Review The Interview Mini Project Assignment Introduced In T

Review The Interview Mini Project Assignment Introduced In The Applica

Review the interview mini-project assignment introduced in the Application this week. The best practices and pitfalls you identify in this assignment will help you complete the first part of the mini-project. Review the required reading in Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches; “Stretching” Exercises for Qualitative Researchers; and Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods for this week. Review the two media segments on interviewing. As you view the videos, practice your observation skills by creating field notes for yourself. Be careful to distinguish between observation and interpretation as Dr. Crawford warns in the videos. Evaluate the techniques used in each interview. Which practices could you use in your own interviews? Which practices should you avoid? Where did the person in the video go wrong? How could this issue have been avoided or corrected? A 2- to 3-paragraph evaluation of the interview techniques used in both interviews. Include commentary and analysis of best practices, practices to avoid, and how this viewing experience will inform your approach to the interviewing assignment introduced in this week's Application. Please cite from the following: Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. Janesick, V.J. (2011). “Stretching” exercises for qualitative researchers. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Paper For Above instruction

The interview mini-project introduced in this week's application serves as a foundational exercise in qualitative research, emphasizing the importance of effective interviewing techniques, careful observation, and analytical rigor. This assignment aligns closely with the principles outlined in Creswell’s (2013) qualitative inquiry framework, which advocates for systematic data collection methods that prioritize depth and contextual understanding. The critical review of media segments on interviewing reinforces the necessity of distinguishing between observation and interpretation—an essential skill for qualitative researchers. Dr. Crawford’s emphasis on this distinction highlights that accurate field notes rely on objective observation, free from conjecture, which enhances the credibility and validity of the data collected.

In analyzing the interview techniques demonstrated in the video segments, several best practices emerge that can inform future research. Effective interviewers maintain a neutral demeanor, use open-ended questions, and employ active listening skills to facilitate rich, detailed responses. For instance, interviewers who avoid leading questions and allow interviewees to express themselves freely tend to gather more authentic data. Conversely, pitfalls such as interrupting respondents, displaying overreaction, or deviating from prepared questions can hinder the quality of data and introduce bias. In one segment, a researcher who interrupted repeatedly or showed signs of impatience potentially disrupted the respondent’s flow, leading to less candid responses. Such practices should be avoided, and interviewers should instead focus on creating a safe and trusting environment that encourages openness.

Practically, these observations underscore the importance of careful preparation and self-awareness during interviews. Incorporating open-ended questions and maintaining a non-judgmental stance can foster deeper insights. Moreover, recognizing and mitigating personal biases—by reflecting on one’s assumptions and practicing active listening—are vital in producing credible qualitative data. The viewing experience has reinforced the need to refine interviewer skills continuously, emphasizing patience, empathy, and attentive listening. Moving forward, integrating these lessons will improve the quality of my interviewing approach, ensuring that I gather nuanced insights that accurately reflect participants’ perspectives. Additionally, understanding common pitfalls enables me to design interviews that are more effective and ethically sound, ultimately strengthening the validity and richness of my qualitative research.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Janesick, V. J. (2011). “Stretching” exercises for qualitative researchers. (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.

Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006). Qualitative research guidelines project. James J. Gross. University of California, Berkeley.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.

Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage Publications.

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications.

Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage Publications.

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage Publications.