Starbucks Financial Information In 2016 And 2017

Starbucks Financial Information In 2016 And 2017

Starbucks Financial Information In 2016 And 2017

Analyzing the financial performance of Starbucks over the years 2016 and 2017 reveals important insights into its operational efficiency, profitability, leverage, and overall financial health. The provided data highlights key financial ratios and compares these metrics to a leading competitor, McDonald's, for the same period. This comparison offers a comprehensive view of Starbucks’ positional strengths and weaknesses relative to its industry peer.

Paper For Above instruction

Starbucks Corporation, renowned for its global coffeehouse chain, experienced notable financial fluctuations between 2016 and 2017. The analysis of financial ratios provides vital information on how the company's financial strategies evolved and where its core strengths and vulnerabilities lay during this period. Critical ratios such as the debt ratio, gross profit margin, times interest earned, accounts receivable turnover, and inventory turnover serve as foundational indicators of the company's financial health, operational efficiency, and risk management practices.

Firstly, examining the debt ratio—a measure of leverage—indicates a slight increase from 58.88% in 2016 to 62.06% in 2017. This upward trend signifies that Starbucks took on more debt relative to its assets, which could reflect strategic borrowing for expansion or operational needs. While increased leverage can boost returns on equity when managed prudently, it also heightens financial risk, especially if earnings are volatile. Compared to McDonald's, which maintained a debt ratio below 1% and showed minimal increases, Starbucks’ leverage was substantially higher, implying a different approach to capital structure and risk management.

The gross profit margin remained consistent at 60% in both years for Starbucks, signifying stable cost control and pricing strategies over this period. In contrast, McDonald's demonstrated a notable increase from 41.44% to 46.54%, possibly indicating improved cost efficiency or pricing power. The stable gross margin at Starbucks suggests effective management of direct costs such as raw materials and labor, which supported consistent profitability margins despite the changes in leverage.

Another significant indicator is the times interest earned (TIE), which measures how comfortably a company can meet its interest obligations from earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT). Starbucks exhibited a remarkably high TIE of 52.67, implying that it earned over fifty times its interest expense, providing a comfortable safety margin. McDonald's data was not available for TIE, but assessing this ratio for Starbucks underscores its strong financial stability and capacity to service debt without strain.

Accounts receivable turnover ratios point to the efficiency of the company in collecting receivables. Starbucks experienced a slight decline from 27.70% to 25.70%, hinting at minor decreases in collection efficiency or changes in credit policies, whereas McDonald's saw a decline from 16.70% in 2016 to 11.54% in 2017. Variations in receivables turnover indicate shifts in sales collection practices or customer payment behaviors, influencing cash flow management.

Inventory turnover ratios reveal how efficiently Starbucks and McDonald's manage inventory. Starbucks, with a turnover of 6.17%, increased marginally to 6.60%, reflecting ongoing efforts to optimize inventory levels and reduce holding costs. Conversely, McDonald's experienced a dramatic reduction from 244 to approximately 17, likely due to inconsistencies or variations in inventory reporting. For Starbucks, steady inventory management is critical for controlling costs and ensuring product availability.

Additionally, profitability ratios such as return on sales and return on assets offer insights into operational efficiency. Starbucks maintained a slight increase in return on sales from 19.69% to 20.07%, indicating marginal improvements in profit margin efficiency. The return on assets also remained stable, suggesting consistent utilization of assets to generate earnings. Comparatively, McDonald's reported a significant decline in return on sales from 37.56% to 27.88%, potentially pointing to increased expenses or competitive pressures affecting profitability.

The financial leverage for Starbucks shifted positively from a negative 2.43 to 2.43, indicating that the company increased its use of debt over this period, aligning with the rise in debt ratio. This leverage helps amplify returns but also increases exposure to financial risk, especially if earnings fluctuate. The return on equity, which is highly sensitive to leverage, deteriorated in absolute terms for Starbucks, from -158.88% to approximately -212.61%, highlighting the effect of higher debt levels and potential issues in generating shareholder returns during this period.

In conclusion, Starbucks displayed stability in core profitability metrics with consistent gross margins and manageable turnover ratios. Its increased leverage indicates a strategic choice to finance growth through debt, which, given the high times interest earned ratio, does not currently threaten its financial stability. The comparison to McDonald's reveals that while Starbucks' approach involves higher leverage and debt levels, it maintains strong operational efficiency and profitability margins. Overall, these financial indicators suggest that Starbucks was in a relatively healthy position in 2016 and 2017, but continued focus on managing leverage and operational efficiency is essential to sustain long-term growth and competitiveness.

References

  • Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Gallo, A. (2014). A Refresher on Financial Ratios and How to Use Them. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/12/a-refresher-on-financial-ratios-and-how-to-use-them
  • McDonald's Corporation. (2016). Annual Report 2016. Retrieved from https://www.mcdonalds.com
  • McDonald's Corporation. (2017). Annual Report 2017. Retrieved from https://www.mcdonalds.com
  • Starbucks Corporation. (2016). Annual Report 2016. Retrieved from https://www.starbucks.com
  • Starbucks Corporation. (2017). Annual Report 2017. Retrieved from https://www.starbucks.com
  • Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Ross, S., Westerfield, R., & Jordan, B. (2013). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Wei, C., & Fan, R. (2018). Comparative Financial Analysis of Global Fast Food Giants: Case Study of McDonald's and Starbucks. Journal of Business & Finance Research, 12(3), 122-134.
  • Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management. McGraw-Hill Education.

Related Assignments