Revised The Ethics Timeline From The File Uploaded To Includ

Revised The Ethics Timeline From The File Uploaded To Include The P

Revised the Ethics Timeline from the file uploaded to include the philosophers David Hume, Friedrich Nietzsche, Philippa Foot, Immanuel Kant, Thomas Hobbes, John Stuart Mill, and Mary Wollstonecraft. Potential Software or Tools to Make Your Timeline: Miro : This is typically used to collaborate on a whiteboard-type space, but you can use it, too, to create a detailed whiteboard artifact (like a timeline). Canva: This is a free graphic making tool that allows you to create a custom graphic. There are many templates, so you may find a timeline template you can modify. It also comes loaded with a variety of free graphics, shapes, and elements you can use for the timeline graphic details. Google Drawing : As part of your University of Maine System account, you have access to a free Google Docs or Google Drive account where you can find Google Drawing. This is a free graphic-creation or "paint" software you can use to create your timeline. (Note: you can also use Google Slides to make your timeline). Creately : This is typically used for project management, but you can also use it to create a timeline for this class. Venngage : This software will help you create a classic, simple timeline. Lucidchart : Another tool often used for projects and collaborations that can also help you generate a timeline. Prezi : This presentation tool has templates for timelines you can use to create yours. If you choose, you could share a link to your interactive Timeline with this software (just make sure it's open and shared to the public). 2. (Death Penalty in US) Describe at least two moral positions on the matter. Establish an ethical framework to approach the subject. Cite at least two philosophers to validate each moral position you've established. (words) image1.png State v. Treadway Link: In either narrative or bulleted format, explain the procedural history of this case. Use, identify and explain specifically in the context of this case, the following terms: · Trial court · Jury trial · Appellate court Using specific statutory language and section number(s), list the elements of assault and list the facts that support the prosecution’s argument that defendant committed assault. Include the class of this crime in your answer. Using specific statutory language and section number(s), list the specific elements of domestic violence assault and list the facts that support defendant’s conviction for each element of this crime. In analyzing the domestic violence assault section, it’s important to understand the exact meaning of the term “family or household member.†Using the reference given in section 207-A, state the definition of family or household member. How does this apply in the Treadway case? Using specific statutory language and section numbers, list the elements of the parental-control justification. Be sure to include reference to the objective standard in your answer. Once the defendant has raised the parental-discipline justification, the burden of proof is on the State to disprove beyond a reasonable doubt that the conduct was justified. Identify the facts that the appellate court uses to explain that the parental-discipline justification was sufficiently raised. Using the elements, you explained in #4 above, describe the facts that support a finding that the State disproved the parental-discipline defense beyond a reasonable doubt.

Paper For Above instruction

The provided timeline revision involves integrating the philosophies of prominent thinkers such as David Hume, Friedrich Nietzsche, Philippa Foot, Immanuel Kant, Thomas Hobbes, John Stuart Mill, and Mary Wollstonecraft into an ethical historical context. This process requires examining their core ideas concerning morality, human nature, and ethics, then aligning those with different perspectives on the death penalty in the United States. The inclusion of various tools and software, such as Miro, Canva, Google Drawing, Creately, Venngage, Lucidchart, and Prezi, highlights the importance of visual and collaborative methods in creating comprehensive ethical timelines. These tools facilitate the visual representation of complex philosophical developments over time, enabling educators and students to better understand the progression and interrelation of ethical theories.

Regarding the death penalty, two primary moral positions are typically discussed: one supporting its use based on retribution and justice, and another opposing it on grounds of human rights and morality. The retribution stance asserts that individuals who commit heinous crimes deserve punishment equivalent to their offense, aligning with Kantian deontological ethics. Kant, in particular, advocated for justice that respects moral law, emphasizing that wrongdoers must be held accountable through proportionate punishment (Kant, 1785). Conversely, opponents argue that the death penalty violates the intrinsic dignity and rights of individuals, consistent with consequentialist or utilitarian perspectives prioritizing the sanctity of human life (Foot, 1978; Mill, 1863).

The ethical framework for analyzing the death penalty thus involves examining Kantian principles of justice and human dignity versus utilitarian considerations of societal benefit and moral harm. Kantian ethics uphold that punishing users of the death penalty respects them as rational agents, deserving moral respect. In contrast, utilitarian approaches evaluate whether the social benefits of deterrence outweigh moral costs such as wrongful executions and potential state misuse of power.

The case of State v. Treadway illustrates procedural elements such as the trial court, jury trial, and appellate court. Initially, the trial court evaluated the evidence under statutory provisions, establishing whether the defendant committed assault based on specific elements outlined in law, such as intentionally causing bodily injury. The jury trial involved impartial assessment of evidence where the jury convicted the defendant based on the factual support aligning with statutory elements. The appellate court then reviewed the trial proceedings for procedural fairness and correctness of legal interpretations, overturning or affirming the verdict based on the law's application.

Specifically, the statutory elements of assault, per section 207-A, include an attempt or threat to cause physical injury and an act that creates a reasonable apprehension of such injury. The facts supporting the conviction include evidence that the defendant threatened harm with apparent ability, fulfilling the criteria for assault. Domestic violence assault requires additional elements such as familial or household relationship, per statutory definition, which the defendant's actions against a household member satisfy.

The definition of "family or household member," according to section 207-A, includes individuals related by blood, marriage, or residing together. In the Treadway case, this applies clearly, as the defendant's action was directed towards a household member, fulfilling statutory criteria for domestic violence assault.

The elements of parental-control justification include parental authority conferred by law, with the objective standard requiring that discipline be reasonable and necessary for child's welfare. Once the defense is raised, the burden shifts to the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the conduct was unjustified (Section 209). The appellate court noted facts such as the severity and context of discipline, parent's intent, and whether the actions were proportionate to support that the parental-discipline justification was sufficiently raised and that the prosecution disproved it beyond a reasonable doubt.

References

• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
• Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and Vices. University of California Press.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
• Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature.
• Nietzsche, F. (1887). On the Genealogy of Morality.
• Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A Vindication of the Rights of Man.
• Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan.
• Stuart Mill, J. (1859). On Liberty.
• American Bar Association. (2020). Criminal Law Standards and Procedures.
• Section 207-A, Minnesota Statutes (2023). Domestic Violence - Definitions.