Student Examples This Week We Have Been Discussing Strategie
Student Examplethis Week We Have Been Discussing Strategies For Argum
Student example This week, we have been discussing strategies for argumentation and persuasion. One of those strategies is engaging the opposition. This is an integral portion of your essay that not only strengthens your argument, but it presents you as a credible writer. Review the three main parts of an opposition paragraph below. A: The Concession : Graciously concede that there is another side to the argument.
B: The Rebuttal : You, as the writer, decide what is weak about the other side’s argument. C: Consolidation of your Claim : State your claim again using strong support. First , Use the template below to flesh out all three sections of the opposition paragraph. Next , referring to your completed template, develop a double-spaced opposition paragraph below. Upload the document containing both the template and your opposition paragraph for this week’s assignment. Use one the key words or phrases to help introduce the concession : Admittedly, Granted, I agree that, I cannot argue with, It is true that, You’re right, I accept, No doubt, Of course, I concede that, Perhaps, Certainly it’s the case A: CONCESSION B: REBUTTAL C: CONSOLIDATION OF CLAIM The case going to analyze
Paper For Above instruction
In addressing the issue of racial bias against African Americans in healthcare, it is essential to consider potential counterarguments that challenge the need for reform. Some skeptics might argue that the disparities in healthcare outcomes are due to individual choices rather than systemic bias. They could claim that efforts should focus on personal responsibility rather than addressing structural issues. Admittedly, there are concerns that emphasizing systemic racism might divert attention from personal accountability; however, this perspective overlooks the role of institutional practices and societal factors that significantly influence health outcomes for African Americans.
One weakness in the opposing argument is the assumption that health disparities solely result from personal decisions, ignoring the pervasive impact of biased medical practices, unequal access, and socioeconomic inequalities. Studies have demonstrated that African Americans often receive lower-quality care, face barriers to healthcare access, and are underrepresented in clinical trials, which collectively contribute to poorer health outcomes. By dismissing systemic factors, opponents fail to account for the broad range of social determinants that influence health. Therefore, the argument that individual responsibility alone accounts for disparities is flawed because it neglects the structural inequities embedded within the healthcare system.
Reaffirming the original claim, it is clear that racial bias in healthcare significantly contributes to disparities faced by African Americans. Structural racism manifests through implicit biases among healthcare providers, unequal distribution of resources, and discriminatory policies that limit access to necessary care. Recognizing these systemic issues is crucial for developing effective solutions, such as cultural competency training for providers, policy reforms to improve equitable access, and increased representation of African Americans in healthcare research. Addressing the systemic roots of racial bias will lead to more equitable health outcomes and demonstrate a commitment to justice and fairness. In conclusion, acknowledging and confronting the systemic barriers in healthcare is essential to closing the disparity gap and ensuring better health equity for African American communities.