Summarize Two Examples Of Human Resources And Business Strat

Summarize Two Examples Of Human Resources And Business Strategy Framew

Summarize two examples of human resources and business strategy frameworks or best practices. Describe two different approaches to how a company can align their human resources and business strategies. Recommend one of the approaches for a company that wants to increase diversity or competitive advantage. Support your recommendation with specific evidence related to the chosen outcome (diversity or competitive advantage). Use three quality sources to support your writing.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Successful organizations recognize the critical interplay between human resources (HR) strategies and overarching business strategies. Aligning HR practices with business objectives not only fosters organizational effectiveness but also enhances competitive advantage and promotes diversity initiatives. This paper explores two prominent frameworks that facilitate this alignment: the Resource-Based View (RBV) and the Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) approach. It compares these models, elaborates on their application in aligning HR with business goals, and recommends one approach for a company aiming to increase diversity or gain a competitive edge, supported by credible evidence.

Framewor 1: Resource-Based View (RBV) of HR and Business Strategy

The Resource-Based View (RBV) is a strategic framework that emphasizes leveraging internal resources to gain a sustainable competitive advantage (Barney, 1991). Within HR, this approach advocates for developing unique, valuable, and difficult-to-imitate human capital—such as specialized skills or organizational culture—that align with business objectives. Companies implementing RBV-intensive HR strategies focus on talent acquisition, development, and retention practices that cultivate core competencies (Wernerfelt, 1984). For example, firms like Google emphasize innovative employee development, fostering a culture of creativity and learning that supports their business strategy of innovation-driven growth (Bock, 2015). This alignment ensures that HR practices directly contribute to the organization’s strategic differentiation.

Framework 2: Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM)

The SHRM approach integrates HR policies directly with strategic business planning. It emphasizes proactive alignment, emphasizing that HR should be a strategic partner rather than solely an administrative function (Wright & McMahan, 1992). This framework advocates for HR strategies that are designed around organizational goals, involving practices such as strategic staffing, performance management, and succession planning aligned with long-term objectives. For example, IBM’s strategic HR initiatives focus on leadership development and diversity programs aligned with their global business strategy—aiming to foster innovation and market adaptability (Ulrich, 1997). SHRM promotes a systemic and integrated approach to ensure that HR functions support overarching business strategies, thus facilitating flexibility, adaptation, and value creation.

Comparison and Application

Both frameworks serve to align HR practices with business strategies but differ in emphasis. The RBV centers on internal resources, particularly unique human capital, as a source of competitive advantage, emphasizing cultivating exclusive talent that cannot be easily replicated. In contrast, SHRM emphasizes systemic integration and strategic partnership, ensuring that HR practices proactively support business goals through alignment and organizational coherence.

For a company seeking to increase diversity or enhance competitive advantage, the choice of framework will influence its HR initiatives. RBV’s focus on developing unique human capital aligns well with diversity initiatives, as diverse talent pools contribute to innovative capabilities and resilience in competitive markets (Jayne & Dipboye, 2004). Conversely, SHRM’s systemic, strategic alignment can embed diversity into organizational practices, fostering inclusive cultures that support innovation and adaptability.

Recommendation: Using the SHRM Approach for Diversity and Competitive Advantage

Considering the goal of increasing diversity and strengthening competitive advantage, the Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) approach emerges as the most effective framework. Its systemic nature ensures that diversity initiatives are integrated into core business practices rather than isolated efforts. For example, organizations like Sodexo have successfully embedded diversity and inclusion strategies into their comprehensive business strategies, resulting in higher employee engagement and enhanced innovation (Dhanda & Sarkar, 2020).

Research indicates that diversity directly correlates with better decision-making, increased creativity, and improved financial performance (Hunt et al., 2018). By systematically incorporating diversity into their HR strategy, firms can build inclusive cultures, attract diverse talent, and respond flexibly to global market demands. SHRM’s proactive and integrated model ensures that diversity initiatives are aligned with business goals, leading to sustainable competitive advantages.

Supporting Evidence

Empirical studies corroborate the added value of integrating diversity into strategic HR practices. Hunt et al. (2018) found that organizations with higher levels of diversity management outperform their counterparts in innovation and market growth. Furthermore, Cox and Blake (1991) highlighted the competitive advantages derived from a diverse workforce, including increased flexibility and problem-solving capabilities. These insights affirm that the SHRM approach, which aligns HR with strategic objectives and embeds diversity into organizational culture, can effectively enhance competitive advantage.

Conclusion

Aligning HR and business strategies is crucial for organizational success. The Resource-Based View and Strategic Human Resource Management provide robust frameworks for this purpose. While RBV emphasizes leveraging unique internal resources, SHRM focuses on systemic integration of HR practices with strategic goals. For companies aiming to increase diversity and competitive advantage, SHRM offers a comprehensive and proactive approach, embedding inclusion into core strategies to drive innovation, market responsiveness, and sustained growth. Implementing such integrated strategies positions organizations favorably in the increasingly competitive, globalized business environment.

References

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
  • Bock, L. (2015). Work Rules!: Insights from Inside Google That Will Transform How You Live and Lead. Twelve.
  • Cox, T., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing Cultural Diversity: Implications for Organizational Competitiveness. The Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45–56.
  • Dhanda, K., & Sarkar, S. (2020). Diversity Management and Organizational Performance: A Review. Journal of Business Diversity, 20(2), 85–98.
  • Hunt, V., Layton, D., & Prince, S. (2018). Why Diversity Matters. McKinsey & Company.
  • Jayne, M. E., & Dipboye, R. L. (2004). Leveraging Diversity to Improve Business Performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 691–702.
  • Ulrich, D. (1997). Human Resources and Competitive Advantage. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 17–31.
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
  • Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 295–320.

Related Assignments