Sociology 1A06 2014–2015 Professor Sandra Colavecchia Gradin

Sociology 1a06 2014 2015 Professor Sandra Colavecchia Grading Rubri

Sociology 1a06 2014 2015 Professor Sandra Colavecchia Grading Rubri

Sociology 1A06, , Professor Sandra Colavecchia Grading Rubric: Assignment #1 (Total Points: 100) Potential Deductions: 1) 20 points deducted for not submitting assignment to turnitin.com by deadline. 2) 20 points deducted for not receiving at least 80% (ie. 37 out of 46) on the Academic Integrity & Library Quiz. 3) 5 points deducted per day for late submissions. 4) Plagiarized assignments will be given a grade of 0.

Note: Please refer to course syllabus and lecture notes for more details on assignment requirements.

Objective/Criteria

Part A: Selection of Sources (20 points)

  • Requirement 1: All 5 articles must be closely related reflecting a narrow focus – 10 points
  • Requirement 2: All 5 articles must be sociological – 10 points
  • Requirement 3: All 5 articles must be peer-reviewed – 5 points deducted for each non-peer-reviewed article
  • Requirement 4: 2 out of the 5 articles must have been published after Jan. 1 – points deducted if 1 article is not recent; 10 points deducted if 2 articles are not recent
  • Requirement 5: Length of articles must be acceptable (average article is 15-30 pages; no articles less than 10 pages) – 5 points deducted for each article of insufficient length

Part B: Answering Questions about each Article (50 points)

  • Article 1: key research questions of study (2-3 sentences) – 5 points
  • Article 1: key findings of study (4-6 sentences) – 5 points
  • Article 2: key research questions of study – 5 points
  • Article 2: key findings of study – 5 points
  • Article 3: key research questions of study – 5 points
  • Article 3: key findings of study – 5 points
  • Article 4: key research questions of study – 5 points
  • Article 4: key findings of study – 5 points
  • Article 5: key research questions of study – 5 points
  • Article 5: key findings of study – 5 points

Part C: Comparing & Drawing Connections (30 points)

Comparisons & Connections of Research Questions in Articles. 6-10 sentences. A mark of Excellent entails: · Thoughtful comparative analysis. · Use of in-text citations to demonstrate connections being drawn. · Effective writing and careful editing (i.e., sentence construction, clarity, grammar, etc) – 15 (Excellent), 12 (Good), 9 (Adequate), 6 (Inadequate), 0 (Absent)

Comparisons & Connections of Research Findings in Articles. 6-10 sentences. See above for requirements – same scoring rubric applies.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires a comprehensive examination of five sociological articles that are closely related and peer-reviewed. The primary aim is to analyze and synthesize research questions and findings across these articles, emphasizing their interconnectedness and cumulative insights into sociological phenomena.

To begin, selecting appropriate sources is crucial. The articles must reflect a narrow focus within sociology, ensuring relevance and depth. All five articles should be peer-reviewed to maintain scholarly rigor, and at least two should be recent publications post-January 1. The length of each article should be substantial, generally ranging from 15 to 30 pages, to provide sufficient detail for analysis. Insufficient length articles should be excluded or replaced to meet academic standards.

Following source selection, each article must be summarized by identifying its key research questions and main findings. This step involves distilling complex research into concise, 2-3 sentence queries and 4-6 sentence summaries that capture the essence of the studies’ objectives, methodologies, and conclusions. Accurate representation of each article is essential for meaningful comparison.

The next phase involves comparing and connecting the articles critically. This entails analyzing similarities and differences in research questions, assessing how their findings complement or challenge each other. Effective cross-article analysis should involve thoughtful reflection on underlying themes, theoretical frameworks, and methodological approaches, articulated through 6-10 well-crafted sentences per comparison task. Proper citation methods must be employed to ground these connections in the scholarly literature.

Finally, the paper should articulate clear insights gained from the comparative analysis, drawing broader conclusions about the sociological issues addressed. Clarity, coherence, and scholarly writing standards are vital throughout the assignment to demonstrate analytical rigor and academic integrity.

References

  • Author, A. A. (Year). Title of the peer-reviewed article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  • Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the peer-reviewed article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  • Author, C. C. (Year). Title of the peer-reviewed article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  • Author, D. D. (Year). Title of the peer-reviewed article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
  • Author, E. E. (Year). Title of the peer-reviewed article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx

Related Assignments