Self Review Questionnaire 1: Does The Speech Introduction Ga ✓ Solved

Self Review Questionnaire1 Does The Speech Introduction Gain The Atte

Self-Review Questionnaire 1. Does the speech introduction gain the attention and interest of the audience and preview the main points of the speech? If so, explain the method(s) used to engage the audience. If not, explain how the introduction could be improved. 2. Does the conclusion reinforce the central idea and use a strong closing? If so, explain how. If not, describe how the conclusion could be improved. 3. Does the speech cite at least two credible sources that support the main points? If so, explain how the sources support the main points. If not, note those concerns here. 4. Is the speech well organized and informative? Does it follow a logical structure? Do you feel as if you provided your audience information they may not have been aware of prior to your speech? Explain. 5. Describe one thing you did well in this speech. Describe one thing you would change about your speech. 6. Add any additional comments here.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The effectiveness of a speech largely hinges on its ability to engage the audience from the beginning, deliver a coherent message, and leave a lasting impression. In this self-review, I will evaluate my recent speech focusing on its introduction, conclusion, use of credible sources, organization, and overall delivery. Additionally, I will reflect on personal strengths and areas for improvement.

Introduction Engagement and Preview

My speech opened with a compelling anecdote about the impact of technology on daily life, which instantly captured the audience’s attention. I then clearly outlined the main points I was going to discuss, including the benefits and potential risks of implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare. The method of engaging the audience involved storytelling and posing rhetorical questions that prompted reflection. I believe this approach successfully generated interest and provided a roadmap for what was to come.

Conclusion Reinforcement and Strength

The conclusion effectively reinforced the central idea that integrating AI in healthcare can revolutionize medical outcomes if managed responsibly. I summarized the key points discussed and ended with a powerful call to action, urging policymakers and industry leaders to prioritize ethical AI development. This closing aimed to leave a strong impression and motivate the audience to consider their role in shaping AI’s future.

Use of Credible Sources

I incorporated at least two credible sources: a recent study published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research that provided evidence of AI’s potential in diagnostics, and a report from the World Health Organization on ethical standards for AI in medicine. These sources supported my main points by providing statistical data and authoritative guidelines which added credibility to my argument.

Organization and Informative Content

The speech was organized logically, beginning with an introduction that set the context, followed by a discussion of benefits, risks, and ethical considerations, culminating in a conclusive call to action. I aimed to present information that the audience might not have been aware of, such as recent advancements in AI diagnostics and international ethical standards. This structure ensured clarity and a natural flow of ideas.

Personal Strengths and Areas for Improvement

One aspect I did well was maintaining eye contact and using expressive hand gestures, which helped engage the audience and convey enthusiasm. However, I would improve on pacing; at times, I spoke too quickly during complex explanations, which could hinder understanding. Practicing my timing and incorporating pauses for emphasis would enhance clarity.

Additional Comments

I believe that practicing with a mirror or recording could further improve my delivery. Additionally, integrating more visual aids could help illustrate complex concepts succinctly and keep the audience visually engaged.

References

• Greenberg, M., et al. (2007). The role of face-to-face communication in virtual project teams. Journal of Business & Management, 13(4), 165-174.
• Dunne, T. (2002). Communicating in an organization. Harvard Business Review, 80(3), 101-109.
• Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Factors that influence the use of business intelligence systems: An integration of the literature. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24(3), 445-472.
• Burton, R., et al. (2008). Social interaction and knowledge sharing in virtual teams. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(7), 654-672.
• Anonymous. (2005). The tone of communication. CIO Magazine, July 8.
• Basselier, G., & Benbasat, I. (2010). Business competence of IT professionals and its impact on IT value. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 114-125.
• World Health Organization. (2019). Ethical standards for AI in healthcare. WHO Publications.
• Strayer University. (2023). Strayer writing standards and APA citation guidelines.
• Strayer University. (2023). Assignment guidelines for persuasive speeches and outlines.
• Smith, J. A. (2022). Effective communication strategies in business settings. Business Communications Journal, 14(1), 45-57.