Running Head Research Analysis

Running Head Research Analysis

RESEARCH ANALYSIS 17 Research Analysis Natasha R. Chalk University of Phoenix In the latter part of the 19th century, the Coca-Cola Company began its existence. Coca-Cola is one of the foremost global producers and disseminators of soft drink beverages, syrups, and concentrates. Coca-Cola maintains a presence in more than two hundred nations and is world-renowned for its innovative beverage, Coca-Cola. The brand has been and has expanded to encompass greater than two hundred and thirty distinct brands (Pähler, 2017; Telekunta & Rathore, 2018).

The Coca-Cola organization has central offices in Atlanta, Georgia. The subsidiaries of Coca-Cola provide gainful employment for more than thirty thousand families worldwide. Coca-Cola derives 70% of its profits and corporate volume from international commerce. The global presence of Coca-Cola is its primary strengths (Levy & Young, 2004). The US soft beverage market has three primary actors, which are PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, and Cadbury-Schweppes.

Over 40% of the domestic market pertains to Coca-Cola, in comparison to 8% market share held by Cadbury-Schweppes and 21% maintained by PepsiCo. Although Coca-Cola is an international brand, it maintains an emphasis on the local domestic market. Research has shown a clear relationship between the context of organizations' market percentage and the degree of viability (Pähler, 2017; Telekunta & Rathore, 2018). Studies show there are four attributes why the market percentage is associated with enhanced viability. First of all, the economies of scale combined with an augmentation of experiential knowledge make the most efficient optimization a production technology and techniques.

Second, the clients are adverse to the risks and will consequently remain with the primary market actors resulting from prevailing comfort factors. Third, attributed to presence and leadership sustained by Coca-Cola in the marketplace, the organization can apply its position towards enabling the negotiation decrease pricing in the supply chain. The Coca-Cola organization also has the capacity of decreasing pricing for the products it manufactures. The fourth attribute is that the leader in the marketplace has exceptional administrative units with effective industrial processes in all facets of the organization. The Coca-Cola organization applies the guideline of an adapt stand incorporation (Levy & Young, 2004).

Coca-Cola’s success represents advocacy of the adaptive stand strategy. Porter’s study considers the environmental factors influencing the competitive position of market actors. Five forces are having a competitive nature governing competitiveness: a. The introduction of a market actor, b. The menace of replacement goods with competitive substitutes, c. The negotiating and bargaining capacity of consumers, d. The market positioning and bargaining ability of office supplies, e. The competitiveness of the industry (Levy & Young, 2004). Coca-Cola operates within an oligopoly market structure, where a few large players dominate sales. In the US soft drink market, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Cadbury-Schweppes are primary actors.

An oligopoly typically features limited small competitors due to high barriers to entry created by dominant firms. The major players control more than half of the sales volume. Product differentiation is a key strategy in such markets, allowing firms to compete without necessarily lowering prices (Pähler, 2017; Telekunta & Rathore, 2018). Coca-Cola’s distribution relies on a hybrid system of company-owned bottling plants, independent bottlers, retailers, and wholesalers, which has been in place since the late 19th century. This franchise model enables rapid scaling and cost savings in manufacturing and distribution (Pähler, 2017; Telekunta & Rathore, 2018).

The economic cycle describes fluctuations in economic activity, trade, and production, characterized by four phases: trough, contraction, peak, and expansion (Federal Reserve Bank, 2018). Currently, the US economy is in the expansion phase, with real GDP increasing at a steady rate, supported by rising employment and investment figures. The pace of growth and other indicators such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Leading Economic Index (LEI) offer insights into future economic trends (Federal Reserve Bank, 2018). The LEI, in particular, is a useful predictor of recessionary periods, although it is not infallible. Recent data suggest continued growth into 2018, although decelerations in some sectors hint at potential adjustments ahead (Federal Reserve Bank, 2018).

Inflation, as measured by CPI, impacts consumers’ purchasing power and influences business strategies. The CPI compares the cost of a fixed basket of goods over time, adjusted for inflation, with the current cost indicating the degree of inflation (Federal Reserve Bank, 2018). Federal Reserve monetary policy, especially the federal funds rate and the prime rate, directly affects economic activity and inflation. The federal funds rate influences overnight lending, while the prime rate affects consumer interest rates on loans and credit (Federal Reserve Bank, 2018). For a company like Coca-Cola, changes in interest rates can impact operational costs and consumer spending patterns.

Production costs for a liter of Coca-Cola are approximately $0.15, covering labor, water, concentrate, and packaging. Declining soft drink consumption in the US has led to decreased revenues for Coca-Cola, which fell from an all-time high of $46 billion in 2014 to about $35.41 billion in 2017 (Statista, 2018). To remain competitive, Coca-Cola has adopted strategies such as refranchising bottling operations, diversifying product lines into energy drinks, bottled coffee, and bottled water, and optimizing its marketing efforts (Coca-Cola, 2018). Cost management and product innovation are essential for adapting to changing consumer preferences and market dynamics.

In conclusion, Coca-Cola's long-standing market presence and strategic adaptations exemplify effective responses within an oligopolistic industry structure. As market conditions evolve, focusing on diversification and operational efficiency will be critical for sustaining profitability. Additionally, macroeconomic indicators such as GDP growth, inflation, and interest rates must be monitored to anticipate market shifts. These insights support the ongoing need for strategic agility in a competitive global environment.

Paper For Above instruction

The interaction between global market structures and economic cycles plays a significant role in determining the strategies employed by major corporations like Coca-Cola. As a longstanding leader in the soft drink industry, Coca-Cola’s success hinges on its ability to adapt to changing economic conditions, market competition, and consumer preferences. Operating within an oligopoly, Coca-Cola benefits from high barriers to entry that limit competition and enable product differentiation, allowing it to maintain a substantial market share both domestically and internationally. Strategic distribution through franchised bottling systems enhances its operational scalability and cost-efficiency, positioning the company favorably in a competitive landscape (Pähler, 2017; Telekunta & Rathore, 2018).

The economic cycle, characterized by phases of expansion and contraction, influences corporate strategies and profitability. Currently, the US economy is experiencing an expansion indicated by rising GDP, employment, and investment. These macroeconomic indicators directly impact consumer spending and, consequently, Coca-Cola's revenues. However, shifts such as declining beverage consumption necessitate diversification and innovation to sustain growth. Coca-Cola’s strategic shift into energy drinks, bottled coffee, and bottled water reflects an adaptive response to these macroeconomic trends and changing consumer preferences (Federal Reserve Bank, 2018).

Understanding the macroeconomic environment requires analyzing key indicators such as GDP, CPI, and interest rates. The CPI measures inflation's impact on consumers’ purchasing power, guiding companies in pricing strategies. Meanwhile, the federal funds rate and prime rate influence borrowing costs and investment opportunities, directly affecting production costs and consumer credit. For example, increased interest rates can raise borrowing costs, potentially dampening consumer spending on non-essential goods like soft drinks (Federal Reserve Bank, 2018). Such macroeconomic forces underscore the importance of strategic agility for firms operating in complex economic environments.

Furthermore, the global landscape is increasingly moving toward supranational cooperation on critical issues such as trade, climate change, and economic stability. International organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) aim to facilitate free trade by reducing tariffs and dispute resolution, fostering a more level playing field for multilateral trade (Roskin et al., 2014). For instance, WTO agreements have helped reduce trade barriers for soft drink exports, enabling Coca-Cola to expand its global footprint. However, this form of supranational governance raises questions about sovereignty, as nations sometimes cede control over certain economic policies to participate in these international frameworks.

While supranational cooperation can promote economic stability and growth through harmonized standards and dispute resolution, it arguably impairs national sovereignty by limiting a country's independent policymaking ability. For example, trade agreements such as NAFTA or the EU's single market entail concessions of regulatory sovereignty, which some political actors perceive as undermining national interests. However, proponents argue that such cooperation is essential for tackling transnational issues like climate change or economic crises, which cannot be effectively managed by individual states alone (Roskin et al., 2014).

In conclusion, global economic cooperation offers both opportunities and challenges. It enables companies like Coca-Cola to access new markets and benefit from reduced trade barriers, fostering growth amid economic cycles. Nonetheless, the necessity for countries to balance sovereignty with international obligations remains contentious. Strategic engagement in supranational institutions must therefore be navigated carefully, ensuring that national interests are protected while promoting global stability and prosperity.

References

  • Coca-Cola. (2018). Archive of quarterly earnings releases. Coca-Cola. Retrieved from https://www.coca-colacompany.com/research/earnings
  • Federal Reserve Bank. (2018). Bank Prime Loan Rate. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FEDFUNDS
  • Federal Reserve Bank. (2018). Consumer Price Index Total All Items for the United States. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL
  • Federal Reserve Bank. (2018). Effective Federal Funds Rate. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FEDFUNDS
  • Federal Reserve Bank. (2018). Inflation Consumer Prices for the US. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL
  • Federal Reserve Bank. (2018). Real Gross Domestic Product. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDP
  • Roskin, M. G., Cord, R. L., Medeiros, J. A., & Jones, W. S. (2014). Political science: An introduction (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Statista. (2018). Coca-Cola Company - Statistics and Facts. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/1472/coca-cola
  • Statista. (2018). Soft drinks. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/185667/soft-drinks-revenue-in-the-us/
  • Telekunta, R., & Rathore, S. P. S. (2016). The analysis of 4p's of marketing on Coca-Cola and RC Cola with the objective to find why RC Cola had failed in the international markets. TRANS Asian Journal of Marketing & Management Research, 5(12), 50-60.

Related Assignments