Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell As A Young Man

Shooting An Elephantgeorge Orwellas A Young Man George Orwell Was An

Examine the concepts of "I," "me," and "self" as defined by George Herbert Mead in relation to Orwell's narrative in "Shooting an Elephant." Analyze how Orwell's use of "I" and "me" reflects Mead's theory, providing specific examples from the text to illustrate each component. Discuss how Orwell's final comment suggests which component—"I" or "me"—played a more significant role in his actions that day. Define the term "definition of the situation" and identify Orwell's view of what should have been done when he first saw the elephant, citing the relevant passage. Explain how Orwell's actual decision to shoot the elephant relates to the concept of "negotiated order," and whether explicit negotiation was involved or if a negotiated order emerged informally. Describe the concepts of symbols, stereotypes, and self-fulfilling prophecies, and evaluate their presence in the essay with examples. Address racist terms used in the essay, their impact on expectations and stereotypes, and analyze why Orwell, among many, was perceived as the only one capable of shooting the elephant. Identify an example of a self-fulfilling prophecy in the text. Discuss the idea of the social construction of reality, explaining how Orwell's justifications and interpretations of his actions serve as social constructions. Consider whether Orwell's behavior would have differed if he had been alone and how perceptions of others influence individual actions and interpretations. Conclude by reflecting on how this perspective enhances understanding of the insights conveyed in Orwell's narrative.

Paper For Above instruction

George Orwell's narrative "Shooting an Elephant" offers a compelling exploration of the complex interplay between individual identity, social expectations, and the perceptions that construct reality. Central to this analysis are the concepts of "I," "me," and "self," as theorized by George Herbert Mead, which provide a framework to understand Orwell's internal conflict and societal role during the event.

Mead's theory distinguishes the "I" as the spontaneous, autonomous aspect of the self, and the "me" as the socialized component that integrates societal expectations and norms. Orwell's use of "I" in the statement, "As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him," exemplifies the spontaneous judgment and personal moral reasoning characteristic of the "I." He recognizes the seriousness of killing a working elephant and considers his own initial inclination to refrain from violence, indicating a moment of instinctive moral reflection. Conversely, the use of "me" in the phrase, "And suddenly I realized that I should have to shoot the elephant after all. The people expected it of me and I had got to do it," aligns with the internalized societal expectations and the external pressures that shape Orwell's behavior. The "me" reflects his perception of others' opinions and the social role he is compelled to perform, which ultimately overrides his personal moral impulse.

Orwell's final comment, "I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool," suggests that the "I" and "me" components of his self were in conflict. His admission that his actions were motivated primarily by a desire to maintain his social image indicates that the "me"—the social self—exerted a dominant influence in this context. The concern for reputation and avoiding humiliation were driving forces that led him to shoot the elephant, highlighting the significance of social expectations over personal morals in this scenario.

The "definition of the situation" is a sociological concept referring to the individual's perception of a particular scenario, which influences their behavior. Orwell's initial view, as expressed, is that the elephant should not be shot because doing so would be destructive and unnecessary: "It is a serious matter to shoot a working elephant—it is comparable to destroying a huge and costly piece of machinery—and obviously one ought not to do it if it can possibly be avoided." However, faced with the crowd's expectation and his perception of losing face, he deviates from this view and chooses to shoot the elephant. This shift illustrates how the definition of the situation was manipulated by social pressures and perceptions.

The concept of "negotiated order" describes the informal, ongoing process through which social roles and expectations are established and maintained without explicit agreement. In Orwell's case, the "negotiated order" is evident in the unspoken understanding between him and the crowd, as well as societal expectations that a colonial officer must demonstrate authority and decisiveness. The essay's phrase, "The crowd would laugh at me. And my whole life, every white man’s life in the East, was one long struggle not to be laughed at," encapsulates this negotiated order. Orwell's decision to shoot the elephant is not explicitly negotiated but arises from the internalization of societal norms and the desire to uphold appearances, demonstrating how negotiated social roles can operate implicitly.

Regarding symbols, stereotypes, and self-fulfilling prophecies, these are key elements in understanding social interactions and perceptions. Symbols are items or gestures that carry shared meanings; stereotypes are generalized beliefs about groups; and self-fulfilling prophecies occur when expectations influence behaviors, leading to the expected outcome. The essay contains problematic stereotypes, notably the depiction of the Burmese as irrational or savage, which aligns with colonial stereotypes prevalent at the time. The language used—referring to Burmese villagers as "yellow faces"—reflects racist stereotypes that likely influenced perceptions and expectations, reinforcing colonial dominance.

These stereotypes fostered negative expectations regarding the behavior of the Burmese, but paradoxically also contributed to Orwell's perception of his responsibilities and limitations as a colonial officer. The fact that Orwell was deemed the only person capable of shooting the elephant might reflect stereotypes about racial and colonial hierarchies—believing that only a white man, specifically Orwell, had the authority or capacity—possibly an instance of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Orwell’s belief that he was uniquely qualified logically stems from societal stereotypes about racial superiority, which in turn shapes the expectations placed upon him.

An example of a self-fulfilling prophecy appears in the expectation that Orwell must act decisively and assert his authority. His internalization of this role leads him to shoot the elephant, fulfilling societal stereotypes about colonial authority and masculinity. Orwell’s actions are thus not only driven by external pressure but also reinforced by his own internalized expectations, demonstrating how stereotypes can influence behavior in ways that reinforce the original stereotypes.

The social construction of reality refers to the process by which individuals and groups collaboratively shape perceptions, meanings, and understandings of the world, often through language and social interactions. Orwell's justifications for his actions—"I did it solely to avoid looking a fool"—are attempts to portray his behavior as rational and justified, thus constructing a reality that emphasizes social expectations over moral considerations. This act of justification highlights how perceptions of reality are socially mediated and can be manipulated to sustain particular social narratives.

If Orwell had been alone, his behavior might have differed, perhaps avoiding the act altogether due to a lack of social pressure. However, even in solitude, he might have been influenced by imagined perceptions of others—internalized social expectations—leading him to conform to the internalized role. These influences suggest that individual actions are often less autonomous than they appear, shaped by the internalization of social norms, stereotypes, and anticipated judgments.

Overall, viewing Orwell’s narrative through the lens of symbolic interactionism emphasizes how identity, social expectations, and constructed realities converge to influence behavior. It illustrates how social roles and perceptions serve to regulate individual actions within a complex web of societal influences, reinforcing the importance of understanding these concepts to grasp the deeper societal implications embedded in Orwell’s story.

References

• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Orwell, G. (1950). Shooting an Elephant and Other Essays. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Gecas, V. (1982). The Self-Concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1-33.
• Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The Discursive Mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books.
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
• Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the Self. Basic Books.
• Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.