Socw 6070 Week 6 Responses Responding To 2 Peers' Posts Sepa ✓ Solved

Socw 6070 Wk 6 Responses Responding To 2 Peers Posts Separately

Socw 6070 Wk 6 Responses Responding To 2 Peers Posts Separately

Respond to at least two colleagues posts separately in one of the following ways: expand upon your colleague’s response to the Bradley case and case study provided, or critique your colleague’s strategy for addressing the ethical dilemma they have described.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In social work practice, confronting ethical dilemmas requires a careful balance between respecting client autonomy, maintaining confidentiality, and protecting vulnerable populations. The Bradley case exemplifies the complexities that social workers face when making decisions that influence their clients' well-being while adhering to professional and legal standards. Responding to peer insights allows us to explore different perspectives on how to ethically navigate such situations.

Nakesha Morgan emphasizes the importance of respecting client decisions and maintaining professional boundaries, especially concerning the use of client images for promotional purposes. She advocates for informing clients about how their images will be used and ensuring that confidentiality is maintained consistent with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the NASW Code of Ethics. Morgan rightly underscores that when working with vulnerable clients such as Tiffani, the social worker’s priority should be preserving her dignity and emotional well-being. Her suggestion to advocate on Tiffani’s behalf aligns with the NASW’s core values of service, dignity, and respect. Furthermore, Morgan raises a valid point regarding the ethical concern surrounding the use of a client's image in promotional materials without explicit consent, which could ultimately harm the client's trust and recovery process.

Similarly, Morgan discusses an incident involving a teacher asking a resident in a children’s group home about inappropriate sexual behaviors in front of peers. She critiques this practice and advocates for respecting the resident's privacy by speaking privately with the teacher. This response reflects a solid understanding of ethical principles related to confidentiality, non-maleficence, and client dignity. Her approach demonstrates proactive intervention to prevent potential psychological harm, highlighting the importance of maintaining a trauma-sensitive environment. Morgan’s strategy emphasizes the need for organizational awareness of ethical boundaries, especially when working with vulnerable populations such as children and residents with recent behavioral issues.

On the other hand, Randall Walsh responds to the Bradley case by focusing on the ethical tension between empowerment and protection. He emphasizes the importance of self-reflection on personal values such as trustworthiness, respect, and fairness. Walsh advocates for a transparent and honest dialogue with Tiffani, informing her of potential risks involved in public promotions. His approach aligns with the NASW’s principles of self-determination and client empowerment but also underlines the need for safeguarding clients from possible re-traumatization or harm. Walsh suggests that a social worker should carefully weigh these factors and consider the client’s readiness and emotional stability before involving her in promotional activities.

Walsh also introduces a hypothetical scenario involving a domestic violence survivor who relapses into substance use while in shelter. He advocates for a client-centered approach that includes referrals to specialized programs to address her mental health and addiction issues. This reflects a strategic application of ethical principles such as beneficence and non-maleficence, ensuring that the client’s welfare remains central. His critique highlights the importance of advocating within organizational policies while prioritizing individual client needs, reinforcing the social worker’s duty to act in the best interest of clients even when organizational constraints pose ethical challenges.

Both peers demonstrate a nuanced understanding of ethical practice in social work, emphasizing client advocacy, confidentiality, and respect for autonomy. Critical evaluation of their strategies reveals a shared commitment to uphold the NASW Code of Ethics and to view each case from a holistic perspective that considers organizational policies, client vulnerabilities, and professional responsibilities. Nevertheless, it is also vital for social workers to continually reflect on their own values and biases to ensure that their interventions are ethically sound and culturally competent.

References

  • National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
  • Northouse, P. G. (2021). Introduction to leadership: Concepts and practice (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. (2014). Sessions: Case histories. Laureate International Universities Publishing.
  • Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Reamer, F. G. (2018). Ethical standards in social work: A review of the NASW Code of Ethics. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 15(2), 4-10.
  • Zimmerman, M. A. (2017). Resilience theory and practice: Challenges and opportunities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(1-2), 14–24.
  • Geurts, S. (2019). Ethical decision-making in social work: A review. Ethics & Social Welfare, 13(1), 50-66.
  • Hepworth, D. H., Rooney, R. H., & Larsen, J. A. (2017). Direct social work practice: Theory and skills (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Kolivoski, K. M., & Linden, J. A. (2019). Navigating ethical dilemmas in child welfare practice. Child Welfare, 97(4), 1–20.
  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethical leadership and organizational integrity. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–195.

Related Assignments