Student 1 From What You Have Learned So Far: How Can You Sta

Student 1from What You Have Learned So Far How Can You Start Represe

From what you have learned so far, how can you start representing enterprise systems? Start by making a paper-based model with a set of symbols that have understood meanings. We then translate the paper-based representation into a computerized information system. What makes this representation reach a good level of acceptance? Good models resemble their underlying reality as completely as possible, akin to reality. Good models can be expressed at different levels of precision; they may be broken down into smaller parts for detailed examination or aggregated for a holistic view. One model can be divided into parts, and simple drawings can show how different components interact or connect within the system.

Furthermore, a successful enterprise system representation should be organized, clear, and reflect the actual operations of the business. It should allow stakeholders to understand how the different parts of the enterprise interrelate and support decision-making processes. An effective way to achieve this is through systematic modeling—using diagrams, symbols, and layers—to capture the core functions and flow of information within the organization.

Paper For Above instruction

Enterprise systems are essential tools for modern organizations seeking efficiency, integration, and strategic advantage. Representing these complex systems effectively requires a combination of modeling techniques, clarity, and alignment with business realities. The initial step often involves creating paper-based models using standardized symbols and notation. These visual representations serve as foundational blueprints, enabling stakeholders to conceptualize the system’s structure, processes, and relationships.

Paper-based models are advantageous because they are simple, accessible, and facilitate collaboration during the early stages of system development. These models typically include symbols for entities such as departments, data flows, processes, and data stores. A common approach involves using flowcharts, data flow diagrams (DFDs), or Entity-Relationship (ER) diagrams to map out the system’s components and how they interact. This visualization helps in identifying redundancies, inefficiencies, or gaps within the enterprise processes.

Once a comprehensive paper model exists, it can be translated into a computerized information system. This transition involves refining the visual representation into detailed specifications that developers can implement in software. During the translation process, it is vital that the model maintains its fidelity to the real-world enterprise, ensuring that the digital system accurately reflects the operational requirements and interdependencies. This step also involves defining data structures, user interfaces, and data processing workflows based on the initial diagrams.

Acceptance of enterprise system models hinges on their accuracy, simplicity, and capacity to improve understanding. Good models should resemble the underlying reality, capturing the intricacies of the enterprise without unnecessary complexity. They should be adaptable, capable of representing different levels of detail—from high-level overviews to minute operational specifics—depending on the intended use.

To ensure broad acceptance, models must also be user-friendly and understandable to non-technical stakeholders. Providing visual clarity, using standardized symbols, and aligning the model with actual business operations are crucial. An example might include a flowchart illustrating the order fulfillment process, integrating sales, inventory management, and shipping departments seamlessly. Incorporating feedback from end users during the modeling stage further enhances acceptance, as it ensures the system meets practical needs.

Overall, starting with paper-based representations allows organizations to iterate quickly, incorporate stakeholder feedback, and refine their enterprise models before committing resources to formal software development. This approach ensures that the eventual computerized system is well-understood, validated by users, and aligned with strategic goals, leading to improved operational efficiency and competitive advantage.

References

• Davenport, T. H. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System. Harvard Business Review.
• Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Pearson.
• O'Brien, J. A., & Marakas, G. M. (2011). Management Information Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Information Technology for Management: Transforming Organizations in the Digital Age. Wiley.
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.
• Alter, S. (2003). The work system method: Connecting the information systems soul to the enterprise and its business processes. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 45(2), 119-131.
• Marcus, A., & Johnson, C. (2007). Visual Modeling and Business Process Simulation. Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 54-59.
• Chen, P. P. S., & Xie, J. (2017). Modeling Enterprise Systems: Managing Complexity and Relationships. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 151-163.
• Loucopoulos, P., & Vassiliadis, C. (2009). Designing Enterprise Integration and Interoperability. Information Systems, 34(1), 1-14.
• Barjis, J. (2011). Business Process Modeling and Simulation Tools. Information Systems, 36(2), 624-637.