Rokeach Values Survey Developed By Milton Rokeach In 1973

Rokeach Values Surveydeveloped By Milton Rokeach In 1973 The Purpose

Developed by Milton Rokeach in 1973, the purpose of the Rokeach Values Survey is to classify human values and help individuals better understand what is important to them. Values themselves are not directly observable, but their influence is reflected in behaviors. The survey distinguishes between two types of values: terminal values and instrumental values. Terminal values represent desired end states—goals a person wishes to achieve during their lifetime—such as true friendship, world peace, and a comfortable life. These are achievable objectives that signify ultimate life aims. Instrumental values, on the other hand, are modes of behavior or means of achieving terminal values. They include qualities like honesty, self-control, and ambition, which facilitate the attainment of one's goals. Recognizing and ranking these values helps individuals understand their priorities and motivations.

Paper For Above instruction

The Rokeach Values Survey, developed by Milton Rokeach in 1973, remains a foundational tool in understanding human values and guiding personal development. The survey's primary aim is to categorize human values into terminal and instrumental categories, which serve to elucidate what individuals prioritize in their lives and how they go about achieving these priorities. By engaging with the survey, individuals gain insights into their core beliefs and behaviors, thus fostering self-awareness and guiding decision-making processes aligned with their value systems.

Terminal values, as defined in the survey, are end goals that individuals aspire to achieve. They represent desirable states or conditions that provide meaning and purpose to life. These include aspirations like world peace, happiness, mature love, and safety. Such values reflect an individual's ultimate objectives and often serve as guiding principles for long-term planning and life choices. For example, an individual who ranks "world peace" highly likely values harmony and stability not only globally but also in their personal relationships and community involvement. These terminal values often influence broader societal roles and personal aspirations.

Instrumental values complement terminal values by providing the means to achieve desired end states. They pertain to modes of conduct that facilitate the fulfillment of terminal goals. Qualities such as honesty, ambition, independence, and self-control serve as behavioral guides that help individuals attain their ultimate life objectives. For instance, someone valuing "self-control" as an instrumental value might approach challenges with discipline to maintain focus on their goal of personal or professional success. The emphasis on instrumental values highlights the importance of character traits and behavioral norms that align with personal and societal ideals.

Understanding the process of ranking these values involves introspection and honest reflection. When completing the survey, individuals should focus on one set at a time. Starting with terminal values, they identify the most important value to them and then rank the remaining items from most to least important, assigning numbers from 1 (most important) to 18 (least important). This exercise requires critical self-assessment, as individuals must determine which end goals resonate most deeply with their personal aspirations and life philosophy.

After completing the ranking of terminal values, individuals proceed to the instrumental values, applying the same method. Their rankings reveal which behaviors and traits they deem most essential in their pursuit of life goals. The results are often revealing, exposing dominant priorities and contrasting preferences. The top-ranked terminal and instrumental values can demonstrate an individual's core motivations, ethical standards, and behavioral tendencies, which can be insightful for personal growth, career planning, counseling, and understanding societal dynamics.

For example, a person who ranks "world peace" as their top terminal value and "honesty" as their primary instrumental value may prioritize harmony and truthfulness in their relationships and societal interactions. Conversely, someone who places a high emphasis on "happiness" and "ambition" may focus more on personal achievement and emotional fulfillment. Facilitating awareness of these value hierarchies allows individuals to align their actions with their true priorities, contributing to greater life satisfaction and authenticity.

Practicing such reflective ranking exercises enhances self-understanding and decision-making. It fosters clarity about what one's life pursuits should be and what behaviors are worth cultivating. Moreover, recognizing the hierarchy of values can improve interpersonal relationships by fostering empathy and understanding of others' value systems. For organizations and leaders, understanding the value systems of team members can inform motivation strategies, ethical practices, and corporate culture development.

In summary, the Rokeach Values Survey functions as a powerful self-assessment tool. By systematically ranking terminal and instrumental values, individuals gain critical insights into their behaviors, motivations, and long-term aspirations. The knowledge derived from this process supports personal growth, enhances interpersonal understanding, and guides life choices that are aligned with deeply held values. As society continues to evolve, understanding the core values that drive human behavior remains an essential pursuit in fostering a harmonious and ethically grounded world.

References

• Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free Press.
• Harold, G. (2004). Values and human behavior: The psychology of human values. Journal of Social Psychology, 144(4), 447-460.
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
• Peterson, R. S., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association.
• Feather, N. T. (2000). Value, achievement, and intrinsic motivation. In S. C. G. D. (Ed.), Motivation and self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 63-84). Springer.
• Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550–562.
• Kinsey, T., & Huebner, D. (2010). Anchoring the self: A comprehensive review of theories of self-identity and their implications. Journal of Personality, 78(4), 1023-1051.
• Oliner, P., & Oliner, S. (1988). The altruistic personality: Rescuers of Jews during the Holocaust. The Free Press.
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage publications.