Social Media And Networking Presentation Scenario

SOCIAL MEDIA AND NETWORKING PRESENTATIONSCENARIOIMAGINE THAT YOU HAVE

Analyze how a university might integrate at least two social media and networking technologies to encourage student collaboration and improve community sense. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of social networking. Explain the system development life cycle and how you plan to implement social networking tools within this cycle. Present your proposal in a 10- to 15-slide PowerPoint™ presentation, including slide templates, layouts, themes, at least one animation, and media objects. The presentation should include speaker notes explaining each slide in detail, and it should incorporate an example of acquiring the appropriate information systems and applications for these new initiatives.

Paper For Above instruction

The integration of social media and networking technologies within university settings offers promising avenues to foster student collaboration and enhance communal bonds. An effective approach involves selecting platforms that not only facilitate communication but also support knowledge sharing and community building. Two notable social media technologies suitable for this purpose are Facebook Groups and Twitter. Both platforms have widespread adoption among students, offering user-friendly interfaces and varied features that encourage interaction and content sharing.

Facebook Groups serve as virtual communities where students can join based on courses, interests, or extracurricular activities. These groups provide avenues for discussions, event planning, resource sharing, and peer support. Their advantages include high familiarity among students, real-time interaction, and multimedia sharing capabilities. However, disadvantages comprise privacy concerns, information overload, and potential distractions that can detract from academic focus.

Twitter complements Facebook by enabling quick, concise communication, real-time updates, and hashtag-driven discussions on academic or community topics. Its advantages include rapid dissemination of information, engagement in trending issues, and fostering a sense of immediacy and connection. The disadvantages involve character limitations that restrict depth, potential for miscommunication, and the spread of misinformation if not properly moderated.

Implementing these platforms requires understanding the university’s needs and selecting appropriate participants, content moderation policies, and privacy controls. The System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) provides a structured framework to guide this process, encompassing phases such as planning, analysis, design, development, testing, implementation, and maintenance.

During the planning phase, requirements gathering involves identifying user needs, platform capabilities, and integration points with existing systems. Analysis entails evaluating technical and logistical feasibility. The design phase involves creating detailed specifications, choosing suitable hardware/software infrastructure, and defining user interfaces. Development covers configuring or creating the social media tools, followed by testing to identify and rectify issues. Deployment involves training users, launching the platforms, and actively managing content and interactions.

Incorporating social networking tools into the SDLC ensures systematic deployment, reduces risks, and promotes sustainability. The process includes selecting the right information systems—such as cloud-based collaboration platforms or custom-built solutions—and applications that align with institutional goals. Security features, scalability, and user-friendliness are critical factors during acquisition and integration.

This strategic approach not only enhances student engagement but also ensures that technological implementations are aligned with institutional policies and pedagogical objectives. A comprehensive training program coupled with continuous evaluation and feedback mechanisms will help optimize the use of social media and networking tools, fostering a vibrant, connected university community.

References

• Bersoff, D. (2003). Ethical conflicts in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Corey, G., Corey, M., & Callanan, P. (2011). Issues and ethics in the helping professions. Belmont, Calif: Brooks/Cole.
• Day, D. (2014). The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Dewey, J., Hickman, L., & Alexander, T. (1998). The essential Dewey. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Forsyth, D. (2010). Group dynamics. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
• Heppner, P. P., Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., & Wampold, B. E. (1999). Research design in counseling (2nd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
• Knapp, S., & VandeCreek, L. (2006). Practical ethics for psychologists: a positive approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Nagy, T. (2011). Essential ethics for psychologists: a primer for understanding and mastering core issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Pope, K., & Vasquez, M. (2010). Ethics in Psychotherapy and Counseling: a Practical Guide. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2003). Addiction. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 25–53.