Submit The Two Sections Of Your Proposal's Rough Draft
Submit The Two Sections Of The Rough Draft Of Your Proposal Here As A
Submit the two sections of the rough draft of your proposal here as a Word or PDF document by midnight on Saturday. You only have to submit two sections: the Current Problem and the Proposed Research. The draft is worth 25 points, and these points are "all or nothing." To get the "All or Nothing" 25 points for this assignment, you must make sure to do the following two items: The draft must be submitted on time (midnight on Saturday) The rough draft must contain the two required sections: Current Problem (formally called "Introduction") and Proposed Research (formally called "Proposed Solutions"). The Current Problem section must contain substantial research-- at least three sources. This section explains the problem the business is experiencing and what solutions you are proposing to research to solve the problem for the company.
Your research must prove how the problem is negatively impacting the business. Your research must also prove that solving the problem will add significant value to the company (usually the value is money, but it could be increased efficiency, happier customers/employees, better reputation, etc.). The Proposed Research section must contain a detailed plan of action in the form of tasks. This section outlines the steps you will take to research the solutions to determine which of your three solutions best fits the company.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The process of developing an effective proposal for a business problem involves detailed research and strategic planning. In this context, the initial step is to identify a pressing issue that impacts the company's performance and to propose viable solutions supported by credible evidence. This paper discusses how to structure the initial rough draft of such a proposal by focusing on the crucial sections of the Current Problem and Proposed Research, ensuring thorough research and clear articulation of the actions required for solution validation.
The Current Problem: Articulating the Business Issue
The Current Problem section functions as the introduction to the proposal and must clearly state the issue affecting the business. It requires thorough research and at least three credible sources to substantiate the claims. The core purpose of this section is to illustrate how the problem impairs the company’s operations, financial status, reputation, or employee morale. For example, a business experiencing declining sales due to poor customer engagement must include data demonstrating this decline and analyze underlying causes such as ineffective marketing strategies or customer dissatisfaction.
Research plays an essential role in this section. It must convincingly demonstrate the negative impact of the problem on the business, including metrics such as revenue loss, market share decline, or customer retention issues. Furthermore, the research should make a compelling case for resolving the problem by highlighting potential benefits such as increased profitability, operational efficiency, improved customer satisfaction, or enhanced brand reputation. For instance, a study on the effects of poor customer service on customer loyalty and referral rates could reinforce the importance of addressing customer engagement issues.
The credibility of sources is critical; academic journals, industry reports, case studies, or reputable news outlets should underpin the claims. A well-researched problem statement establishes the need for investigation and guides the subsequent proposed solutions. Effective problem articulation aligns with research findings, quantifies impacts where possible, and clearly articulates the value of resolving the issue.
The Proposed Research: Designing a Step-by-Step Plan
The Proposed Research section delineates the steps necessary to explore and validate solutions to the identified problem. Its purpose is to present a detailed, actionable plan of research tasks to evaluate three potential solutions. This section should strategically outline specific activities, methodologies, and timelines to ensure efficient and comprehensive investigation.
A key component of this section is the identification of three plausible solutions. Each of these solutions should be feasible, aligned with business goals, and capable of addressing the core problem effectively. The plan of action should specify how each solution will be researched: data collection methods, stakeholder interviews, cost-benefit analyses, pilot programs, or simulations. The goal is to determine which solution offers the best balance of effectiveness, cost, and implementation feasibility.
Furthermore, each step should include precise action items such as gathering relevant data, consulting with key stakeholders, analyzing costs and benefits, and testing solutions in small-scale trials. A detailed timeline, including milestones for assessment and decision points, enhances plan clarity. For example, an initial data gathering phase might last two weeks, followed by stakeholder consultations over the next month, culminating in a comparative analysis phase.
This structured approach ensures that the evaluation process is systematic and transparent, leading to an informed decision that maximizes business value. The outcomes of the research will guide the company in implementing the most suitable solution, thereby effectively mitigating the problem and contributing to organizational goals.
Conclusion
Creating a comprehensive initial draft for a business proposal requires a meticulous balance of research and planning. The Current Problem section must convincingly articulate the issue with substantive evidence, demonstrating its negative impact and the potential value of its resolution. Simultaneously, the Proposed Research section must outline a methodical plan for exploring potential solutions through specific tasks and timeframes. Together, these sections form the foundation for a compelling, data-driven proposal capable of guiding effective business decisions.
References
1. Cooper, R. G., & Edgett, S. J. (2008). The stage-gate idea-to-launch process—Update, what's new, and next-gen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213-232.
2. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
3. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson.
4. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
5. Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary Strategy Analysis (10th ed.). Wiley.
6. Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2017). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson.
7. Harvard Business Review. (2019). Using Data to Drive Business Performance. Harvard Business Publishing.
8. McKinsey & Company. (2021). The future of analytics in business. McKinsey Quarterly.
9. Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management (12th ed.). Pearson.
10. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.