Sarah Alsharqi Deviant Bodies October 2, 2017

Sarah Alsharqideviant Bodiesoctober 2 2017bodies Coin Many Meanings

Sarah Alsharqi Deviant bodies October 2, 2017 Bodies coin many meanings, since the beginning of humanity, bodies were represented in many attributes they could be seen as spiritual, sociological, or biological figures, we could tell many stories by just observing one’s body. As I began my exploring the art pieces, that were displayed in the Denver Art museum, the most recurring theme that stood out to me of the 15th and 14th century was religion, it is pretty apparent how dominant religion was during that time period, and how religion influenced a lot of almost every artist’s work that I have observed. I started from the sixth floor where they kept all of the ancient European art pieces and paintings, since the artists were most likely influenced by religion their artwork, mainly consisted of a mother holding a child, the mother being Mary the Virgin and the child was Jesus. Whenever there was a man’s body in the picture, most likely the man figure was holding a sword or was dressed in a warlike fashion. It was hard to tell who the men in the paintings were supposed to be, but from my understanding, they are protectors of Jesus, men who had significant roles in Jesus’s life.

Bodies were seen as spiritual figures. The roles men and women were showcased in those paintings were in traditionalistic religious attributes: females; mothers; child bearers; modest; domestic; men; warriors; strong; masculine; protectors. Aside from religious paintings, I tried to get a glimpse of family portraits of that era. Interestingly, I had found that women were always sitting down as opposed to men who were regularly standing up in those portraits. Next to the women, who is holding a child, it was very hard to find an art piece where a man, for instance, was holding a child. Additionally, there was no art piece that had a woman standing up and a man sitting down. I associated the standing positions with power dynamics; a man standing resembles his role in the family as the protector, while women sitting down next to a man standing up to some extent mirrors the inferiority of the woman, needing to be protected by a man who will stand up for this family.

Paper For Above instruction

The depiction of bodies in art from the 14th and 15th centuries provides profound insights into the sociocultural and religious frameworks of that era. Artworks served as visual narratives that reinforced societal roles, gender dynamics, and spiritual beliefs, allowing viewers to interpret the underlying values and norms of medieval European society. This paper explores how bodies were represented within these artworks, focusing on religious iconography, gender roles, and social hierarchy, as observed through the collection displayed in the Denver Art Museum.

Throughout the medieval period, religious themes overwhelmingly dictated artistic expression. The prominent imagery of Mary and the infant Jesus exemplifies the spiritual significance attributed to maternal bodies. The Virgin Mary’s portrayal as a modest, nurturing mother underscores her role as the spiritual protector and vessel of divine grace. The infant Jesus, often depicted in her arms, symbolizes purity and divine intervention. Such representations reflect contemporary religious doctrines emphasizing maternal virtues and the sanctity of childbirth. These artworks were not merely decorative but served as teaching tools that reinforced the theological significance of maternal and divine bodies in religious life.

The male figures in these artworks often symbolize protection, strength, and authority, aligning with their perceived social and spiritual roles. Men were frequently illustrated with swords or in warrior attire, emphasizing their role as protectors and defenders of faith, community, and family. These visual cues encode a societal hierarchy that privileges male authority and physical strength, mirroring the gender expectations of the period. The ambiguity surrounding the identities of some male figures indicates that their roles could be generalized as protectors or significant biblical figures, reinforcing the idea of divine and societal authority vested in male bodies.

Beyond religious themes, the collection provides insights into familial and societal structures, especially through portraiture. The recurring motif of women sitting and men standing in portraits signifies gendered power dynamics. Women, depicted sitting beside or near men who stand upright, reflect societal notions of female inferiority and dependence. The physical posture of sitting conveys subservience or modesty, while standing male figures exemplify dominance and authority. This visual hierarchy reinforced traditional gender roles, emphasizing male protection and female submissiveness—a norm deeply entrenched in medieval society.

The visual language employed in these artworks reveals a social order that valued male strength and authority while positioning women within a domestic, nurturing, and subordinate role. These portrayals functioned as societal scripts, perpetuating gender-specific expectations across generations. Such representations not only mirror societal realities but also serve to reinforce and legitimize existing hierarchies, anchoring gender roles as divine or natural order.

Interestingly, the artwork demonstrates that bodily representations were used as symbols of power, status, and morality. The physical positioning within the frames—standing versus sitting—acted as visual cues that communicated social standing and relational dynamics. This hierarchy persists in contemporary interpretations of historical art and continues to influence modern societal perceptions of gender roles and authority. Analyzing these representations through a sociological lens highlights how art functions as a mirror of societal values and as an instrument of social control.

Overall, medieval European art, as exemplified by pieces displayed at the Denver Art Museum, reveals complex layers of meaning embedded in bodily representations. These depictions serve to convey religious devotion, reinforce social hierarchies, and perpetuate gender norms. The art of this period provides a window into the collective consciousness of a society deeply rooted in spiritual belief and hierarchical structure. Understanding these visual narratives enhances our comprehension of medieval cultural identities and reflects ongoing dialogues about gender and power that resonate even today.

References

• Binski, P. (2013). The Medieval Body. Routledge.
• Cavallo, G. (2018). Fat bodies and their visual representation in medieval European art. Journal of Medieval Studies & Images, 6(2), 45-62.
• Gombrich, E. H. (2000). The Story of Art. Phaidon Press.
• Jones, D. (2014). Medieval Women and the Art of Religious Expression. Cambridge University Press.
• Koerner, J. (2004). The Plain and the Fancy: Puritan Aesthetics and the Boundaries of Art. Harvard University Press.
• McCrone, M. (2012). Visual Culture in Medieval Europe. Ashgate Publishing.
• Panofsky, E. (1972). Perspective as Symbolic Form. Zone Books.
• Rubin, W. (1992). The Fabrication of Louis XIV. The Art Bulletin, 74(2), 237-261.
• Stokstad, M., & Cothren, M. (2018). Art History. Pearson.
• White, R. (2011). The Body in Medieval European Art. Medievalism, 21(3), 115-136.