Social Work Research Planning: A Program Evaluation 106583

Resource 1social Work Research Planning A Program Evaluationjoan Is A

Joan is a social worker and PhD student planning a dissertation research project with a large nonprofit child welfare organization. She has secured initial interest and collaboration from the agency's leadership, which operates seven regional centers focusing primarily on foster care services. Each regional center serves approximately 45–50 foster families and 100 foster children, with consistent recruitment of 5–6 new foster families quarterly over the past two years. The organization is implementing a new foster parent training program aimed at reducing placement disruptions, enhancing service quality, and improving child well-being.

The new training program consists of six detailed, manualized sessions, each lasting three hours and conducted biweekly. It will replace an existing program with a different focus, which will continue in centers not yet adopting the new program. The new program will be implemented at three centers immediately, while four others will delay implementation for 12 months. All training sessions will be conducted by the same two instructors, ensuring consistency. Joan's review of the literature revealed that no current research exists on this training program, although standardized measurement instruments are available for her study. She plans to use a group research design, utilizing data collected from all seven centers at different time points, to evaluate the program's effectiveness in meeting its goals.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Program evaluation is a critical component in social work research, allowing practitioners and researchers to systematically assess the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of interventions and programs. Joan’s proposed study on the new foster parent training program exemplifies the application of rigorous evaluation methods to ensure that the program achieves its intended goals of reducing placement disruptions, improving service quality, and enhancing child well-being. Given the organizational context of a large, multi-site child welfare agency, selecting appropriate evaluation strategies that align with both the organizational structure and resource constraints is essential. This paper discusses the planning process for Joan’s program evaluation, emphasizing relevant research design considerations, outcome measurement tools, and methodological approaches suitable for resource-limited settings.

Understanding the Context of the Program

Effective program evaluation begins with a comprehensive understanding of the organizational context and the specific interventions under investigation. Joan’s focus on a new, manualized foster parent training program within a large, multi-center child welfare organization presents unique opportunities and challenges. The decentralized nature of the agency, with seven regional centers operating semi-independently, necessitates a design that can capture variance across sites while maintaining comparability. The evaluation aims to determine whether the training program improves foster parent competencies, reduces disruptions, and enhances child well-being, aligning with the agency’s strategic goals.

Designing the Evaluation Framework

A suitable evaluation approach for Joan’s study is outcomes-based, emphasizing the measurement of changes in specific indicators pre- and post-intervention. The group design, involving all seven centers at different stages of implementation, can accommodate a quasi-experimental framework. Centers initiating the training immediately serve as the intervention group, while those delaying implementation operate as controls during the first 12 months. This staggered rollout allows for comparisons over time, controlling for external factors and secular trends. Incorporating repeated measures across multiple sites enhances internal validity and the robustness of findings.

Measurement Strategies and Instruments

Measurement tools are central to any evaluation. Joan identified existing standardized instruments appropriate for assessing foster parent skills, child well-being, and placement stability. These instruments will provide reliable, validated quantitative data. Additionally, she plans to develop Likert-type scales tailored to capture perceptions of training effectiveness, satisfaction, and perceived proficiency among foster parents. The use of both standardized and custom scales facilitates rich data collection while addressing specific evaluation questions.

Data Collection Methods

Data collection in resource-limited settings often requires pragmatic and cost-effective methods. Joan can utilize surveys administered at multiple points—before the training, immediately after, and at follow-up intervals—to measure changes over time. Training staff or research assistants at each site to administer surveys ensures standardized data collection. Supplementary data sources such as case records, child and foster parent interviews, and administrative data on placement disruptions can augment survey findings. Combining qualitative insights with quantitative data enhances the evaluative depth and contextual understanding.

Addressing Challenges in Evaluation

Several challenges are inherent in Joan’s evaluation design, including the variability across sites, potential attrition, and limited resources. Ensuring consistency in training delivery by the same instructors supports internal validity. Addressing attrition may involve engaging foster parents throughout the study and maintaining regular communication. Resource constraints can be alleviated through cost-effective data collection tools such as online surveys, utilizing existing agency staff for data gathering, and prioritizing key outcome indicators. Ensuring ethical considerations, including informed consent and confidentiality, is paramount in all evaluation activities.

Data Analysis and Interpretation

Statistical analyses, such as repeated-measures ANOVA or mixed-effects models, can evaluate changes within and between sites over time, accounting for the clustered nature of the data. These analyses will identify whether significant improvements occur in foster parent skills, child well-being, and placement stability attributable to the training. Effect sizes and confidence intervals will add interpretability to the findings. Qualitative data from interviews can be analyzed thematically to contextualize quantitative outcomes and provide nuanced insights into the training’s impact.

Utilizing Findings for Program Improvement

The ultimate goal of Joan’s evaluation is to generate actionable insights that inform program refinement, replication, and policy decisions. Positive findings can support scaling the training program across all regional centers, while identification of areas needing adjustment can guide targeted improvements. Disseminating results through reports and stakeholder meetings ensures that evaluation findings translate into organizational learning and enhanced practice.

Conclusion

Planning and conducting a comprehensive program evaluation in a resource-limited environment requires strategic design choices, valid measurement tools, and pragmatic data collection methods. Joan’s approach, leveraging a staggered implementation and standardized instruments, aligns well with evaluation best practices. By systematically assessing the program’s outcomes, her study will contribute valuable knowledge to foster care training practices and demonstrate the importance of rigorous evaluation in social work innovation.

References

• Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Pearson Higher Ed.
• Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin.
• Levin, H. M., & McEwan, P. J. (2001). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods and Applications. Sage Publications.
• Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus. Sage Publications.
• Mann, D. R., & Hatcher, R. L. (2012). Basic Skills in Program Evaluation. Sage Publications.
• Chambers, D. A., Durlak, J. A., & DuBois, D. L. (2013). Analyzing and Interpreting Program Evaluation Data. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013(137), 69-81.
• Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for Studying Programs and Policies. Prentice Hall.
• Summers, J., & Thakur, A. (2020). Outcomes-Based Evaluation in Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 30(4), 545-561.