Summarizing Last Week's Written Assignment Consisted Of An

Summarizinglast Week Your Written Assignment Consisted Of Analyzing A

Last week, your written assignment involved analyzing a source, and this week, the focus shifts to summarizing a source. These skills—analyzing and summarizing—are essential in different contexts but both are necessary for your research argument paper. Developing proficiency in both will also benefit your personal and professional communication.

The goal of this summary is to condense the source's information objectively. Avoid personal opinions, judgments, or narratives. Strive for brevity, accuracy, and completeness, capturing the essence of the reading without distortion. To begin, use the EBSCOhost link to locate the article: Friedman, T. L., & Mandelbaum, M. (2011). America really was that great (but that doesn’t mean we are now). Foreign Policy, (189), 76-78. Take notes or outline the article to facilitate understanding.

Your summary must adhere to specific guidelines: it should be between 150 and 250 words, incorporate direct quotations and paraphrases with proper APA in-text citations, and include attribution tags that establish authority. Personal opinions should be excluded; the writing must be clear, concise, and written in third-person perspective. An APA style References page must be included, and the document should be carefully edited for mechanical accuracy.

Use the following checklist to ensure your summary meets the criteria: Does it reflect the main ideas? Are effective transitions used? Is personal opinion avoided? Can any information be omitted without loss? Is the summary effective and complete? Consider whether any additions or deletions are necessary to fulfill the assignment requirements.

Paper For Above instruction

The article by Friedman and Mandelbaum (2011) explores the concept of America's historical greatness and offers a nuanced perspective on its current state. The authors argue that while America truly was a global leader in economic and military strength during its earlier years, recent developments indicate a decline or transformation of its global influence. Friedman and Mandelbaum emphasize that understanding America's past achievements provides insight into its present challenges and potential future directions. They note that “America's rise was fueled by innovation, resilience, and an expansive sense of opportunity” (Friedman & Mandelbaum, 2011, p.77). However, they caution against complacency by asserting that “our current trajectory requires renewed commitment to the principles that once made us great” (Friedman & Mandelbaum, 2011, p.78). The authors also highlight the importance of maintaining America's values of leadership and engagement on the international stage. Throughout the article, Friedman and Mandelbaum, both authoritative voices in foreign policy analysis, support their points with historical data and contemporary examples, underscoring the significance of adapting America's strengths to contemporary geopolitical realities. Their analysis underscores that understanding historical context is crucial for grasping the nation's current situation and guiding future policy.

References

• Friedman, T. L., & Mandelbaum, M. (2011). America really was that great (but that doesn't mean we are now). Foreign Policy, (189), 76-78.