Rubric For Your Written Work Must Demonstrate Written Expres ✓ Solved

Rubric Your Written Work Must Demonstrate Written Expression In A Log

Discuss at least three (3) of the things we have learned from the history of educational technology that can help us shape today's technology uses. Also, describe some of the educational movements facilitated by technological advancements during the Mobile Technologies, Social Media, and Open Access Era.

Suppose there is a student who has failed at learning mathematics skills and is very unmotivated. What strategy would advocates of directed instruction suggest? What would constructivists recommend? Describe why it's important for teachers to assess the technological resources of students and families.

Why is trust and risk-taking important to teacher leaders? Explain why it is important for teachers to seek out and understand school policies that relate to online activity.

Discuss some of the reasons that teachers choose to use software suites over noncomputer tools. Discuss some of the common instructional integration strategies for data and analysis tools.

Compare and contrast while describing at least four selection criteria to consider when evaluating software for adoption to solve specific learning needs or knowledge objectives.

Choose one of the five affordances of web-based content resources that should be evaluated prior to use. Explain what the affordance is and how it can impact successful use of the resource with learners.

Discuss the research-based perspectives on the relationship between students' use of informal textese/textisms and students' learning and use of formal English.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Rubric Your Written Work Must Demonstrate Written Expression In A Log

Understanding the historical evolution of educational technology offers valuable insights into shaping current and future uses of technology in educational settings. Three pivotal lessons from history include the recognition of technology as an enabler rather than a replacement for effective teaching, the significance of pedagogical integration over mere technological adoption, and the importance of equitable access to technological resources. During the Mobile Technologies, Social Media, and Open Access Era, several educational movements have emerged. The movement towards personalized learning has been facilitated by mobile devices and social media platforms, enabling learners to tailor their educational experiences. The open access movement has democratized information, allowing learners and educators worldwide to access resources freely, fostering collaborative learning communities. Additionally, social media has revolutionized peer collaboration and professional development, leading to participatory and learner-centered educational movements (Johnson et al., 2020; Selwyn, 2016).

When considering a student who is unmotivated and struggling with learning mathematics, two contrasting instructional strategies emerge from different educational philosophies. Advocates of directed instruction, rooted in behaviorist approaches, would recommend explicit teaching techniques, structured practice, and step-by-step guidance to build foundational skills and foster motivation through clear expectations and immediate feedback (Rosenshine, 2012). Conversely, constructivist approaches emphasize active student engagement, exploration, and the meaningful construction of understanding through problem-solving and real-world applications (Piaget, 1952; Vygotsky, 1978). Constructivists would suggest employing collaborative activities, inquiry-based tasks, and technology tools that promote exploration to boost motivation and facilitate deeper understanding. Importantly, it is vital for teachers to assess the technological resources available to students and their families to ensure equitable access and to tailor instruction accordingly, thereby minimizing the digital divide and maximizing engagement (Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2010).

Trust and risk-taking are essential qualities for teacher leaders because they foster an environment of innovation, open communication, and professional growth. Trust allows educators to experiment with new pedagogies and technology without fear of reprimand, which is vital for continuous improvement. Risk-taking, in the context of educational leadership, encourages experimentation with novel approaches that could enhance student learning outcomes and support collaborative problem-solving (Kouzes & Posner, 2017). Additionally, understanding school policies related to online activity is critical for teachers to promote digital citizenship and ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards. Teachers must be aware of policies protecting student data privacy, appropriate online conduct, and digital safety to create secure learning environments (Harris & Stephens, 2018).

Teachers often prefer software suites over non-computer tools because of their ability to integrate multiple functionalities such as word processing, data analysis, presentation creation, and collaboration within one platform. These tools facilitate efficient instructional delivery and streamline data management. Common instructional strategies leveraging data and analysis tools include formative assessment, real-time feedback, personalized learning pathways, and formative data tracking. These strategies enable teachers to continuously monitor student progress, differentiate instruction, and make data-driven decisions to improve learning outcomes (Heritage, 2010; Floyd & Carstens, 2018).

When evaluating software for adoption, four critical criteria include usability, alignment with learning objectives, accessibility, and technical support. Usability assesses whether the software is user-friendly for students and teachers alike. Alignment ensures the software directly supports the specified learning needs or curriculum goals. Accessibility guarantees equitable access for all users, including those with disabilities or limited internet connectivity. Technical support evaluates the availability of help resources and the software’s reliability. Considering these criteria ensures that selected tools genuinely enhance learning experiences and are sustainable in the long term (Crusan, 2018; Sabers, 2019).

The affordance of interactivity in web-based content resources is a vital attribute to evaluate. Interactivity allows learners to engage actively with content through activities such as simulations, quizzes, and collaborative tasks. This affordance can significantly impact successful resource utilization by promoting engagement, reinforcing learning through practice, and accommodating multiple learning styles. When effectively designed, interactive resources foster deeper understanding and improve retention of knowledge by encouraging learners to participate actively rather than passively consuming information (Spector, 2014).

Research indicates that students' use of informal textese or textisms can influence their language skills, particularly in formal writing contexts. While some studies argue that frequent use of textisms may lead to a decline in the use of standard English by impairing vocabulary, grammar, and syntax, others suggest that informal digital communication enhances literacy skills by promoting creativity and engagement (Rampton & Bishop, 2009). The key distinction lies in the context of language use—balanced digital communication, accompanied by explicit instruction on formal language conventions, can support overall language development rather than detract from it (Kubota & Allison, 2019). Therefore, educators must recognize the nuanced relationship and foster strategies that leverage digital literacy without compromising academic language proficiency.

References

• Crusan, D. (2018). Designing and evaluating instructional software: A systematic approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(2), 251–274.
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
• Harris, J., & Stephens, A. (2018). Digital citizenship and policies in education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 34–45.
• Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Corwin Press.
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2020). The future of learning: Digital learning and educational technology. EDUCAUSE Review, 55(1), 24–33.
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations. Jossey-Bass.
• Kubota, R., & Allison, M. (2019). Digital literacy and language acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 120–135.
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
• Rampton, B., & Bishop, D. V. (2009). Computer-mediated communication and language development. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(4), 488–503.
• Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–39.
• Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Spector, J. M. (2014). Conceptualizing, researching, and evaluating complex interactivity in digital content. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 32(2), 1–16.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.