Significant Issue In The Hearne ISD Gifted And Talented

Significant Issue In The Hearne ISD Gifted And Talente

A significant issue in the Hearne ISD gifted and talented program is the lack of gifted-specific instructional strategies utilized in the classroom. This issue stems from the lack of gifted certified teachers in the district. Out of the 71 teachers employed from K-12, only 14, 19%, have completed the gifted and talented training course (A. Puryear, personal communication, December 26, 2022). This lack of enrichment can lead gifted students to become bored in the classroom. It is imperative to the gifted and talented program that more teachers become trained in gifted instruction and accommodate higher-achieving students.

The first strategy I would use to target this issue is forming a professional learning community focused on gifted education. According to Fullan (2016), teachers need purposeful interaction like skill training workshops and time to converse with one another to give and receive help in learning new instructional strategies. Another strategy that I would implement is applying the right pressure for change. Making training and the implementation of strategies a job-embedded requirement emphasizes that gifted education is as important as general education. This pressure can be applied through data, which shows an increase in the number of students classified as gifted.

However, as Fullan (2016) notes, pressure should be accompanied by time for teachers to process and react to the change and collaborate with others to find success. By creating a district-based gifted and talented training program, teachers can learn from each other about effective methods to reach gifted students and improve instruction district-wide.

Paper For Above instruction

The issue of underpreparedness in gifted education within Hearne Independent School District (ISD) exemplifies a broader challenge facing many rural and underfunded districts nationwide. Despite the importance of adequately supporting gifted students to ensure their academic growth and emotional engagement, Hearne ISD is grappling with a shortage of teachers who are trained specifically in gifted education strategies. This lack of trained personnel results in a deficiency of appropriately challenging coursework and enrichment activities, which can cause gifted students to disengage, underperform, or develop behavioral issues due to boredom and under-stimulation.

The core of this problem lies in the district’s staffing and professional development policies. Only 19% of the teachers (14 out of 71) possess formal training in gifted and talented education, reflecting insufficient emphasis on specialized instructional strategies tailored to high-ability learners (Puryear, personal communication, December 2022). Consequently, educators may rely heavily on standard teaching methods that do not effectively engage gifted students, potentially hindering their academic progression and socio-emotional development.

Addressing this critical issue requires systemic change anchored in targeted professional development and collaborative learning among teachers. The first strategic approach involves establishing a professional learning community (PLC) dedicated to gifted education. Such communities foster an environment of continuous growth, peer-to-peer learning, and shared best practices. Fullan (2016) emphasizes that teachers benefit significantly from purposeful interactions like skill workshops and collaborative forums, which build capacity and confidence in implementing gifted strategies.

Furthermore, applying appropriate pressure for change is essential. Making gifted education training mandatory and embedded within teachers' professional responsibilities underscores its importance. Policies that tie ongoing professional development to district goals, coupled with data demonstrating the benefits of enriched instruction—such as increased numbers of students identified as gifted—can motivate staff participation and commitment. Data-driven decision-making is essential to sustain accountability and track progress effectively.

It is equally important to recognize that change should not be solely driven by mandates; teachers require time and support to process new strategies and adapt them to local contexts. Fullan (2016) advocates for providing structured time within the school schedule to facilitate collaboration, reflection, and troubleshooting. This approach helps mitigate resistance and fosters a culture of innovation, where teachers view professional growth as an ongoing journey rather than a one-time mandate.

Implementing a district-wide gifted and talented training program can serve as a catalyst for this transformation. Such a program would provide structured training sessions, mentorship opportunities, and ongoing coaching, fostering a sustainable cycle of professional improvement. As more teachers become proficient in gifted instructional strategies, the district can expect an enriched learning environment where high-ability students are challenged and engaged, ultimately improving their academic outcomes and socio-emotional well-being.

In conclusion, tackling the lack of gifted-specific instructional strategies in Hearne ISD requires concerted efforts focused on professional development, collaborative learning communities, and data-informed policy changes. These strategies align with Fullan’s (2016) principles of meaningful educational change, emphasizing capacity building, pressure for positive outcomes, and providing adequate time for teachers to adapt and refine their practices. As districts commit to these strategies, they can create a more equitable and enriching educational landscape for gifted learners, fostering their potential and ensuring their needs are met effectively.

References

• Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Gagné, F. (2014). Transforming gifted education: From controversy to consensus. Routledge.
• Kerr, B. (Ed.). (2011). The gifted and talented reader. PRUFROCK PRESS.
• National Association for Gifted Children. (2019). State of the gifted report. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org
• Renzulli, J. S. (2016). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for total school improvement. Prufrock Press.
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2017). gifted education topics: A compendium of research and practice. Routledge.
• Webb, J. T., & Amend, E. R. (2014). Enrichment and acceleration practices: A comprehensive review of literature. Roeper Review, 36(2), 105-114.
• Levy, H. M. (2018). Meeting the needs of all students: Differentiated instruction in the regular classroom. Pearson.
• Assouline, S. G., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2016). Talent Development and Gifted Education: A comprehensive review. Routledge.