application provides insight into the systems life-cycle and the importance of strategic planning for sustaining operational capability.

In planning for the final project, I intend to focus on several key sections of this case study to facilitate a comprehensive understanding and analysis. For the Systems Life-Cycle, I will examine how the development process was structured—identifying the principal products, activities, phases, and stakeholders involved. This will include understanding the development methodology employed, whether it adhered to best practices, and what gaps or missing elements were present. I will analyze the process to see if it reflected a typical systems engineering approach, such as the use of iterative cycles, stakeholder engagement, and verification activities.

For deployment, I plan to explore the integration process of the GPS system. This includes how the satellites, ground stations, and user equipment were assembled, tested, and installed into the operational environment. I will investigate how the system was fielded—what procedures were followed, what challenges were encountered, and which lessons were learned to improve future deployments. Assumptions may be made where specific deployment details are limited, but these will be clearly stated and justified based on industry standards or analogous systems.

Regarding the future of the system, I will analyze plans for maintenance, upgrades, and evolution. This includes understanding how the GPS system is maintained—such as scheduled replacements, software updates, and emergent repairs—and how future capabilities are being managed. I will also consider how the system's evolution is being strategically planned, including the integration of new satellite technologies, enhancements in accuracy, and resilience against threats. Assumptions about future developments will be made explicit, supported by current trends and strategic documentation where available.

This case study offers a valuable opportunity to apply systems engineering principles to a real-world, high-impact technology system. It covers multiple facets essential to successful system development and sustainment, making it a robust foundation for understanding complex project management, technical trade-offs, risk mitigation, and lifecycle planning. Analyzing this case will not only enhance comprehension of practical systems engineering but also inform future strategies for managing similarly complex projects.

References

  • U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. (2017). AFIT GPS Case Study. Retrieved from [appropriate URL or database]
  • Leondes, C. T. (Ed.). (2017). Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities. Elsevier.
  • Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (2010). Systems Engineering and Analysis (5th ed.). Pearson.
  • Boehm, B. W. (1988). A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. Computer, 21(5), 61–72.
  • INCOSE. (2015). Systems Engineering Vision 2025. International Council on Systems Engineering.
  • DoD Systems Engineering Fundamentals. (2009). Defense Acquisition University Press.
  • NASA Systems Engineering Handbook. (2016). NASA. Retrieved from [URL]
  • Harvey, R. (2005). The Systems Approach to Project Management. Wiley.
  • IEEE Std 1220-1994 (Revision of IEEE Std 1220-1992). (1994). IEEE Standard for System Requirements Analysis.
  • Kossiakoff, A., Sweet, W. N., Seymour, S. J., & Biemer, S. M. (2011). Systems Engineering Principles and Practice (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Related Assignments