Stage 3 Criticism From Professor, Even If I Accepted Your Ap

Stage 3 Critism From Professor1even If I Accepted You Approach To An

Even if I accepted your approach to an ERP solution instead of selecting a simple process improvement, you have not complied with the requirements of this assignment. The idea is to rank the level of need of the attributes of your technical solution relative to the technical solution you have selected—not to review the features of a software product. Your paper is not acceptable in this format. I will permit you to resubmit this week in the correct format. Let me know. We can discuss if you wish. If you want to do this, you will have two Case Study assignments due next week.

The purpose of this assignment is to identify your assessment of the degree of need of your technical solution for the attributes listed, and your rationale for that decision—not what your solution offers. The center column should contain only H, M, L, or N/A (as indicated in the column head), and the Explanation column is to justify the reason for that decision relative to the health club.

Your submission continues to identify the features available in the software solution you selected. I explained this to you quite explicitly in my comments to your first submission, and again, in class this week. Also, some of your explanations misinterpret the attribute (i.e., Accessibility is about varying levels of access, not remote operation). PLEASE READ CAREFULLY AND UNDERSTAND THE ASSIGNMENT BEFORE PROCEEDING OR I WILL DISPUTE PAYMENT.

Stage 3: Using the case and the provided template (containing IT considerations such as architecture, security, etc.), identify and explain which areas in particular need to be considered more fully for the solution proposed in Stage 2.

Stage 4: Using the case provided, identify how the solution from Stage 2 could support and enhance the business, explain the business benefits of the solution, and address the considerations put forward in Stage 3. Your deliverable will be an executive briefing in Microsoft PowerPoint.

Stage 5: Using the case provided, prepare an annotated outline that identifies the next steps in implementing the solution proposed in Stage 4, addressing project management, system development life cycle, change management, etc. Your outline will be developed in Microsoft Word. USE THE WALMART AS AN EXAMPLE AND READ STAGE 1 AND 2 TO MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND THE ASSIGNMENT.

Paper For Above instruction

In response to the instructions, this paper focuses on critically assessing the necessity of various IT attributes for a proposed technical solution in the context of a health club management system, aligning with the requirements to evaluate the need levels rather than merely describing features. The primary goal is to prioritize attributes such as architecture, security, accessibility, and integration based on their importance to the health club’s operations, and rationalize these priorities with respect to the specific organizational context.

Firstly, system architecture is fundamental when evaluating the technical solution for a health club. A robust, scalable, and flexible architecture ensures the system can accommodate future growth and evolving business needs. Given the increasing digitalization and user demand for seamless operation, the need for a high (H) priority on architectural considerations is evident. For instance, cloud-based architecture can afford scalability and remote access features essential for staff and member convenience. Therefore, architecture merits a high necessity due to its influence on system performance, scalability, and adaptability.

Security concerns form another critical attribute, particularly given the sensitive nature of health data and personal information handled by health clubs. Data breaches could not only lead to legal ramifications but also damage the company's reputation. Thus, security holds a high (H) need level, demanding advanced encryption, access controls, and compliance with regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA. Securing data in transit and at rest, along with audit trails, further underscores the importance of a secure system framework.

Accessibility is often misunderstood; it does not merely pertain to remote operation but encompasses varying levels of user access based on roles. For example, employees need different privileges than members, and administrators require comprehensive control over the system. As such, accessibility features should be assigned a medium (M) need level, reflecting the importance of role-based access management in ensuring smooth, secure operation. Proper access control prevents unauthorized data manipulation and enhances user trust, which is vital in customer service environments like health clubs.

Integration capabilities with existing systems (such as financial, scheduling, or membership databases) are also vital yet may vary in priority. Due to the necessity of seamless operations and data consistency, integration merits a high (H) need level, especially when transferring data across multiple platforms. Effective integration reduces redundancies and operational errors, contributing to overall organizational efficiency.

On the other hand, attributes such as remote operation are less critical if the system's primary functions are to support internal management and member services onsite. While beneficial, requiring real-time remote operation does not hold the same urgency; thus, it is classified as a low (L) need attribute. Nonetheless, considering future expansion or the potential for remote monitoring, some level of remote operational capability can be beneficial but does not warrant immediate high priority.

In conclusion, the prioritized assessment demonstrates that architecture, security, and integration possess a high need level due to their direct impact on system performance, data protection, and operational continuity. Accessibility holds a medium need level, balancing security and user experience through role-based access. Attributes like remote operation are considered low in immediate importance but may be revisited as the system evolves. This strategic prioritization aligns with the health club's operational needs, ensuring the selected technical solution effectively supports business objectives while maintaining security and scalability.

References

• Hall, M., & Smith, J. (2020). Principles of Information Security Management. Journal of Business Systems, 12(3), 45-60.
• Kraemer, K. L., & King, J. L. (2019). Strategic Information Management. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Laudon, K. C., & Traver, C. G. (2018). E-Commerce 2018: Business, Technology, Society. Pearson.
• O'Brien, J., & Marakas, G. (2018). Management of Information Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Rainer, R. K., & Prince, B. (2018). Introduction to Information Systems. Wiley.
• Stair, R., & Reynolds, G. (2020). Principles of Information Systems. Cengage Learning.
• Turban, E., Volonino, L., & Wood, G. (2018). Information Technology for Management. Wiley.
• Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2018). Principles of Information Security. Cengage Learning.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Olsen, P., & Stieglitz, N. (2019). Building Secure Systems in the Cloud. IEEE Software, 36(4), 34-41.