Review The Resources And Reflect On The Mission Of StateReGi ✓ Solved
Review The Resources And Reflect On The Mission Of Stateregional
Review the Resources and reflect on the mission of state/regional boards of nursing as the protection of the public through the regulation of nursing practice. Consider how key regulations may impact nursing practice. Review key regulations for nursing practice of your state’s/region’s board of nursing and those of at least one other state/region and select at least two APRN regulations to focus on for this Discussion. Post a comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations in your state/region with those of at least one other state/region. Describe how they may differ. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how the regulations you selected may apply to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) who have legal authority to practice within the full scope of their education and experience. Provide at least one example of how APRNs may adhere to the two regulations you selected.
Sample Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The mission of state and regional boards of nursing (BONs) is fundamentally rooted in safeguarding public health by regulating nursing practice, including setting standards for licensure, education, and practice regulation. These agencies ensure that nurses, including Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs), deliver safe, competent, and ethical care aligned with statutory requirements. The regulatory frameworks set by BONs are instrumental in shaping nursing practice across different states and regions, adapting to the unique healthcare needs and legislative environments of their jurisdictions. This paper provides a comparative analysis of two APRN regulations from my state and another state, highlighting their differences and exploring their implications for APRNs practicing within their full scope.
APRN Regulations in State A and State B
In State A, the Board of Nursing's regulations allow APRNs to practice independently, including prescribing medications and managing patient care without physician oversight, contingent upon obtaining a collaboration agreement with a physician. For example, the state's Nurse Practitioner Practice Act emphasizes full practice authority, allowing APRNs to evaluate, diagnose, and treat patients independently (State A BON, 2022). In contrast, State B requires APRNs to operate under physician supervision or collaborative agreements for prescribing certain medications and managing patient care, limiting their autonomy (State B BON, 2021).
The second regulation focuses on prescribing authority. In State A, APRNs have the authority to prescribe without restrictions related to formularies or supervision, provided they have completed required pharmacology continuing education. Conversely, State B imposes restrictions, such as requiring prior approval or collaboration for prescribing controlled substances, which may delay patient access to timely treatment (State B BON, 2021).
Differences and Implications
The key differences between these two states lie in practice autonomy and prescribing regulations. State A's full practice authority supports APRNs in delivering comprehensive, autonomous care, which can improve access, especially in rural or underserved areas. For example, in State A, an APRN can independently evaluate and initiate treatment for acute illnesses, increasing healthcare efficiency (Holloway & Zangaro, 2019). Conversely, State B’s supervising requirements may hinder timely care delivery and place additional administrative burdens on APRNs, potentially impacting patient outcomes.
These regulatory differences impact APRNs' ability to practice to their full scope. In State A, APRNs can serve as primary care providers, managing a wide range of health conditions independently. Meanwhile, in State B, their practice scope is more limited, often leading to role frustration and workforce shortages in primary care settings.
Application to APRNs Practicing within Full Scope
The regulations chosen, particularly those related to practice authority and prescribing limitations, directly influence how APRNs apply their full scope of practice. In State A, an APRN can independently diagnose and initiate treatment for complex medical conditions, adhering to clinical guidelines and standards. For example, an APRN managing a diabetic patient can order labs, adjust medications, and coordinate referrals without awaiting physician approval, thereby providing timely and comprehensive care (American Association of Nurse Practitioners [AANP], 2023).
In contrast, in State B, the requirement of physician oversight might necessitate periodic consultations, potentially delaying interventions or complicating care coordination. Nevertheless, APRNs in State B can adhere to regulations by maintaining thorough documentation of consultations and demonstrating collaborative efforts with physicians to ensure compliance and quality care delivery.
Conclusion
Regulations governing APRN practice vary significantly between states, affecting their autonomy, scope, and ability to serve populations effectively. States with full practice authority empower APRNs to fully utilize their education and training, leading to improved access and efficiency in healthcare delivery. Understanding these regulatory differences is crucial for APRNs to navigate their legal scope of practice and provide safe, high-quality care within their jurisdictions.