Review The Feedback On The Change Proposal Professional ✓ Solved

Review the feedback on the change proposal professional

Review the feedback on the change proposal professional presentation and make required adjustments to the presentation. Present your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Be prepared to answer questions and accept feedback. After presenting your capstone project change proposal, write a word summary of the presentation. Include a description of the changes that were suggested by your preceptor before your presentation and how you incorporated that feedback. Describe how this interprofessional collaboration improved the effectiveness of your presentation. Include a description of the feedback and questions from your audience after your presentation, and how this experience will affect your professional practice in the future.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Paper For Above Instructions

The presentation of a change proposal is a critical step in advocating for evidence-based interventions in healthcare settings. This document serves to summarize the feedback received on my presentation and detail the adjustments made in response to that feedback, as well as to illustrate how interprofessional collaboration enhanced the effectiveness of my proposal on fostering after-discharge follow-up.

Before presenting my capstone project change proposal regarding fostering after-discharge follow-up, I received constructive criticism from my preceptor. Key suggested changes included enhancing the clarity of the visuals in my PowerPoint presentation, focusing more on the evidence supporting my proposed interventions, and rehearsing the delivery to improve timing and engagement. The incorporation of these suggestions involved revising the slides to include clearer graphs and images that exemplified the expected outcomes of the interventions, structuring the content to align closely with the evidence-based literature, and engaging in several practice sessions to refine my delivery and ensure I was within the allotted time.

Impact of Interprofessional Collaboration

Collaboration with my preceptor and other stakeholders was instrumental in refining the proposal's presentation. Their feedback provided insights that I had not initially considered, particularly regarding the audience's perspective. Collaborating with diverse professionals allowed me to understand various viewpoints on the proposed changes and foreseen challenges in implementing follow-up protocols after discharge. This collaboration significantly improved the comprehensibility of the presentation, as I was able to adjust my language and explanations to better suit a diverse audience, thus enhancing overall engagement.

During the presentation, I presented evidence from recent studies supporting the importance of discharged patient follow-up. I discussed the role of systematic follow-up in reducing readmissions and improving patient outcomes, highlighting the statistical data that showed a correlation between post-discharge engagement and enhanced recovery. Feedback from the audience was generally positive; however, several key questions emerged. Members of the audience, including nurses, physicians, and hospital administrators, inquired about the logistical aspects of implementing the proposed changes and what resources would be needed for successful adoption.

The questions posed by the audience highlighted the critical importance of engaging stakeholders in the planning phase of any change proposal. Many acknowledged the potential benefits but raised concerns about the challenges, such as staffing constraints and budgeting. Engaging with these questions not only demonstrated the importance of stakeholder involvement in healthcare reform but also helped solidify my understanding of the necessity for robust communication strategy throughout the implementation stage. It was invaluable to practice responding to inquiries in real-time, as it allowed me to gather a greater understanding of the audience's primary concerns and how to address them in a future scenario.

Future Implications for Professional Practice

This presentation experience will profoundly influence my professional practice in several ways. First, I have learned that interprofessional collaboration is not just a theoretical component of healthcare but is essential for developing practical, effective proposals. Engaging with people from different professional backgrounds has made me appreciate the value of diverse perspectives in problem-solving and proposal development.

Additionally, the experience underscored the importance of being prepared to engage with questions and critiques regarding proposed changes. In future proposals, I will prioritize conducting thorough research and being ready to provide evidence supporting recommendations while also being receptive to feedback. This mindset will not only benefit my future presentation skills but also cultivate a culture of collaboration and openness among colleagues and stakeholders.

Overall, receiving feedback and executing changes based on that feedback enhanced the quality of my presentation, fostered an engaging discussion with the audience, and equipped me with invaluable skills for my future practice as a healthcare professional. It reinforced the notion that feedback is not merely a formality but a vital tool for personal and professional growth. Therefore, I am committed to actively seeking collaboration and embracing feedback in all facets of my career.

References

• Davis, M. M., & McCaffrey, D. C. (2019). Follow-up care after hospital discharge - A systematic review. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 14(2), 92-101.
• Weaver, S. J., et al. (2014). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(2), 113-125.
• Hesselink, G., Schoonhoven, L., Barach, P., et al. (2012). Improving patient discharge and reducing hospital readmissions by using intervention mapping. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 1-8.
• Becker, S. J., & McClelland, A. (2017). Evidence-based interventions for high-risk patients after discharge. Health Affairs, 36(3), 538-542.
• Forster, A. J., et al. (2003). The incidence and determinants of adverse events after discharge from hospital. BMJ, 327(7425), 606.
• Weiss, M. E., Costa, L. L., & Costa, L. L. (2014). Evidence-based strategies for successful patient transitions at discharge. Journal of Nursing Administration, 44(3), 128-134.
• Hansen, L. O., et al. (2008). The U.S. experience with hospital readmissions: Must hospitals manage post-discharge transitions? Health Affairs, 27(1), 66-76.
• Huang, A., et al. (2015). The effect of discharge planning on readmissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Hospital Medicine, 34(2), 491-498.
• Coulter, A., & Ellins, J. (2007). Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. Health Expectations, 10(2), 118-115.
• Berry, L. L., & Bendapudi, N. (2007). Health care: A closing gap in patient experience and engagement. California Management Review, 50(1), 115-133.