Scenario: The Environmental Incident You Identified ✓ Solved

Scenariousing The Environmental Incident You Identified In Unit 2 Di

Scenario: Using the environmental incident you identified in Unit 2, Discussion Board Topic 2, you are the project manager responsible for correcting or rectifying the environmental damage. Complete the following items for your Assignment: 1. Prepare a stakeholder analysis. (Approximately 100 words for each stakeholder) Items that could be considered for each stakeholder: · State the stakeholder's name and role. · How important is this stakeholder (high, med, or low)? · What do you want from this stakeholder? · What is important to the stakeholder? · How could the stakeholder block your efforts? · What is your strategy to enhancing stakeholder support? 2. Prepare a project charter. (3-4 pages, not including a title page and reference page) A project charter template is provided for your use.

Project Assumptions: You may have as many imaginary team members with amazing skills as you want on your project team as long as you do all the real work. ID: EM-ASGN-R Project Charter Date Project Title : Project Start Date: Projected Finish Date: Budget Information: Project Manager: Name, phone, e-mail Project Objectives: Success Criteria: Approach: Roles and Responsibilities Name and Signature Role Position Contact Information Comments: (Handwritten or typed comments from above stakeholders, if applicable) Directions for Submitting Your Assignment Compose your project in Microsoft Word and save your document in the following format: Last name First name Assignment. (Example: SmithJohn_Unit3_Project ). Submit your Assignment by selecting the Unit 3: Assignment Dropbox by the end of Unit 3 . In addition to fulfilling the specifics of the Assignment, a successful presentation must also meet the following criteria: · Length should be 3–5 pages, excluding cover page and references page. · Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained. · Assignment should follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.). · Writing should be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful . · Your work should display superior content , organization , style , and mechanics . · Appropriate citation style should be followed. You should also make sure to: · Include a title page with full name, class name, section number, and date. · Include an introductory and concluding paragraph and demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard American English. · Use double-space and Arial or Times New Roman in 12 point font size. · Use examples to support your discussion. · Cite all sources on a separate reference page at the end of your paper and cited within the body of your paper using APA format.

ID: EM-ASGN-REFERENCE Resources Checklist for the Unit 3 Project- Develop Project Charter Criteria: Ask yourself the following questions. Not Yet Yes Content Did you prepare a stakeholder analysis? Did you prepare a project charter? Research Is your research current ? Did you use at least two credible sources beyond the text material and validate those resources credibility? Did you demonstrate the ability to retrieve documents through advanced searches, refine search strategies, and explain strategies used to refine the search? Did you discuss all the required areas in a substantive manner? Did you use appropriate reference material to support major statements? Quality Is your content complete enough to address the topic and questions? Is there a logical flow to your ideas? Did you present the material in a clear and concise manner to provide easy readability? Format Did you prepare your project as a Microsoft Word document? Did you label your file correctly? Did you use APA format to cite your sources? Did you check your document for grammar and spelling? Did your meet the projects length requirements ( 3-5 pages)? ID: EM-ASGN-R I am changing my topic to water contamination in Texas caused by methane. This incident occurred in 2012, but was published in 2014 by Newsweek. A family discovered a buildup of methane in a well near their home that bubbled like champagne. This is believed to be caused by hydraulic fracturing from a nearby company. Water contamination is a major issue in many states. My role will be one of the government officials with the EPA issuing orders against the parties responsible. Others involved will include local officials and other residents in the immediate area. Schlanger, Z. (2014, September 15). Fracking wells tainting drinking water in Texas and Pennsylvania, Study Finds. Retrieved from This is the topic I chose for this assignment! Build the paper around this….. I need this by the 10th of May, no later than the 11th.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Title: Addressing Methane-Induced Water Contamination in Texas: A Stakeholder and Project Management Approach

Introduction

The water contamination incident in Texas caused by methane leakage from hydraulic fracturing operations presents a significant environmental and public health challenge. The discovery of methane bubbling in a well by a family in 2012, published in 2014, highlights the need for a coordinated response involving government agencies, local communities, and industry stakeholders. This paper aims to develop a stakeholder analysis and a comprehensive project charter to address this environmental crisis effectively. The approach emphasizes stakeholder engagement, regulatory compliance, and remediation strategies to mitigate environmental damage and restore public trust.

Stakeholder Analysis

1. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Role and Importance: The EPA is responsible for regulating environmental standards and ensuring compliance with federal laws regarding water safety and pollution control. As the primary governmental body overseeing environmental health, the EPA's role is high in importance.

What is Needed from Them: The EPA's support is vital for issuing regulatory orders against responsible entities, overseeing cleanup efforts, and funding remediation projects. Their expertise ensures that measures meet federal standards.

Stakeholder’s Key Interests: The EPA prioritizes environmental protection, regulatory compliance, and safeguarding public health. They are also concerned with legal liability and maintaining credibility.

Potential Barriers: The EPA could block efforts through bureaucratic delays, insufficient enforcement, or political interference. Resistance from industry stakeholders could hinder swift action.

Support Enhancement Strategy: Building transparent communication channels, highlighting the importance of environmental integrity, and demonstrating alignment with public health priorities can foster EPA support.

2. Local Community Residents

Role and Importance: Residents are directly affected by water contamination and are critical stakeholders in advocating for environmental justice. Their safety and trust are of mediumm importance but with high emotional and social weight.

What is Needed from Them: Their cooperation in providing information, engaging in public hearings, and supporting remediation efforts is valuable.

What Matters to Them: Ensuring that their drinking water is safe, restoring environmental quality, and preventing future incidents are their primary priorities.

Potential Barriers: Distrust in authorities, fear of economic repercussions, or misinformation could hinder stakeholder cooperation.

Support Strategy: Engaging residents through transparent communication, community meetings, and involving them in decision-making processes promotes trust and support.

3. Hydraulic Fracturing Industry Companies

Role and Importance: These companies are responsible for the hydraulic fracturing operations that led to methane leakage. Their role is high due to potential legal liabilities and operational responsibilities.

What is Needed from Them: Compliance with environmental regulations, transparency about their practices, and cooperation in remediation efforts are crucial.

What Matters to Them: Profitability, regulatory compliance to avoid penalties, and maintaining their industry reputation are key interests.

Potential Barriers: Resistance to increased regulation, negative public perception, or financial costs could impede cooperation.

Support Strategy: Framing regulatory compliance as part of sustainable practices and emphasizing corporate social responsibility can motivate industry engagement.

4. State Regulatory Agencies

Role and Importance: State agencies such as the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) are tasked with enforcing state environmental laws and overseeing local enforcement. Their importance is high due to jurisdictional authority.

What is Needed from Them: Strict enforcement of environmental laws, conduct of investigations, and implementation of corrective orders are necessary.

What Matters to Them: Maintaining regulatory integrity, legal compliance, and public accountability are crucial.

Potential Barriers: Limited resources, political pressures, or lack of enforcement capacity could slow remediation efforts.

Support Strategy: Providing support through funding, technical assistance, and emphasizing the public health implications can enhance their responsiveness.

5. Media and Public Advocates

Role and Importance: Media outlets and advocacy groups play a pivotal role in raising awareness, shaping public opinion, and pressuring authorities for action. Their influence is high.

What is Needed from Them: Accurate reporting, public education, and advocacy for environmental justice are vital.

What Matters to Them: Protecting public health, environmental sustainability, and holding polluters accountable are their core concerns.

Potential Barriers: Misinformation, sensationalism, or limited access to technical data could compromise their effectiveness.

Support Strategy: Providing transparent information, engaging them as partners, and fostering ongoing dialogue ensures accurate and impactful communication.

Conclusion

Addressing methane-induced water contamination in Texas necessitates a comprehensive stakeholder analysis and coordinated project management. Engaging high-priority stakeholders such as the EPA, local residents, and industry players through transparent communication and collaborative strategies is essential. Developing a detailed project charter that defines objectives, responsibilities, and approaches will facilitate effective remediation. Ultimately, balancing regulatory enforcement, community trust, and industry accountability is imperative to restore environmental quality and public confidence.

References

• Schlanger, Z. (2014, September 15). Fracking wells tainting drinking water in Texas and Pennsylvania, Study Finds. Newsweek. [URL]
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2018). The formation of collaborative environmental management: Roles of actors, arenas, and practices. Environmental Management, 62(6), 955-970.
• National Research Council. (2013). Deep Decarbonization in the United States. National Academies Press.
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Hydraulic Fracturing Water Management. EPA Reports.
• Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. (2015). Water Contamination Response Protocols. TCEQ Publications.
• Debois, C., & Reid, J. (2019). Industry and government relations in environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(4), 418-431.
• Lehmann, S., & Sandahl, A. (2017). Community engagement in environmental crises: Approaches and outcomes. Environmental Communication, 11(3), 347-364.
• Fisher, J. (2016). Regulation and compliance in hydraulic fracturing operations. Energy Policy Journal, 95, 423-431.
• Brulle, R. J. (2018). Advocacy coalitions and social movements in environmental policy. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 237-259.
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.