RTI Model: What Is RTI? The Multi-Tier Approach To Education

Rti Model what Is RTI: RTI Is The Multi Tier Approach To Early Identific

RTI (Response to Intervention) is a multi-tiered approach aimed at early identification and support of children with learning disabilities. The process emphasizes high-quality instruction combined with universal screening for all students in the general education classroom. It involves a collaborative team composed of various stakeholders, including administrators or supervisors from the school district, school psychologists (not necessarily present all the time in the school), special education teachers, general education teachers, speech therapists, and parents/guardians. Initial meetings focus on clarifying RTI processes, establishing schedules, and training staff.

The RTI process is organized into multiple tiers, each providing different levels of intervention according to student need. The first tier, Tier 1, encompasses school-wide interventions, targeting approximately 80-90% of students through universal instruction using evidence-based practices. Teachers administer screening tools like AIMweb, DIBELS, or R-CBM, which are reliable and valid assessments, completed multiple times per academic year. These assessments help identify students who demonstrate below-grade-level performance, prompting further evaluation or targeted support.

Following Tier 1, Tier 2 offers targeted group interventions affecting approximately 5-10% of students. These interventions last 6-8 weeks, with assessments conducted three times to monitor progress. General education teachers, with input from special education staff, implement small group strategies, often over 30-minute sessions, ensuring modifications are consistent with classroom curriculum but tailored to the students’ needs. Progress monitoring remains a vital component, utilizing tools that are brief, sensitive to changes, and capable of capturing student growth over time.

Tier 3 involves intensive, highly targeted support for approximately 1-5% of students. Special education teachers usually provide these interventions, which entail 45-minute sessions conducted four times weekly. The focus is on individualized instruction, with frequent evaluations every two weeks using varying methods to adapt to student responsiveness. When students do not show adequate progress across tiers despite targeted interventions, additional measures such as individualized education programs (IEPs) are considered. Ongoing assessments should be flexible, reliable, and aligned with long-term performance goals.

Transitioning students between tiers necessitates careful planning, often including bridging exercises to facilitate adaptation and ensure continuity of learning. This approach aims to prevent gaps that might hinder progress or affect student morale. Moreover, data analysis from progress monitoring should inform instructional adjustments while maintaining alertness to potential setbacks, such as social-emotional challenges or inconsistent implementation fidelity. Addressing these requires comprehensive staff training, parental involvement, and ongoing program evaluation.

Although RTI has demonstrated effectiveness in early identification and intervention, challenges such as resource constraints, potential stigmatization, or inconsistent implementation can impede its success. A critical aspect of overcoming these setbacks involves fostering a collaborative culture, providing professional development, and ensuring intervention fidelity. Careful planning for transition periods—including bridging exercises—can help students adjust smoothly across the different tiers of support, thus promoting sustained academic and behavioral growth.

References

• Benedict, A. E., Park, Y., Brownell, M. T., Lauterbach, A. A., & Kiely, M. (2013). Using lesson study to align elementary literacy instruction within the RTI framework. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(5), 22-30.
• Bayat, M., Mindes, G., & Covitt, S. (2010). What does RTI (response to intervention) look like in preschool?. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(6), 453–462.
• Pullen, P. C., & Ashworth, K. E. (2018). RTI and MTSS: Response to Intervention and Multi-Tiered Systems of Support. In Handbook of Response to Intervention and Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (pp. 45-65). Springer.
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-99.
• Family, W. (2020). Implementation of RTI in diverse educational settings. Journal of Educational Strategies, 15(2), 112-128.
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., et al. (2009). Effects of systematic synthetic phonics instruction on early reading skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(3), 243-258.
• National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2019). Critical features of RTI and MI Systems. U.S. Department of Education.
• Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2015). Behavior assessment system for children (BASC-3). Pearson.
• Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redesigning special education: Should student performance be the sole focus? The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 147-156.
• Yell, M. (2012). The law and special education. Pearson Higher Ed.