Servant Leadership: A Valuable Theory To Enact Change

Servant Leadership Is A Valuable Theory To Enact Change Within Society

Servant leadership is a valuable theory to enact change within society. From Gandhi to Martin Luther King, Jr., servant leadership highlights that a leader’s greatness may depend upon the way in which the leader serves his or her subordinates. With servant leadership, a leader transforms into a guide or teacher for subordinates, in turn creating subordinate autonomy and ownership in work. As a leader, empowering your subordinates and cultivating a vested interest in work might be the most essential components to develop for effective, servant leadership. For this Discussion, select an event, not previously used in the course, which highlights techniques of servant leadership.

For the event, consider whether or not the leadership techniques were effective. Also, consider the possibility of applying another leadership theory to the selected event. How may the outcomes change in relation to the application of a different leadership theory? Post a brief description of the event you selected. Then, explain whether servant leadership was the most effective leadership perspective in the event you selected.

Justify your response. Finally, explain how event outcomes might have been different with another leadership perspective.

Paper For Above instruction

One illustrative event demonstrating servant leadership is the response of Mahatma Gandhi during India's struggle for independence from British rule. Gandhi’s leadership exemplified core principles of servant leadership, such as prioritizing the needs of the people, fostering empowerment, and leading by example. He consistently emphasized nonviolent resistance, truth, and service to others, which galvanized millions across India to unite and demand independence. Gandhi’s approach was fundamentally rooted in serving the collective good rather than personal power, which made his leadership highly effective in mobilizing a large, diverse population to achieve a common goal.

In this context, Gandhi’s techniques—active listening, humility, and empowering people—were effective because they built trust and fostered a sense of ownership among followers. By serving the needs of the oppressed and marginalized, Gandhi elevated their voices and collective strength, thus creating a movement rooted in moral authority and shared purpose. His leadership created a sustainable movement characterized by discipline and resilience, ultimately leading to Indian independence in 1947.

Assessing whether servant leadership was the most effective perspective in this event reveals that it indeed was. Gandhi’s emphasis on service and selflessness directly mobilized masses, inspiring deep commitment and sacrifice. His focus on empowering others, promoting nonviolence, and moral integrity resonated deeply with followers, sustaining their motivation over decades of struggle. The effectiveness of his servant leadership approach is evidenced by the peaceful yet forceful movement that culminated in independence without widespread violence or turmoil.

However, analyzing the event through other leadership perspectives, such as transformational leadership, might have provided different insights. Transformational leadership emphasizes inspiring followers to transcend their self-interest for the sake of the larger vision. If Gandhi’s leadership had aligned more explicitly with transformational principles, the outcomes might have been even more dynamic. For instance, a focus on inspiring followers with a compelling vision for a united, self-sufficient India could have accelerated mobilization and reinforced commitment through shared ideals. Conversely, other theories such as transactional leadership, which emphasizes reward and punishment, might have been less effective, potentially reducing motivation to the mere pursuit of rewards rather than moral conviction.

Applying transformational leadership could have aimed to enhance motivation by clearly articulating a compelling vision of India as an independent nation, rallying followers around shared aspirations and values. This might have expedited collective action and fostered even greater innovation in protest strategies. Nonetheless, Gandhi’s core principles aligned closely with servant leadership, especially his selfless service and focus on others’ needs, which proved central to the success of India’s independence movement.

In conclusion, Gandhi’s leadership during India’s independence struggle demonstrates the effectiveness of servant leadership, particularly in mobilizing mass support through moral example and empowerment. While alternative leadership styles like transformational leadership might have offered additional motivational tools, the core virtues of serving others and humility proved indispensable. The success of his leadership underscores the importance of contextually appropriate leadership theories, with servant leadership exemplifying a compelling approach for societal change rooted in moral service and collective empowerment.

References

• Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
• King, M. L. Jr. (1963). Letter from Birmingham Jail. The Atlantic Monthly, 212(2), 78-88.
• Gandhi, M. K. (1940). The Story of My Experiments with Truth. Navajivan Publishing House.
• Spears, L. C. (2010). Practicing servant leadership: Giving and serving in leadership development. Springer.
• Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
• Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Uhl-Biederman, M. (2000). Chaos and complexity in leadership theory: State of the field. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 561-593.