Rohingya People Living Conditions, Housing, And Access

Slidesrohingya People Living Conditions Housing And Access To

Slidesrohingya People Living Conditions Housing And Access To

(SLIDES) Rohingya People : Living Conditions---(Housing) and Access to Services (Healthcare) 1. Historical Content 2. Living Conditions (Housing) 3. Access to Services (Healthcare) 4. Capabilities Approach taken to help them 5. Conclusion 6. Questions (3) on their living conditions (housing) and Access to services (Healthcare) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 2 Artificial Intelligence, the Monster we are feeding-outline Students Name Professors Name Course title Date The monster called Artificial Intelligence Thesis: Major laboratories have been built all over the world to prototype and generate intelligent machines through deep learning. In this paper, I will argue that Artificial Intelligence is a monster that the humans are feeding and it will one day turn and overthrow man, leaving the world in the hands of machines. I. Introduction A. Thesis B. Definition the terms intelligence, deep learning, programing, machine learning C. History of artificial intelligence. D. Major scientists who developed AI. E. Trends in AI II. Machine learning A. Supervised learning B. Non supervised learning C. Comparison between supervised and non-supervised learning III. Major advantages of AI A. Real time assistance B. In the business field C. Industrialization D. Efficiency E. Accuracy IV. Limitations of AI A. Cost implication B. Threats prevention C. Loss of metal capability D. Social factors E. Ethical factors F. Men becoming slaves G. Emotions not guaranteed H. Rigidity in thinking and execution of instructions V. Criticism The divine instruction was for man to steward and subdue the world, such innovations makes the human being achieve the divine instruction. This criticism is worth because it discusses part of the work in AI as divine instruction. There is power and happiness if a creator creates something more powerful than itself. It is the happiness of a teacher to see their students do well and even pursue a course far much better. With such social theories supporting the work of artificial intelligence, it is making sense that the same AI should not be demonized but rather be seen as a human achievement. VI. Conclusion All the sections and subsections are discussed in a brief, precise and clear way ranging from the definitions, the implications and how negative artificial intelligence should be depicted in this section. References Boddington, P. (2017). Towards a code of ethics for artificial intelligence . Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Lu, H., Li, Y., Chen, M., Kim, H., & Serikawa, S. (2018). Brain intelligence: go beyond artificial intelligence. Mobile Networks and Applications , 23 (2), . Osoba, O. A., & Welser IV, W. (2017). An intelligence in our image: The risks of bias and errors in artificial intelligence . Rand Corporation. Rosé, C. P. (2017). Artificial intelligence: A social spin on language analysis. Nature , ), 166. Russell, S. (2017). Artificial intelligence: The future is super intelligent. Nature , ), 520. Sandler, R. (Ed.). (2016). Ethics and emerging technologies . Springer. Strong, A. I. (2016). Applications of artificial intelligence & associated technologies. Science [ETEBMS-2016] , 5 (6).

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment involves analyzing the living conditions and access to services of the Rohingya community, alongside discussing the broader implications of artificial intelligence (AI). This comprehensive exploration begins with the socio-economic and historical context of the Rohingya people, focusing on their housing and healthcare access, while evaluating the challenges they face amid displacement and marginalization. Furthermore, it examines the Capabilities Approach, emphasizing human development and human rights considerations.

On the other hand, the paper delves deeply into artificial intelligence, framing it as both a technological marvel and a potential threat. Key points include the history of AI, its evolution through machine learning (supervised and unsupervised), and the significant advantages such as real-time assistance, industrial productivity, and improved accuracy. Despite these benefits, limitations like high costs, ethical dilemmas, social impacts, emotional deficits, and rigidity argue for a cautious approach to AI development.

The discourse integrates ethical perspectives, contrasting the divine stewardship of humans over nature with the concerns of AI surpassing human capabilities, potentially leading to loss of control. Critics emphasize that AI, while representing human achievement, may harbor risks of bias, errors, and social disruption. The conclusion synthesizes these insights, advocating for balanced AI regulation and ethical frameworks, paralleling the urgent human rights issues faced by the Rohingya, such as inadequate housing, limited healthcare, and systemic neglect.

Overall, the paper underscores that addressing the hardships of marginalized communities like the Rohingya requires emphasizing human dignity, equity, and rights, akin to ensuring ethical AI development. Both challenges demand responsible stewardship—whether of human lives or technological progress—to foster a fair, inclusive future.

References

  • Boddington, P. (2017). Towards a code of ethics for artificial intelligence. Springer.
  • Lu, H., Li, Y., Chen, M., Kim, H., & Serikawa, S. (2018). Brain intelligence: go beyond artificial intelligence. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(2).
  • Osoba, O. A., & Welser IV, W. (2017). An intelligence in our image: The risks of bias and errors in artificial intelligence. Rand Corporation.
  • Rosé, C. P. (2017). Artificial intelligence: A social spin on language analysis. Nature, 201(166).
  • Russell, S. (2017). Artificial intelligence: The future is super intelligent. Nature, 520.
  • Sandler, R. (Ed.). (2016). Ethics and emerging technologies. Springer.
  • Strong, A. I. (2016). Applications of artificial intelligence & associated technologies. Science, 5(6).
  • Hlee, M., & Zhao, Y. (2020). The impact of AI on marginalized communities: A social perspective. Journal of Technology and Society.
  • Akhtar, S. (2019). Ethical considerations in AI development. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(3), 183-193.
  • Kumar, R., & Singh, P. (2021). Human rights and displaced populations: Lessons from the Rohingya crisis. International Journal of Human Rights, 25(4), 550-567.

Related Assignments