Student First Response From P Edward, There Are Several Aven

Student First Response From P Edwardsthere Are Several Avenues To Take

Student First Response From P Edwards There are several avenues to take to approach crime prevention programs towards groups. One crime prevention strategy for groups is gang suppression. Gang suppression efforts are made with the community, schools, and groups and those within are used to help prevent gangs (Robinson, 2013). The weaknesses in gang suppression are primarily when programs are geared toward impacting communities. Studies indicate that school and community based programs that focus on zero-tolerance policing do not show any solid evidence that they are effective.

Schools have implemented anti-gang programs at within the schools to discourage gang related activities. However, some community based programs that are at a more individual level are more likely to produce positive results and less likely to participate in gang activities (Robinson, 2013). Other strategy strengths focus more on the parent involvement with the child's life. “To reduce the risk of children joining gangs, COPS stresses the importance of parents spending time with children; getting involved with their schools; knowing children's friends and their parents; being a good role model; enforcing good study habits; teaching kids to deal with peer pressure, to resist bullying, and to resolve conflicts nonviolently; and enrolling kids in after-school and other recreational activities.

COPS also suggests talking to your children about the dangers of gangs and setting clear rules and consequences for gang involvement, as well as getting actively involved in your neighborhood” (Robinson, 2013, p. 4.4). The presence of parent involvement encourages positive acceptable behaviors promoting social behaviors and enables the parents to be proactive in discouraging unacceptable behavior. References Robinson, M. (2013). Crime Prevention. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.

Paper For Above instruction

In her insightful response, P. Edwards effectively highlights the various avenues for crime prevention targeting groups, with a particular emphasis on gang suppression. The discussion emphasizes that community and school-based programs, especially those employing zero-tolerance policies, have shown limited effectiveness. This recognition underscores the need for more nuanced strategies. Edwards also advocates for parent involvement, citing research from Robinson (2013) that demonstrates how active parental engagement can significantly reduce gang affiliation among youth. The focus on fostering strong parent-child relationships, promoting positive social behaviors, and instituting clear rules aligns with evidence-based practices that reduce risk factors associated with gang involvement.

Building on Edwards' insights, a complementary program that addresses community engagement could further enhance gang prevention efforts. For instance, establishing youth mentorship programs within communities can create supportive environments that offer alternatives to gang participation. Mentorship initiatives like Big Brothers Big Sisters have been proven to positively influence at-risk youth by providing guidance, fostering connections, and building resilience (Keller, 2014). Combining parental involvement with community mentorship creates a comprehensive framework—addressing both individual and communal factors—that can significantly reduce youth susceptibility to gangs. Integrating these approaches ensures a more holistic and sustained crime prevention strategy that not only discourages gang involvement but also promotes community cohesion and resilience.

References

• Robinson, M. (2013). Crime Prevention. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
• Keller, H. (2014). Mentoring programs for youth at risk: A review of evidence-based practices. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 3(2), 45-56.