Stewardship And Governance Paper: Analyze Stewardship Theory ✓ Solved

Stewardship and Governance Paper: Analyze stewardship theory

Stewardship and Governance Paper: Analyze stewardship theory as it applies to governance, including ethical/biblical principles, leadership values, and governance structures, using APA formatting.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

Stewardship theory offers a complementary lens to traditional agency theory for understanding governance in organizations. While agency theory emphasizes self-interested agents and principal–agent dilemmas, stewardship theory posits that managers often act as stewards whose goals align with those of the organization, leadership, and stakeholders (Davis, Schoorman, & Donaldson, 1997). This alignment arises from trust, shared values, and a long-term orientation that prioritizes durable organizational performance over short-term self-interest (Jensen & Meckling, 1976). By reframing governance as a stewardship relationship, boards and executives can foster commitment, accountability, and ethical behavior that advance organizational resilience and legitimacy ( Freeman, 1984). The purpose of this paper is to analyze how stewardship theory informs governance, integrate ethical and biblical considerations where relevant, examine leadership values that reinforce stewardship, and discuss implications for governance structures and APA-style reporting.

Theoretical Framework: Stewardship Theory and Governance

Stewardship theory argues that managers, acting as stewards, are motivated to behave in the best interests of the organization and its stakeholders, often due to intrinsic motivation, trust-based relationships, and a sense of obligation to the firm’s long-term success (Davis, Schoorman, & Donaldson, 1997). In contrast to agency theory’s focus on monitoring and incentives to curb opportunistic behavior, stewardship assumes that cooperative goals, mutual trust, and shared norms guide decision-making. This theoretical frame has implications for governance design: it supports flatter hierarchies, collaborative boards, and leadership that emphasizes stewardship over mere compliance with external controls (Jensen & Meckling, 1976). Empirical work on stewardship suggests that governance arrangements that cultivate trust, transparency, and aligned incentives can reduce moral hazard and improve performance in the long run (Davis et al., 1997). Freeman’s stakeholder perspective further complements stewardship by recognizing that value creation extends beyond shareholders to include employees, customers, suppliers, communities, and the broader society, reinforcing governance that honors multiple legitimate claims (Freeman, 1984).

Ethical/Biblical Principles and Stewardship

Ethical considerations are central to stewardship in governance. Stewardship ethics emphasize accountability, transparency, integrity, and service orientation—principles that guide leadership choices, risk management, and stakeholder engagement (Ciulla, 2004). In many contexts, biblical notions of stewardship frame responsibility as trusteeship: assets and authority are entrusted to leaders who must steward them for the common good, practice fairness, and cultivate trust. Integrating these ethical foundations with organizational governance encourages leaders to model ethical conduct, embed values in policy, and pursue decisions that balance efficiency with social responsibility. While secular stewardship emphasizes fiduciary duty and accountability, biblical stewardship adds a moral dimension that disciplines ambition with accountability to a higher standard. This combined perspective aligns with stewardship theory’s emphasis on long-term value creation, ethical behavior, and legitimacy in the eyes of stakeholders (Davis et al., 1997; Ciulla, 2004).

Leadership Values and Governance

Leadership values shape governance outcomes by influencing how decisions are made, how information is shared, and how stakeholders are engaged. Stewardship-based leaders tend to exhibit humility, service-orientation, and a commitment to organizational mission, which supports trust-building, shared meaning, and collective efficacy (Northouse, 2019). When leaders internalize stewardship values, boards can move toward governance processes that emphasize collaboration, mentorship, and development of future leaders, rather than sole reliance on control mechanisms. This approach complements formal governance mechanisms like risk management, audit committees, and performance monitoring by embedding ethical norms into daily practice. Integrating stewardship with leadership theory helps explain why some boards show higher levels of engagement, long-term focus, and stakeholder consideration, particularly in organizations facing complex social and environmental responsibilities (Davis et al., 1997; Northouse, 2019).

Application to Organizational Governance

Practically applying stewardship theory to governance involves several key elements. First, governance structures should enable trust-based decision-making, with information transparency, open dialogue, and collaborative problem-solving between executives and board members (Monks & Minow, 2011). Second, incentive systems should align managerial rewards with long-term value and societal impact, reducing the emphasis on short-term stock-price movements (Jensen & Meckling, 1976). Third, ethical and biblical principles can inform policy development, codes of conduct, and stakeholder engagement strategies, reinforcing accountability and social legitimacy (Ciulla, 2004). Fourth, leadership values that prioritize service, accountability, and ethical stewardship can foster a culture where governance is practiced as a shared responsibility rather than a procedural obligation. This integrated approach can enhance resilience during crises, improve stakeholder trust, and support sustainable performance over time (Davis et al., 1997; Freeman, 1984).

Structure, APA Format, and Governance Outcomes

Adopting a stewardship perspective has implications for governance structure and reporting. Boards should emphasize clarity of purpose, roles, and expectations; ensure diverse and complementary skill sets; and implement processes for ongoing education and reflection on ethical issues and stakeholder impacts (OECD, 2015). From an APA standpoint, reporting should include transparent discussion of governance practices, ethical considerations, stakeholder engagement, and long-term value creation. The scholarly focus on stewardship supports rigorous analysis of governance outcomes, linking leadership values, ethical principles, and structural arrangements to measurable performance indicators and legitimacy in the eyes of stakeholders (Davis et al., 1997; Freeman, 1984).

Conclusion

Stewardship theory provides a robust framework for governance that emphasizes alignment of interests between leaders and the organization, trust-based relationships, and long-term value creation. When combined with ethical and biblical considerations and informed by leadership theory, stewardship-oriented governance can foster responsible decision-making, accountability, and legitimacy. While agency theory remains a powerful tool for understanding certain governance challenges, stewardship offers a complementary lens that highlights how shared values, integrity, and service can shape governance structures, culture, and outcomes. Future research and practice should continue to integrate stewardship with stakeholder theory, ethical leadership, and robust governance mechanisms to support sustainable organizational performance in a complex and interconnected world (Davis, Schoorman, & Donaldson, 1997; Freeman, 1984; Jensen & Meckling, 1976; Northouse, 2019).

References

1. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 23-45.
2. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
3. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
4. Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. (2011). Corporate Governance (2nd ed.). Wiley.
5. Tricker, B. J. (2019). Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practices (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
6. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD Publishing.
7. Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.
8. Ciulla, J. B. (2004). Ethics and Leadership. In J. A. Ciulla (Ed.), The Blackwell Handbook of Leadership (pp. 92-110). Blackwell.
9. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
10. Fitzgerald, C. (2020). Biblical stewardship in organizational ethics: A framework for leadership. Journal of Christian Ethics, 23(2), 210-232.