Review The Article: Abomhara, M., & Koi ✓ Solved

For this assignment, review the article: Abomhara, M., & Koi

For this assignment, review the article: Abomhara, M., & Koien, G.M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks. Journal of Cyber Security, 4, 65-88. Doi: 10.13052/jcsm.414

Address the following:

  • What did the authors investigate, and in general how did they do so?
  • Identify the hypothesis or question being tested.
  • Summarize the overall article.
  • Identify the conclusions of the authors.
  • Indicate whether or not you think the data support their conclusions/hypothesis.
  • Consider alternative explanations for the results.
  • Provide any additional comments pertaining to other approaches to testing their hypothesis (logical follow-up studies to build on, confirm or refute the conclusions).
  • The relevance or importance of the study.
  • The appropriateness of the experimental design.

When you write your evaluation, be brief and concise. This is not meant to be an essay but an objective evaluation that one can read very easily and quickly. Also, you should include a complete reference (title, authors, journal, issue, pages) you turn in your evaluation. This is good practice for your literature review, which you’ll be completing during the dissertation process.

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

  • Be approximately four to six pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page.
  • Follow APA 7 guidelines.
  • Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
  • Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook.
  • The UC Library is a great place to find resources.
  • Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques.

You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

The article by Abomhara and Koien (2015) provides a detailed examination of the vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks associated with the Internet of Things (IoT). As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, understanding the security implications of IoT devices is pertinent. This review will summarize the authors' investigation, hypothesis, conclusions, and evaluate the strength of their research. Additionally, it will explore alternative explanations for their results and suggest logical follow-up studies.

What the Authors Investigated

Abomhara and Koien (2015) delved into the various security vulnerabilities inherent in IoT devices. They aimed to highlight the array of threats that these devices face, including potential intruders and types of attacks that can be executed against them. The authors conducted a comprehensive literature review and synthesized existing studies on cyber threats targeting IoT technologies. This method provided a broader context for understanding the security landscape surrounding IoT and how these vulnerabilities can be exploited.

Hypothesis or Question Being Tested

The central hypothesis investigated by the authors pertains to the increasing vulnerability of IoT systems to cyber threats. They examined how traditional security frameworks were inadequate in coping with the unique challenges posed by the omnipresence of IoT devices. Accordingly, they posited that an understanding of these vulnerabilities and threats is crucial for improving IoT security measures.

Summary of the Overall Article

The article begins by defining the scope of IoT and discusses its applications in various industries. The authors categorize different types of vulnerabilities, such as hardware, software, network, and physical vulnerabilities. They also address common threats, including malicious attacks from intruders and exploitation of weaknesses in device firmware. The authors conclude by emphasizing the need for robust security protocols tailored to the specific characteristics and operational contexts of IoT devices.

Conclusions of the Authors

The authors concluded that IoT systems are highly prone to cyber threats due to their interconnected nature and the growing number of devices joining the network. They asserted that existing cybersecurity measures need significant enhancement to effectively safeguard IoT ecosystems. The study advocates for multi-layered security strategies that encompass not just technology but also user awareness and organizational protocols.

Support for Their Conclusions/Hypothesis

The data presented in the article support the authors' conclusions, indicating a pressing need for improved security measures in IoT devices. The literature reviewed demonstrates numerous documented attacks, highlighting the vulnerabilities that can lead to severe consequences for users and organizations. However, while the evidence is compelling, further empirical data could strengthen the authors' assertions.

Alternative Explanations for Results

While the authors provide substantial evidence of IoT vulnerabilities, it is equally important to consider alternative explanations for their findings. One potential explanation could be the rapid evolution of technology, which often outpaces security measures. Additionally, differing levels of user awareness and engagement can lead to varying experiences with IoT security, thus affecting threat perceptions and incident rates.

Additional Comments and Follow-up Studies

To build on their conclusions, the authors could benefit from conducting empirical studies that assess the effectiveness of specific security measures deployed across different IoT applications. Future research could also consider longitudinal studies to track how emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence in security systems, impact IoT security over time. Such studies would provide a more robust framework for understanding how to mitigate vulnerabilities effectively.

Relevance of the Study

The relevance of this study cannot be overstated. As more devices become smart and interconnected, understanding the vulnerabilities they pose is essential. This research not only aids cybersecurity professionals in devising better strategies but also informs policymakers on the necessary regulations to protect consumers in an increasingly digital world.

Appropriateness of the Experimental Design

The experimental design employed in the article, which consisted primarily of a literature review, is appropriate for the objectives outlined. However, incorporating empirical studies or case analyses could enhance the conclusions drawn by providing real-world applicability to the theoretical insights gathered. By complementing their literature review with qualitative or quantitative data, the authors could create a more comprehensive understanding of the IoT security landscape.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the article by Abomhara and Koien effectively sheds light on the pressing cybersecurity concerns facing the Internet of Things. Although the authors provide key insights into vulnerabilities and threats, further research is warranted to validate their conclusions and explore new avenues for securing IoT devices. This study serves as an essential foundational piece that highlights the complexities of IoT security and sets the stage for future exploration.

References

  • Abomhara, M., & Koien, G. M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks. Journal of Cyber Security, 4, 65-88. Doi: 10.13052/jcsm.414
  • Weber, R. H. (2010). Internet of Things: Legal Perspectives. Springer.
  • Safi, A., & Awan, S. (2020). Cybersecurity Threats in IoT: A Review. Future Generation Computer Systems, 108, 826-837.
  • Shin, S., & Park, M. (2019). Current Status of Cybersecurity in the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(8), 1531-1545.
  • Hossain, M. S., & Muhammad, G. (2016). Cloud-assisted Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) – Enabled Framework for theManufacturing Industry. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 78, 50-70.
  • Yang, Q., & Wu, Y. (2014). Security and Privacy Issues in Internet of Things: A Survey. IEEE Access, 2, 1086-1098.
  • Alaba, F. A., Othman, M., & Zubairu, A. (2018). Internet of Things Security: A Survey. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 2018.
  • Wang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2015). Cyber-Physical Systems Security: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 48(3), 57.
  • Kim, J., & Kim, Y. (2020). The Internet of Things in the Age of Cyber Attacks. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101-112.
  • Conway, K. (2016). IoT Security Concerns and Challenges. Computer Fraud & Security, 2016(1), 5-10.

Related Assignments