Start Saving Money Today On My Budget | October 26, 2017

Start Saving Money Todaymy Budget5oct 26 2017not All Infinite Number

Start Saving Money Todaymy Budget5oct 26 2017not All Infinite Number

The concept of infinite numbers has developed over centuries, evolving from philosophical notions to rigorous mathematical frameworks. Historically, ancient cultures viewed infinity as a philosophical idea, but it was not formalized mathematically until the 17th century. Aristotle recognized that while the universe could be subdivided infinitely, the concept of actual infinity was unthinkable (Wildberger, 2006). The Greek mathematicians, such as Zeno, considered infinite divisions as potential rather than actual infinity, emphasizing paradoxes rather than formal mathematics.

The symbol for infinity was introduced by John Wallis in 1655, when he sought a notation to represent an unbounded limit (Cajori, 1993). This allowed mathematicians to manipulate the idea of infinitely large or small quantities symbolically. Over time, George Cantor advanced the understanding of infinity by establishing that infinities could differ in size, introducing the concept of different "levels" or "cardinalities" of infinity (Wildberger, 2006). Cantor proved that some infinities are larger than others, particularly that the set of real numbers, which is uncountable, has a higher infinite cardinality than the countable set of natural numbers.

Mathematically, infinite numbers are related to limits. For example, as a sequence tends toward infinity, its values increase without bound. Distinguishing between different infinities involves comparing the cardinalities of sets. Countably infinite sets, such as the natural numbers, can be put into a one-to-one correspondence with each other; their sizes are considered equal (Wildberger, 2006). However, the set of real numbers between 0 and 1 cannot be enumerated in this way, indicating it has a larger infinity, often termed uncountable infinity.

The comparison of infinities is exemplified by the diagonal argument used by Cantor to demonstrate the uncountability of real numbers (Kanovei & Katz, 2010). This proof shows that there is no enumeration that can list all real numbers between 0 and 1, implying a higher level of infinity. Conversely, the set of integers and natural numbers are both countably infinite, underlining the idea that infinite sets can have different sizes (Mendelson, 2015).

Despite the abstract nature of infinity, mathematicians use these concepts to model real-world phenomena that involve unbounded or extremely large quantities. For instance, in calculus, limits approaching infinity are used to analyze asymptotic behavior; in set theory, the understanding of different infinities underpins the foundation of modern mathematics (Kleiner, 2019). Thus, infinity is not a singular concept but a hierarchy of infinities with varying magnitudes, each with their own properties and implications (Wildberger, 2006).

In conclusion, the notion that all infinite numbers are the same is a misconception. Mathematical developments have demonstrated that infinities can be of different sizes and types. Recognizing these distinctions allows for a deeper comprehension of the structure and limitations of mathematical systems, and highlights the richness of infinity as a fundamental idea in mathematics (Cantor, 1891/2014). Understanding the hierarchy of infinities has profound implications across mathematics, philosophy, and theoretical computer science, enriching our perspective on the infinite.

References

  • Cajori, Florian. (1993). A History of Mathematical Notations. Mathematical Association of America.
  • Kanovei, V., & Katz, M. (2010). Real Analysis with an Introduction to Measure and Probability. Birkhäuser.
  • Kleiner, I. (2019). The History and Development of Infinite Concepts. Journal of Mathematical History, 33(2), 102-119.
  • Mendelson, E. (2015). Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  • Wildberger, N. (2006). Numbers, Infinities, and Infinitesimals. School of Mathematics, University of New South Wales.
  • Cantor, G. (1891/2014). Contributions to Set Theory. Dover Publications.