Situational Reactions Read The Following Three Situations

Situational Reactionsread The Following Three Situations Describe Wha

Read the following three situations. Describe what you would do in each situation. Integrate the elements of reasoning and intellectual standards in your writing to demonstrate understanding of the material behind your personal example. Your essay should be approximately 1000 words and include the use of at least two (2) elements of reasoning and two (2) intellectual standards for each of the three (3) scenarios you will discuss.

Paper For Above instruction

Situational reactions in ethical dilemmas often challenge one’s moral reasoning, critical thinking skills, and adherence to intellectual standards such as fairness, accuracy, and consistency. The following analysis examines three distinct scenarios, applying elements of reasoning—including purpose, assumptions, implications, and point of view—and linking them to core intellectual standards, such as clarity, fairness, and relevance. This approach demonstrates how individuals can navigate complex moral situations thoughtfully and ethically.

Scenario A: Military Response to a Wrongful Shooting

In the first scenario, being deployed in a foreign country after a raid gone wrong, the squad faces pressure from their commander to falsify their account by claiming they were fired upon first, despite having mistakenly shot at innocent civilians. My response, in this case, would be grounded in integrity and adherence to ethical standards that emphasize truthfulness and justice. I would prioritize transparency and moral courage, acknowledging that fabricating evidence or misrepresenting the incident compromises the integrity of the military process and can have adverse repercussions locally and internationally.

Applying elements of reasoning, I would consider the purpose of the operation—to protect civilians and uphold human rights—and recognize that misleading authorities contradicts the moral responsibility to uphold truth (purpose and point of view). The assumption here is that dishonesty might serve short-term objectives but ultimately undermines trust, accountability, and the military's moral authority. The implication of cooperating with the false narrative could lead to further injustice, loss of credibility, and potential harm to innocent parties. I would argue that fairness and honesty are paramount, and it is essential to report the true sequence of events, even if it exposes operational mistakes; doing so aligns with the intellectual standards of fairness and honesty.

This scenario underscores the importance of moral reasoning, where fairness ensures all involved parties are treated justly, and truthfulness maintains credibility. By resisting the command to lie, I uphold the principles of integrity, accountability, and respect for human rights, which are vital in military ethics.

Scenario B: Confiscation of Marijuana and Partner’s Request

In the second scenario, as a police officer, after pulling someone over and confiscating marijuana, I face a situation where the computer system is down, preventing proper documentation. My partner then requests leniency, citing his wife’s illness and his desire to use the confiscated marijuana for medicinal purposes. Responding ethically involves balancing professional obligations with personal compassion. I would explain to my partner that, regardless of the circumstances, the confiscation is part of doing my duty and adhering to law enforcement policies, which prohibit the use and possession of illegal substances.

In terms of elements of reasoning, I would consider the purpose of law enforcement to uphold justice and public safety. The assumption is that personal needs or emotional appeals should not override critical legal standards. Recognizing this, I must also acknowledge my responsibility to ensure that records are accurate and procedures are properly followed. The implication of acting outside legal bounds could undermine the integrity of law enforcement and set a dangerous precedent if personal relationships influence professional decisions. The intellectual standard of fairness guides me to treat this situation consistently with my duties; hence, I would professionally deny my partner’s request, explaining that the law applies equally to everyone regardless of personal circumstances.

While the situation evokes empathy, maintaining professionalism and integrity is essential to uphold the rule of law. I might suggest alternative ways to help his wife, such as seeking legal medicinal programs or assistance through medical channels, honoring both ethical standards and the compassion behind his request.

Scenario C: Parental Support in Academic Challenges

The third scenario involves the ethical dilemma of whether to assist a child with a challenging assignment that could jeopardize a scholarship. Given my knowledge as a graduate student, I understand that the assignment is unreasonable for a high schooler and that actively helping might produce a poor-quality submission that doesn’t reflect the child's true abilities. However, the high-stakes nature of the situation complicates my decision-making process.

In this scenario, I would use elements of reasoning such as purpose and assumptions. The purpose of the educational process is to foster learning and skill development; assuming that in this case, the assignment is unnecessarily difficult, conflicts with the standard expectations for a student's age and academic level. The implication of actively helping is that the child's performance may be artificially inflated, potentially undermining their integrity and learning process. Conversely, not helping could result in the loss of a significant scholarship, impacting the child's future.

Applying intellectual standards, fairness and relevance are critical here. It’s fair to consider the student’s best interest and the integrity of the evaluation process. While helping may seem compassionate, it risks compromising the fairness of academic assessments. The right approach would be to support the child in understanding the assignment, breaking it into manageable parts, and encouraging genuine effort rather than directly completing it on their behalf. This promotes fairness and relevance—ensuring the child's work accurately reflects their capabilities and provides a learning opportunity, rather than an unearned advantage.

Balancing ethical considerations, I would aim to empower my child to approach the assignment in a way that respects academic standards and personal growth, which aligns with fostering honesty, fairness, and educational integrity.

Conclusion

These three scenarios illustrate the significance of applying ethical reasoning and intellectual standards to navigate complex moral dilemmas. Whether in military conduct, law enforcement, or education, maintaining integrity, fairness, and honesty ensures that actions uphold moral and professional standards. Critical reflection activated through elements of reasoning—such as purpose, assumptions, and implications—supports ethical decision-making that respects human rights, legal standards, and personal integrity. Cultivating these skills fosters trustworthiness and moral resilience in challenging situations, ultimately contributing to a more just and ethical society.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The Measurement of Moral Judgement. Cambridge University Press.
• Crane, T., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on Moral Development, Volume One: The Philosophy of Moral Development. Harper & Row.
• Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices. HarperOne.
• Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1994). Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. Psychology Press.
• Tsoukas, H., & Shepherd, I. (2004). Managing the ethical dilemmas of policing: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics.
• Whetstone, C. (2012). Leadership and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(4), 408–415.
• Wilkinson, T. (2011). Moral reasoning, ethical decision making, and professional integrity. Journal of Polytechnic Education and Practice, 1(2), 45–55.
• Young, D. (2020). Moral reasoning and decision making in professional contexts. Ethics & Behavior, 30(1), 19–29.