Submit Week 3 Project: Team Roles Section 7 Instructions Use

Submit Week 3project Team Roles Section 7instructionsuse Your Imagin

Use your imagination to identify other project team members you will need to help make this project a success. In the table below, enter information about each of these team members. Project Team Roles ID, Title, Name, Role, Key Responsibilities. Additionally, include the team's ethics and ground rules related to responsibility, respect, fairness, honesty, and academic integrity.

Read through the information about ethics and academic integrity. Then, in the Team Ground Rules area, list the rules you would implement as a project manager for your project team.

Ethics: The Project Management Institute’s Code of Ethics emphasizes responsibility, respect, fairness, and honesty.

Academic Integrity: As a student, create and submit original work and report instances of cheating or plagiarism.

Team Ground Rules: List at least nine rules regarding communication, collaboration, and accountability within your team.

Complete the sections on:

• Management Communication Plan: audiences, purpose, method, frequency, organizer, scribe, sender, and date of communication.
• Risk Register: identify potential risks, describe each, categorize, assess probability and impact, determine mitigation strategies, and assign owners.
• Probability and Impact Matrix: summarize risks and plot them based on their probability and impact scores.
• Budget Estimate: input quantities and unit costs for expenses, then calculate total costs, actual costs, differences, and variances.
• Project Schedule Estimate: list milestones, their completion dates, and total project duration.
• Project Baselines: set scope, cost, and schedule baselines derived from the previous sections.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective project management relies heavily on assembling a competent and ethically grounded team. Identifying necessary team members, establishing ground rules, and ensuring clear communication are foundational steps toward project success. The project team must include individuals with diverse skills tailored to the project's specific needs, exemplified by roles such as project coordinators, finance managers, communication specialists, and technical experts. These roles facilitate a cohesive workflow, foster accountability, and contribute unique perspectives essential for problem-solving and innovation.

Beyond team composition, upholding a robust ethical framework is critical. The PMI Code of Ethics underscores core values that guide professional conduct—responsibility, respect, fairness, and honesty. Responsibility involves owning one’s decisions and actions, recognizing that errors can undermine project integrity. Respect entails value-driven interactions among team members, stakeholders, and external partners, fostering trust and collaboration. Fairness requires impartiality and objective decision-making, preventing biases from compromising judgments. Honesty promotes transparency, undergirding communication and accountability. Embedding these principles into daily operations minimizes risks of misconduct and cultivates an environment of mutual trust and professionalism.

Equally vital is cultivating a team environment rooted in clear ground rules, especially regarding communication and ethics. Ground rules should specify expectations for responsiveness, confidentiality, respectful discourse, punctuality, and quality of work. For example, team members might agree to weekly updates via email or meetings, promote open dialogue without discrimination, and respect deadlines and resource sharing. Such rules ensure alignment and reduce misunderstandings, thereby enhancing efficiency and morale.

Academic integrity forms the backbone of professional conduct, emphasizing originality and honesty in all work submissions. For students managing projects, it involves creating authentic content, properly citing sources, and reporting unethical behaviors. Vigilance against plagiarism protects individual reputation and maintains the credibility of the project and institution.

Communication is another pillar of effective project management. A detailed management plan ensures that key audiences—stakeholders, team members, vendors—receive targeted information through appropriate channels at suitable intervals. Regular updates via emails, meetings, or digital dashboards foster transparency and enable prompt decision-making. Designating organizers, scribes, and senders ensures accountability, while scheduling the frequency of updates prevents information overload or gaps.

Risk management is integral to preventing setbacks. Developing a comprehensive risk register involves identifying potential threats, analyzing their probability and impact, and devising mitigation strategies such as avoidance, reduction, retention, or sharing. For example, financial risks might be mitigated by contingency budgets, while resource shortages can be addressed through proactive planning. Assigning risk owners and defining triggers or thresholds facilitate swift responses, minimizing adverse effects on project objectives.

The probability-impact matrix visually represents risks to prioritize risk responses. Risks categorized with high probability and high impact require immediate attention, while those with lower scores may be monitored. This matrix informs resource allocation and contingency planning, ensuring readiness for potential challenges.

Budget estimation involves detailed quantification of expenses, including marketing, operational costs, and miscellaneous expenditures. Calculations of total costs, actual expenditures, and variances support financial control and transparency.

A well-structured project schedule delineates milestones, deadlines, and critical path activities, providing a timeline for project execution and measurement of progress. Incorporating baseline measures enables tracking deviations and implementing corrective actions.

Finally, establishing project baselines for scope, cost, and schedule ensures that project performance aligns with initial objectives. These benchmarks serve as reference points for evaluating progress and making informed adjustments throughout the project lifecycle.

References

• Aguide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). (2021). Project Management Institute.
• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Schmidt, R. (2019). Ethical Principles for Project Managers. International Journal of Business Ethics, 32(4), 567-580.
• Turner, R. (2014). Handbook of Project-Based Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2021). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill.
• PMI. (2021). Code of Ethics & Professional Conduct. Project Management Institute.
• Meredith, J.R., & Shafer, S.M. (2017). Project Management: A Strategic Decision-Making Approach. Wiley.
• Heldman, K. (2018). PMP: Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. Sybex.
• Thamhain, H. J. (2014). Managing Project Risks. Journal of Business Strategy, 35(6), 37-44.