To Prepare For This Discussion, Review The Article On Innova ✓ Solved

To prepare for this Discussion review The Article Innovations In Cor

To prepare for this Discussion: Review the article, “Innovations in Correctional Assessment and Treatment.” Focus on specific areas of mental health assessment and treatment in correctional settings, how these areas are studied, and the results. Think about how you might apply the results of this study in a correctional setting. Review this week's DVD program, "Application of Psychological Research - Correctional Settings." Consider the types of forensic psychology research questions that are relevant to correctional settings. Using the Walden Library, select a psychological research study conducted in a correctional setting. Review the section(s) on methods and results of the research study you selected and think about what you believe to be the most important contributions of the study for use in correctional settings. Consider how a forensic psychology professional might apply the results of this study in a correctional setting. With these thoughts in mind: Post by Day 4 a brief description of the research study you selected. Then, explain the parts of this study that you believe might be important for forensic psychology professionals working in correctional settings. Finally, explain how a forensic psychology professional might use the results of the study in a correctional setting. Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In the pursuit of advancing correctional mental health services, research plays a pivotal role in shaping effective assessment and treatment interventions. For this discussion, I selected a research study titled “Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Reducing Recidivism among Incarcerated Offenders,” conducted by Smith et al. (2021). This study investigated how applying cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) within a correctional setting can influence inmates' likelihood of reoffending after release. The study employed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 200 inmates diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder or conduct disorder, randomly assigned to receive either standard correctional treatment or CBT-based intervention. Data collection involved pre- and post-intervention assessments, along with follow-up evaluations at six and twelve months to assess recidivism rates. The results demonstrated that inmates who participated in CBT exhibited significantly lower reoffending rates compared to those who received standard treatment. Additionally, improvements in impulsivity, anger management, and social problem-solving skills were notable among the CBT group.

This study's methods, including the randomized controlled trial design and longitudinal follow-up, are essential for forensic psychology professionals working in correctional settings. The rigorous experimental approach lends credibility to the findings, ensuring that the observed effects can be attributed to the intervention. The focus on reducing recidivism aligns with correctional goals, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based practices. The assessment tools—such as validated questionnaires measuring impulsivity and aggression—offer practical ways to evaluate inmate progress and tailor treatment programs. From a clinical perspective, the study underscores the value of implementing structured, evidence-based interventions like CBT to address criminogenic needs that contribute to reoffending.

Forensic psychologists in correctional settings can apply the results of this study in various ways. First, they can advocate for the integration of CBT programs into existing correctional mental health services to improve offender rehabilitation outcomes. Given the demonstrated reduction in reoffending, psychologists can use these findings to inform policies and secure funding for such interventions. Second, they can utilize assessment tools similar to those employed in the study to evaluate inmate readiness for treatment and to measure treatment effectiveness over time. Furthermore, forensic psychologists can develop individualized treatment plans based on identified risk and protective factors, aiming to mitigate criminogenic needs identified in the research. Lastly, the longitudinal follow-up approach exemplified in the study can be adopted in correctional settings to monitor the long-term impacts of interventions, thus continually refining treatment strategies for better outcomes.

References

• Smith, J., Johnson, L., & Lee, R. (2021). Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy in reducing recidivism among incarcerated offenders. Journal of Correctional Psychology, 35(2), 123-135.
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Routledge.
• Baird, K. M., & Morash, M. (2018). Evidence-based practices in correctional mental health. Corrections Management Quarterly, 22(3), 45-56.
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2017). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
• Pratt, D., & Maruna, S. (2013). Rehabilitation and desistance: Toward a meta-review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(1), 28-46.
• Wilson, H. A., McMahon, R. J., & Van Dorn, R. A. (2015). Evidence-based practices in correctional mental health care. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 54(3), 139-157.
• Walmsley, R. (2018). World Prison Brief. Institute for Criminal Policy Research.
• Lewis, E., & Petry, B. (2019). Forensic assessment tools in correctional settings. Forensic Psychology Review, 30(4), 250-265.
• Anderson, V., & Burke, T. (2020). Implementing evidence-based mental health practices in correctional systems. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 26(2), 134-143.
• Reid, J., & Springer, E. (2022). Innovations in forensic assessment: Implications for correctional treatment. Forensic Science & Psychology, 10(1), 45-60.