Structures And Frameworks Week 2 35pt Explain Formal And Inf

Structures And Frameworks Wk 2 35ptexplain Formal And Informal St

Explain formal and informal structures and decipher between traditional and non-traditional frameworks. Describe the characteristics that set functional, divisional, and matrix structures apart. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each design?

Paper For Above instruction

Organizational structures are essential frameworks that determine how activities such as task allocation, coordination, and supervision are directed toward achieving organizational goals. These frameworks can be broadly classified into formal and informal structures. Formal structures are officially designated systems and procedures documented in organizational charts, policies, and manuals, providing clarity and delineation of roles, responsibilities, and authority. They often embody traditional frameworks such as functional, divisional, and matrix structures. Informal structures, on the other hand, consist of unofficial relationships, social networks, and shared norms that develop organically and influence organizational dynamics beyond formal documentation.

Traditional frameworks primarily include functional, divisional, and matrix structures. The functional structure groups employees based on specialized functions such as marketing, finance, or operations. This setup promotes expertise and operational efficiency but may lead to siloed communication and limited flexibility. The divisional structure organizes units around products, services, or geographic locations, fostering focused attention and responsiveness but potentially causing resource duplication and competition among divisions. The matrix structure combines aspects of both functional and divisional frameworks, creating a grid where employees report to both a functional manager and a project or product manager. While this encourages collaboration and resource sharing, it can also lead to confusion in authority and accountability.

Each structure has distinct advantages and disadvantages. Functional structures excel in operational efficiency and specialization but risk limiting innovation and inter-departmental communication. Divisional structures enhance flexibility and market responsiveness but may become costly due to resource duplication. Matrix structures promote collaboration and dynamic resource use but can result in complex reporting relationships, conflicts, and ambiguity in decision-making.

Deciphering between traditional and non-traditional frameworks involves recognizing that traditional models often adhere to hierarchical, formal lines of authority, emphasizing stability and clear lines of control. Non-traditional models, such as flat or network organizations, prioritize flexibility, decentralization, and organic relationships, which can adapt rapidly to change but may lack clarity in responsibilities.

Understanding these frameworks enables managers to select the most appropriate design based on organizational size, goals, environment, and culture. Each framework embodies specific characteristics affecting communication, decision-making, and agility, which are critical to organizational effectiveness.

References

• Daft, R. L. (2016). Organization Theory and Design. Cengage Learning.
• Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational Theory, Design, and Change. Pearson.
• Roberts, K. H., & Taylor, F. W. (2018). Understanding organizational frameworks. Journal of Management Development, 37(5), 410-424.
• Hatch, M. J. (2018). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford University Press.
• Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and processes. Jossey-Bass.
• Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. John Wiley & Sons.
• Burke, R. J. (2014). Organizational design and change management. Routledge.
• David, F. R. (2015). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Pearson.