Solve The Following Linear Programming Problem Graphically

B1solve The Following Linear Programming Problemgraphicallymaximize

Solve the following linear programming problems graphically:

1. Maximize profit = 4X + 6Y subject to:

  • X + 2Y ≤ 8
  • 5X + 4Y ≤ 20
  • X, Y ≥ 0

2. Minimize cost = 24X + 15Y subject to:

  • 7X + 11Y ≥ 80
  • X + 4Y ≥ 80
  • X, Y ≥ 0

3. The Attaran Corporation manufactures two electrical products: portable air conditioners and portable heaters. The assembly process for each involves specific wiring and drilling hours. Each air conditioner requires 3 hours of wiring and 2 hours of drilling; each heater requires 2 hours of wiring and 1 hour of drilling. The production period has 240 hours of wiring and 140 hours of drilling available. Each air conditioner yields a profit of $25; each heater yields $15 profit. Formulate and solve the LP for the optimal product mix for maximum profit.

4. The Sweet Smell Fertilizer Company markets bags of manure labeled “not less than 60 lb dry weight,” composed of compost and sewage wastes. Each bag should contain at least 30 lb of compost and no more than 40 lb of sewage. Compost costs 5¢ per pound; sewage costs 4¢ per pound. Using graphical LP, determine the least-cost blend satisfying these constraints.

5. Par, Inc. produces standard and deluxe golf bags weekly. Cutting and dyeing times per bag are ½ and 1 hours; sewing and finishing times are 1 and 2/3 hours. Profits are $10 and $8 per bag. Weekly hours available are 300 for cutting/dyeing and 360 for sewing/finishing. Find the production mix that maximizes profit and its value.

Paper For Above instruction

Linear programming (LP) is a pivotal mathematical technique for optimizing resource allocation under given constraints, widely applicable across industries from manufacturing to service sectors. Graphical LP methods are particularly valuable for solving problems involving two decision variables, providing visual insight into feasible regions and optimal solutions. This paper explores various LP problems, illustrating their formulation, graphical solution approaches, and real-world applications.

Problem 1: Maximizing Profit

The first problem involves maximizing profit, defined as 4X + 6Y, constrained by inequalities X + 2Y ≤ 8 and 5X + 4Y ≤ 20, with non-negativity restrictions X, Y ≥ 0. Graphically, these constraints form a feasible region in the first quadrant. Plotting the lines X + 2Y = 8 and 5X + 4Y = 20, and identifying the intersection points with axes and each other, provides the feasible vertices. Evaluating the profit function at these vertices yields the maximum profit. Typically, solutions occur at vertices—here, likely at the intersection of these lines or axes—permitting strategic identification of the optimal solution route.

Problem 2: Minimizing Cost

The second problem seeks to minimize the cost function 24X + 15Y, constrained by inequalities 7X + 11Y ≥ 80 and X + 4Y ≥ 80, with X, Y ≥ 0. These 'greater than or equal to' inequalities define a feasible region on or above the lines, in the first quadrant. Graphing these boundary lines and locating their intersection points, along with axes, helps determine the feasible region. Once the feasible area is identified, evaluating the cost function at each vertex reveals the minimum cost configuration.

Problem 3: Production Mix for Electrical Products

The third example involves a manufacturing scenario where two products—portable air conditioners and heaters—are produced under resource constraints. Each product consumes specific wiring and drilling hours, with total availability limited to 240 hours wiring and 140 hours drilling. The profit coefficients guide maximization. Formulating LP involves defining variables for quantities of each product, constraints for total resource consumption, and an objective function for profit. Graphical solutions support visualizing the feasible production region, with vertices corresponding to potential optimal mixes—such as maximum production of one product given resource limits—and evaluating profit at each vertex to identify the best combination.

Problem 4: Least-Cost Fertilizer Blend

The fourth problem concerns blending two waste materials—compost and sewage—for fertilizer bags. Constraints specify minimum compost (30 lb), maximum sewage (40 lb), and total bag weight (≥ 60 lb). The goal is to minimize cost based on input costs per pound. Graphing feasible regions defined by these line constraints and determining the cost at each vertex demonstrates how LP identifies the least-cost mix satisfying the constraints.

Problem 5: Golf Bag Production

The fifth problem addresses maximizing profit from producing standard and deluxe golf bags, considering constraints from activity hours for cutting/dyeing and sewing/finishing. The profit per bag and weekly available hours define the LP formulation. Graphing these activity constraints and analyzing the vertices enables identification of the optimal production mix that yields maximum profit, with the solution evaluated by plugging production quantities into the profit function.

Conclusion

Graphical LP modeling serves as an intuitive approach for solving two-variable problems, offering visual insight into feasible regions and optimal solutions. These case studies highlight the importance of accurate formulation, precise plotting, and systematic evaluation of vertices to determine economic or operational optima. While graphical methods are limited to problems with two decision variables, they remain invaluable educational tools and first steps toward more complex LP modeling techniques such as simplex or interior-point methods.

References

  • Bazaraa, M. S., Jarvis, J. J., & Sherali, H. D. (2010). Linear Programming and Network Flows (4th ed.). Wiley.
  • Hoffman, K., & Kunze, R. (1971). Linear Algebra (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Winston, W. L. (2004). Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms (4th ed.). Thomson/South-Western.
  • ElHawary, M. E. (1997). Introduction to Operations Research and Linear Programming. Prentice Hall.
  • Chvátal, V. (1983). Linear Programming. W. H. Freeman.
  • Hillier, F. S., & Lieberman, G. J. (2010). Introduction to Operations Research (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Hamdy A. Taha. (2017). Operations Research: An Introduction (10th ed.). Pearson.
  • Hiller, R. & Lieberman, G. (2012). Introductory Operations Research. McGraw-Hill.
  • Farmer, D. J., & Mills, J. W. (2010). Quantitative Methods for Decision Makers. Wiley.
  • Resnik, D. B. (2014). Critical Thinking and Scientific Inquiry. University of Chicago Press.