Running Head: Budget Estimation

Running Head Budget Estimation

Estimate Costs is the process of developing an approximation of the cost of resources needed to complete project work. Cost estimation accounts for each element required for the project and calculates a total amount that determines a project’s budget.

1. What does your current spend in aggregate and by resource and by month? The method used to estimate for the months other than the provided is Highest of actuals. Since we are in the 4th month of a 12-month project, we know that we are in the first quarter of the project. Generally, the first quarter comprises of the initiation and the planning phase. However, according to research, a lot of investments go into execution, monitoring, and controlling, which are generally done during the later stage of the project. Therefore, we estimated that the highest of actuals will be required for the rest of the months.

2. Do you have sufficient budget to complete the project? CTG’s labor costs represent 70 percent of all costs of the overall EIM budget of $4.5 million, which sums up to $3.15 million. According to the calculations, the estimated project cost exceeds the budgeted amount. The estimated cost without contingency reserve is approximately $3.23 million. The budget provided is $3.15 million, indicating a shortfall of about $73,000. Therefore, additional funding should be requested, considering the contingency reserve.

3. What contingency reserve should you ask for? Based on industry standards, contingency reserves are typically 5% of the total estimated cost. Given the lack of specific project data, a higher contingency of 7% is justified, amounting to approximately $225,676.4 (7% of $3.23 million). Alternatively, since the total budget is $4.5 million, 7% of the total budget is $315,000, which could be considered for contingency reserves to cover uncertainties.

4. What are your assumptions about your estimates? We assume that the estimates will hold true until project completion without significant changes. The contingency reserve is assumed to be 7% of total costs, providing a buffer for unforeseen expenses. Labor costs and expenses for the current month are not yet fully accounted for; hence, the highest actuals are used to estimate future costs. Lastly, we assume that the actual expenses recorded so far accurately represent resource consumption and that fluctuations in costs are minimal moving forward.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of budget estimation is a critical component of project management, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and financial risks are mitigated. In the context of extensive projects such as Healthcare Partners' Enterprise Information Management (EIM) system, determining current spending, assessing sufficiency of the budget, and planning for contingency reserves are essential tasks that influence project success. This paper analyzes the current expenditure, evaluates whether the existing budget is adequate, proposes appropriate contingency reserves, and discusses underlying assumptions influencing these estimates.

Analysis of Current Spending

Based on the invoices up to the fourth month, the aggregate expenditure for the EIM project amounts to approximately $642,599.35. This cumulative cost covers various resources and expenses such as personnel costs, travel, accommodations, and miscellaneous charges across different months. Disaggregating this total by resource reveals that the highest spenders are project team members like Anderson Robert, Hall Kreg, and Walton John, each incurring expenditures exceeding $40,000 within the period. Monthly breakdowns show a fluctuating pattern, with August exhibiting the highest expenses due to increased travel and miscellaneous costs, likely resulting from project meetings, site visits, or other critical activities.

Specifically, resource-based costs indicate that Anderson Robert’s expenditure, including allowances and miscellaneous expenses, totaled around $45,647 for the period; Hall Kreg’s expenses summed to approximately $43,519; and Walton John’s costs were close to $45,454. Other resources like Herman Franklin, Jilla Sheetal, and Lemke Denise contributed significantly but at lower levels. These figures suggest that resource utilization and associated costs are broadly aligned with project progress, although the high costs in certain months point to periods of intensive activity requiring detailed review.

Sufficiency of Budget for Project Completion

The initial budget allocated for the EIM project was $4.5 million, with 70% designated for resource costs, amounting to $3.15 million. The recent expenditure data suggests that costs for four months have already reached approximately $642,599.35, which extrapolated across the remaining months indicates a concerning potential overshoot of the available budget.

With an average monthly expenditure of about $160,649.83 based on recent data, projecting this on the remaining eight months could lead to total costs exceeding the allocated resources considerably. To avoid budget overruns, a conservative approach assigns the highest observed monthly costs—around $303,653.28—to remaining months, which results in a projected total expenditure of approximately $2.73 million for the remaining period. Combining this with the current spend results in an estimated total cost surpassing the original budget of $4.5 million, indicating that additional funds are necessary to complete the project successfully. This analysis underscores the importance of strict cost control measures and the potential need for increased funding to mitigate financial risks.

Contingency Reserve Allocation

In project management, contingency reserves are essential to cover unforeseen expenses and variances. Industry standards recommend setting aside 5% of the estimated project costs; however, in scenarios with uncertain data or early-stage estimates, a higher percentage—such as 7%—is justified. Calculations based on partial data suggest that a contingency reserve of around $225,676, representing about 7% of the estimated costs, would be appropriate. Alternatively, considering the total budget, 7% of $4.5 million equals approximately $315,000, providing a more substantial cushion.

Allocating such reserves ensures that unforeseen issues—delays, scope changes, or resource cost escalations—can be managed without derailing project timelines or exceeding budgets. Furthermore, maintaining a contingency fund of roughly 7% aligns with best practices, allowing sufficient flexibility to address uncertainties while maintaining financial discipline.

Assumptions Underpinning Estimates

Several assumptions underpin the current financial estimates for the EIM project. Firstly, it is assumed that the current expense patterns, particularly in August, are representative of future costs, allowing for extrapolation to subsequent months. This presumption relies on stable project activities and resource engagement levels. Secondly, the estimates assume that miscellaneous and travel expenses remain consistent relative to resource utilization; significant deviations could necessitate adjustments.

Thirdly, the contingency reserve percentage—set at 7%—is presumed sufficient given the current project scope and known uncertainties. This assumption presumes no extraordinary scope changes or unforeseen technical challenges. Fourthly, it is assumed that labor costs and expenses are accurately recorded and reflect actual resource consumption; discrepancies might lead to misestimations. Lastly, the analysis presumes that management will approve the proposed contingency reserves and additional funding if required, ensuring project continuity.

Conclusion

Effective budget management in large-scale projects like the Healthcare Partners EIM system necessitates careful assessment of current expenditures, prudent estimation of future costs, and strategic allocation of contingency reserves. The analysis reveals that current spending trends indicate potential budget overruns if additional funds are not secured. Appropriately sizable contingency reserves and management buy-in are vital to address uncertainties and ensure successful project delivery. Adhering to sound estimation assumptions and continuously monitoring expenditures will further aid in maintaining financial control and achieving project objectives within approved budgets.

References

• Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2018). Project management: The managerial process (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (6th ed.). PMI.
• Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., & Mantel, S. J. (2017). Project management in practice (6th ed.). Wiley.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information technology project management (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Wiley.
• PMI Talent Triangle®. (2020). Integrating technical project management, leadership, and strategic and business management. PMI.
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project management jumpstart. Wiley.
• Zwikael, O., & Smyrk, J. (2019). Project planning and control. Wiley.
• Gido, J., & Clements, J. (2018). Successful project management. Cengage Learning.
• Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of project management. AMACOM.