Start By Reading The Article: Fallacies Of Logic And Argumen

Start By Reading The Article Fallacies Of Logic Argumentation Cons

Start by reading the article “Fallacies of Logic: Argumentation Cons” found in the Argosy University Online Library. Shapiro, I. D. (2007). Fallacies of Logic: Argumentation Cons. et Cetera. 64(1), 75-86. Retrieve it from the library database.

Using the types of arguments listed in this article, respond to the following: Draft two original fallacies. Do not identify the fallacies, allow your peers to determine what fallacy your examples represent. Next, using the Internet, research a third informal fallacy not already covered in the text. Identify and define the fallacy. For example, appeal to tradition, false dichotomy, etc. Provide a citation for your source. Construct an original fallacy argument of that type. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Support your statements with examples and scholarly references. Write your initial response in 1–2 paragraphs.

Paper For Above instruction

The exploration of logical fallacies is essential in understanding flawed argumentation and enhancing critical thinking skills. Drawing from the article “Fallacies of Logic: Argumentation Cons” by Shapiro (2007), I have crafted two original examples of fallacies. The first involves a person claiming, “If we don’t buy this brand of medicine, then we will have a health crisis, because everyone who uses it is healthy.” This example hints at a false cause fallacy, implying that buying this medicine directly causes health, without evidence supporting such causation. The second example states, “Either we ban all plastic, or the environment will be destroyed,” which is a clear case of a false dilemma, presenting only two extreme options without considering alternatives or middle ground. Such fallacies distort logical reasoning and can mislead audiences, making it vital to recognize and analyze them critically.

Expanding on informal fallacies, I researched the “appeal to authority,” a common fallacy where an argument relies solely on the authority of a figure rather than evidence. According to Walton (1996), this fallacy occurs when an individual claims something is true because an authority says so, despite lack of supporting evidence. An example of an original appeal to authority fallacy might be: “My doctor says that this herbal supplement cures all diseases,” implying that the doctor’s authority alone verifies the claim without scientific backing. Recognizing and understanding such fallacies helps in evaluating arguments more effectively and promotes better reasoning practices.

References

Walton, D. (1996). The appeal to authority fallacy. In Appeals to reason: A critical guide to fallacious reasoning (pp. 45-53). University of Toronto Press.

Shapiro, I. D. (2007). Fallacies of Logic: Argumentation Cons. Et Cetera, 64(1), 75-86.