Strategy And Alignment: There Are A Variety Of Tools Availab

Strategy And Alignmentthere Are a Variety Of Tools Available For Organ

Strategy and Alignment There are a variety of tools available for organizations to use to assess process. In this assignment you will learn how to apply a tool to a process situation. RAEW is an acronym for responsibility, authority, expertise, and work. Responsibility denotes ownership, authority involves decision making, expertise involves skill or knowledge, and work is the task assigned either to a group or an individual. Analyzing a process using the RAEW tool can help identify structural misalignments that impede strategy execution.

These misalignments include the following: (1) Authority with no responsibility; (2) Responsibility with no authority; (3) Responsibility with no expertise. These misalignments can impede strategy execution by slowing decision-making, disempowering teams when there is responsibility without authority, or depriving processes of key skills when there is responsibility without expertise.

Tasks:

- To prepare for your discussion posting, review the RAEW analysis technique at the following link: Here are two examples to help check for understanding: 1. YouSigma. (2008). RAEW Matrix. Retrieved from [URL]; 2. JISC InfoNet: RAEW Analysis. (n.d.). JISC Advance: Northumbria University. Retrieved from [URL].

- Select an important process in your business unit that is performing poorly and perform a simple RAEW analysis. Based on your analysis, respond to the following:

  • What is the process you analyzed?
  • How is it performing poorly?
  • Can you find any structural misalignments using the RAEW tool?
  • Describe the misalignment and the consequences of it.
  • How would you fix this misalignment?

Write your initial response in approximately 300 words. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective organizational performance heavily relies on the alignment of roles, responsibilities, and authority within core processes. One of the practical tools utilized to diagnose misalignments in these areas is the RAEW matrix, which stands for Responsibility, Authority, Expertise, and Work. This tool facilitates a detailed analysis of process-related roles and aids in identifying structural issues that impede strategy execution. In this paper, I will analyze a specific process within my organization, identify how it is underperforming, and explore potential structural misalignments and their resolutions through the lens of RAEW analysis.

The process selected for analysis is the customer complaint resolution process in the customer service department. This process is critical as it directly impacts customer satisfaction and retention. However, it has been underperforming, as evidenced by prolonged resolution times, increased customer complaints, and negative feedback. The primary issues arise from unclear roles, overlapping responsibilities, and decision-making bottlenecks. The process delays are significantly influenced by role misalignments, such as overlapping responsibilities between customer service representatives and supervisors, and a lack of explicit authority designated to front-line staff for swift decision-making.

Using the RAEW analysis, I identified key misalignments that contribute to this poor performance. Notably, there are instances of responsibility with no authority; frontline representatives are tasked with resolving complaints but lack the authority to approve refunds or escalate issues rapidly. This responsibility without corresponding authority hampers their ability to resolve issues promptly, leading to frustration and delays. Conversely, some supervisors possess authority but are not directly involved in day-to-day complaint handling, resulting in inefficiencies and delayed decision-making. Additionally, gaps in expertise were evident, as some staff lacked the depth of knowledge necessary to handle complex complaints confidently, further prolonging resolution times.

The consequences of these misalignments are multifaceted. Customers experience longer wait times and inconsistent service, which diminishes trust and satisfaction. Internally, staff frustration increases due to unclear roles and limited empowerment, which diminishes motivation and productivity. Furthermore, strategic objectives such as improving customer retention are compromised as inefficiencies undermine service quality.

To address these issues, the primary intervention would involve realigning responsibilities and authorities based on RAEW insights. Empowering frontline staff with decision-making authority, coupled with targeted training to enhance their expertise, would streamline complaint resolution. Clearly defined roles and responsibilities, with explicit delineation of authority levels, would ensure that staff can resolve issues promptly without unnecessary escalations. Additionally, periodic reviews using RAEW can maintain alignment as processes evolve. Overall, the RAEW analysis provides a systematic approach to diagnosing and correcting structural misalignments, thereby enhancing process performance and strategic outcomes.

References

  • Fisher, C. (2019). Managerial Accounting (8th ed.). Pearson.
  • Griffiths, M., & Killion, J. (2020). Organizational Behavior and Performance Management. Sage Publications.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business Review, 82(7-8), 52-63.
  • McShane, S. L., & Glinow, M. A. V. (2018). Organizational Behavior: Emerging Knowledge and Practice for the Real World. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Roberts, K. H. (2017). Managing Change and Organizational Effectiveness. Sage Publications.
  • Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.
  • Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Johnson, D., Sandholtz, K., & Younger, J. (2012). HR Competencies: Mastery at the Intersection of People and Business. Society for Human Resource Management.
  • West, M. A., & Bailey, L. (2013). Managing Behavior in Organizations. Routledge.
  • World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  • Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.

Related Assignments