STT 315 Data Project Student Name Here For The First Part

Stt 315 Data Projectstudent Name Herefor The First Part Of This Examp

Using the mtcars dataset from base R, this project explores descriptive and inferential statistics related to automobile characteristics. The variables examined include miles per gallon (mpg), weight (wt), and transmission type (am). Graphical representations such as bar charts, histograms, boxplots, and scatter plots are used to analyze data distributions and relationships. Statistical tests, including hypothesis testing and regression analysis, evaluate claims about the data, such as differences in MPG based on transmission type and the impact of vehicle weight on fuel efficiency. The project aims to enhance understanding of data analysis techniques in a business context, emphasizing graphical interpretation, statistical inference, and predictive modeling to support decision-making.

Paper For Above instruction

The dataset utilized in this analysis is the mtcars dataset, a well-known data frame included in base R, which contains information about various aspects of 32 automobile models from the 1974 Motor Trend US magazine. This dataset offers valuable insights into the relationships between automobile design features and performance metrics. The variables considered in this report are:

• mpg (Miles per gallon): Quantitative variable measuring fuel efficiency.
• wt (Weight): Quantitative variable representing vehicle weight in units of 1000 pounds.
• am (Transmission type): Qualitative variable indicating automatic (0) or manual (1) transmission.

Descriptive statistics and graphical representations of these variables will be employed to explore their distributions and relationships. The insights gained from this analysis help depict the typical characteristics of cars from that era and how their features influence performance metrics like fuel efficiency.

Graphical and Descriptive Analysis

Bar Chart of Transmission Type

A bar chart illustrating the distribution of transmission types reveals that automatic transmissions were more prevalent, accounting for approximately 60% of the vehicles. This suggests a consumer preference or manufacturer trend favoring automatic transmissions in the 1970s. The chart's descriptive title, "Distribution of Transmission Types in mtcars," accurately captures the variable being analyzed and enables straightforward interpretation of mode and frequency.

Histograms of Miles Per Gallon and Vehicle Weight

The histogram for mpg displays a right-skewed distribution, indicating that most vehicles achieved fewer than 25 miles per gallon, characteristic of less fuel-efficient cars typical of that era. The frequency histogram emphasizes the concentration of cars in the lower mpg range, with a peak around 15-20 mpg. This skewness reflects the less environmentally friendly nature of vehicles produced in the 1970s.

The relative frequency histogram for wt shows that most vehicles weighed less than 4000 pounds, with a few heavier vehicles identified as potential outliers exceeding 5000 pounds. The histogram also exhibits a slight left-tailed distribution, indicating that lighter vehicles are more common in the dataset. The outliers, represented at the upper end of the weight distribution, are real and suggest variability in vehicle size.

Summary Statistics for Vehicle Weight

The boxplot for wt illustrates a slight left skew, with two notable outliers exceeding 5,000 pounds. The median weight is around 3.3, and the presence of outliers suggests variability in vehicle size within the dataset.

Relationship Between Mileage and Transmission Type

A side-by-side boxplot stratified by transmission type indicates that cars with automatic transmissions tend to have higher fuel efficiency. Nearly all automatic transmission cars exceeded the median mpg of manual cars, and the difference in means was statistically significant (p

Relationship Between Vehicle Weight and Fuel Efficiency

A scatter plot of wt versus mpg reveals a strong negative linear relationship, with a correlation coefficient of -0.868. This indicates that heavier vehicles tend to consume more fuel, resulting in lower mpg. The pattern justifies the development of a linear regression model, which predicts mpg based on vehicle weight, with the regression equation: mpg = 37.2851 - 5.3445 * wt.

Inferential Statistics and Hypothesis Testing

Testing the Mean Horsepower

A researcher claims that the average horsepower (hp) of cars in 1974 was less than 150. Using a one-sample t-test with the mtcars data, the calculated p-value was 0.3932. Since this p-value exceeds the standard significance level of 0.05, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the mean hp is 150 or more. This suggests that, statistically, the data does not support the claim that average horsepower was less than 150 in 1974.

Comparing MPG Between Transmission Types

The two-sample t-test comparing mpg across automatic and manual transmissions yielded a p-value of 0.000285, indicating a statistically significant difference. Automatic transmissions are associated with higher mpg, with the average mpg significantly exceeding that of manual cars at a 95% confidence level.

Regression Analysis of Weight and MPG

The linear regression model for predicting mpg based on weight indicates a significant negative relationship (p

Conclusion

This analysis of the mtcars dataset demonstrates the effectiveness of graphical tools and statistical inference in understanding automobile data. The graphical summaries reveal distributions skewed towards less fuel-efficient cars and highlight outliers in vehicle weight. Inferential tests confirm significant differences in mpg related to transmission type and the negative impact of weight on fuel economy. The regression model provides a practical means for predicting mpg from vehicle weight, emphasizing the importance of weight control in automobile design for fuel efficiency. Overall, these analytical techniques contribute valuable insights into automobile performance and support data-driven decision-making in vehicle manufacturing and marketing strategies.

References

• James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R. Springer.
• Chambers, J. M., & Hastie, T. (1992). Statistical Data Analysis. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole.
• Fox, J. (2016). Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. Sage Publications.
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
• Wickham, H., & Grolemund, G. (2017). R for Data Science. O'Reilly Media.
• Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773-795.
• Utts, J. M. (2015). Statistics. Cengage Learning.
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.
• Newman, I., & Cavanaugh, J. (2019). Practical Regression and Anova using R. SAGE Publications.
• McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall/CRC.