Selecting A Company Due Week 2 And Worth 60 Points

Selecting A Companydue Week 2 And Worth 60 Pointschoose

Choose an organization with which you are familiar or one in which you have an interest. Research and analyze the organization’s Human Resource Management programs, policies, procedures, or initiatives. Evaluate their effectiveness and select a program, policy, procedure or initiative which you believe needs to be changed. Write a one (1) page paper in which you: Assess the current Human Resource programs, policies, procedures, or initiatives in terms of effectiveness. Hypothesize the changes that require improvement.

Paper For Above instruction

Organizations continually evolve their human resource management (HRM) strategies to adapt to dynamic business environments, enhance employee engagement, and improve overall organizational performance. Analyzing a specific organization’s HRM practices provides insights into their effectiveness and highlights areas necessitating change. In this context, I have selected XYZ Corporation, a mid-sized technology firm known for its innovative products and dedicated workforce, to evaluate its current HR initiatives and propose necessary improvements.

XYZ Corporation has implemented several HR policies aimed at fostering a positive work environment, attracting talent, and ensuring compliance with employment regulations. Notably, their employee onboarding program, performance appraisal system, and wellness initiatives are noteworthy. The onboarding process is comprehensive, offering new employees a structured orientation to acclimate them to company culture and expectations. Performance appraisals are conducted biannually, emphasizing goal-setting and feedback, which have generally contributed to improved employee performance and engagement. Additionally, wellness programs such as fitness subsidies and mental health resources reflect the company’s commitment to employee well-being.

Despite these strengths, certain HR practices at XYZ Corporation reveal areas for enhancement. While the onboarding program effectively introduces new hires to the company’s culture, it lacks ongoing support and integration strategies post-induction. This limitation can lead to reduced new hire engagement and productivity in the critical first months of employment. Similarly, the performance management system relies heavily on subjective evaluations, which can result in inconsistencies and perceived biases, thus affecting employee morale and development opportunities. Furthermore, the wellness initiatives, although beneficial, are underutilized, indicating possible deficiencies in communication and engagement strategies to encourage wider participation.

Based on this evaluation, a primary area requiring change is the performance appraisal process. Transitioning to a continuous feedback model integrated with real-time recognition tools could mitigate the limitations of biannual reviews. Such a shift promotes ongoing development, fosters transparency, and aligns individual goals with organizational objectives more effectively. Implementing 360-degree feedback mechanisms can also provide a more comprehensive view of employee performance, reduce biases, and support fairer assessments.

Another aspect requiring modification is the onboarding process. Introducing a structured mentorship program that extends beyond initial orientation can help new employees integrate better into the corporate culture, build relationships, and accelerate productivity. Utilizing technology platforms for onboarding can facilitate personalized learning paths and regular check-ins, ensuring sustained engagement.

Finally, to enhance participation in wellness programs, XYZ Corporation should develop targeted communication campaigns emphasizing the benefits and encouraging ongoing involvement. Creating peer-led wellness groups or challenges can foster community spirit and motivate employees to prioritize their health proactively.

In conclusion, while XYZ Corporation demonstrates commendable HRM practices, strategic enhancements are necessary to optimize employee engagement, performance, and well-being. Transitioning to continuous performance feedback, expanding onboarding support, and revitalizing wellness initiatives can significantly improve organizational effectiveness. Recognizing the importance of adaptive HR strategies aligns with the organization’s commitment to fostering a motivated, healthy, and high-performing workforce.

References

• Armstrong, M. (2020). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page.
• Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organization Development and Change. Cengage Learning.
• Dessler, G. (2019). Human Resource Management. Pearson.
• Humphrey, S. E., & McNulty, P. A. (2013). Managing Organizational Change: A multiple case study analysis. Journal of Change Management, 13(2), 147–165.
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Levine, D. I. (2015). The Future of Employee Engagement. Harvard Business Review, 93(4), 22–25.
• Schraeder, M., et al. (2019). Human Resource Development: The Key to Organizational Success. Routledge.
• Ulrich, D., et al. (2017). HR Competencies: Mastery at the Intersection of People and Business. Society for Human Resource Management.
• Walker, R. M. (2021). Strategic Human Resource Management. Routledge.
• Worley, C. G., & Cummings, T. G. (2014). Organization Development & Change. Cengage Learning.