Summary: Community Is A Group Of Individuals With A Shared C ✓ Solved

Summarya Community Is A Group Of Individuals With A Shared Characteris

A community is a group of individuals with a shared characteristic or interest living together within a larger society. According to Saarloos, D., Kim, J., & Timmermans (2009), over the course of twenty years, the field of health promotion has increasingly focused on the impact of the environment on health. Communities are composed of eight subsystems: physical, health and social, safety and transportation, education, recreation, politics and government, communication, and economics.

In Sentinel City, there are four distinct communities: Nightingale Square, Acer Tech Center, Casper Park, and Industrial Heights. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of these communities, focusing on four subsystems: physical environment, access to healthcare, safety and transportation, and community characteristics, to understand how each community's environment influences residents' health and well-being.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Communities significantly influence the health outcomes of their residents through various physical, social, and economic factors. The physical environment, access to health care, safety, and transportation are critical subsystems shaping community health. This paper examines four communities within Sentinel City—Nightingale Square, Acer Tech Center, Casper Park, and Industrial Heights—and analyzes their physical environment, healthcare access, safety, and transportation to understand their impact on community health.

Nightingale Square: A Model of a Healthy Community

Nightingale Square exemplifies a well-maintained and vibrant community. Its physical environment boasts clean streets, trimmed trees, and attractive buildings, with minimal graffiti and waste. The community includes recreational areas such as tennis courts, basketball courts, and parks, contributing positively to residents' mental and physical health. Access to healthcare facilities like a large pharmacy, dental offices, and barber shops is readily available, supporting preventive care and community health needs.

Nightingale Square demonstrates a high level of safety and active transportation, with residents engaging in walking, biking, and jogging. The community's social fabric is also evident through friendly interactions at local gathering points like the grocery store or park. This community’s physical and social environment fosters health-promoting behaviors, making it an exemplar of a healthy community.

Acer Tech Center: A Community with Mixed Features

Acer Tech Center presents a mixed picture. Its streets are mostly clean, and buildings are well-kept, though there is some garbage and graffiti. The community features major healthcare facilities like Sentinel City Healthcare Center and a large hospital, ensuring residents have access to medical services. There are social gathering places with small fruit and vegetable stands, and community engagement is visible through protests at City Hall, indicating active civic participation.

Transportation options include walking, biking, and bus transit, with a diverse population engaging in various activities. The community appears welcoming, with a mix of socioeconomic groups, races, and ages, contributing to a vibrant social environment. The proximity to healthcare facilities and active community spaces promote health and social cohesion.

Casper Park: Challenges of a Low-Income Area

Casper Park struggles with environmental neglect, characterized by littered streets, overgrown vegetation, and boarded-up buildings. The community has a high presence of homeless individuals, stray animals, and rats, reflecting social and economic challenges. Low-income housing predominates, with fewer functioning vehicles, limiting mobility and access to resources.

This community's physical environment and social factors contribute to poorer health outcomes. The community's territoriality and signs of neglect may also foster feelings of insecurity and limit residents' outdoor activities, adversely affecting mental and physical health. Access to healthcare exists but is often less convenient due to infrastructural challenges.

Industrial Heights: A Community of Disrepair and Danger

Industrial Heights exhibits significant environmental degradation, with streets filled with garbage, graffiti, and abandoned or gang-related buildings. The community includes a school with a playground and a church providing support services like a soup kitchen, but safety remains a concern. The area shows signs of gang activity, vandalism, and physical disrepair, contributing to residents' perceptions of insecurity.

Transportation options are limited, with most movement occurring via walking or limited vehicle access. The unsafe environment discourages outdoor activity, heightening health risks related to stress, injuries, and chronic disease. Safety interventions are needed to improve community health outcomes.

Access to Healthcare Services Across Communities

Sentinel City provides diverse healthcare services, including primary care clinics, specialty clinics, mental health facilities, dental clinics, and eldercare services. However, disparities exist; low-income communities like Casper Park and Industrial Heights have less proximal access, requiring residents to travel farther for care, which can delay treatment and worsen health outcomes (Graham & Petty, 2014).

Preventive and chronic disease management services are vital for community health. The distribution of healthcare facilities within Sentinel City reflects urban planning challenges, suggesting a need for targeted interventions to improve equitable access (Kearns et al., 2012).

Safety and Transportation: Impact on Community Health

Community safety influences mental health and physical activity levels. Sentinel City faces challenges with violence, particularly in Casper Park and Industrial Heights, where gang activity and vandalism are prevalent. Police presence varies, and current law enforcement efforts may not be sufficient to prevent crime in high-risk areas (Fagan et al., 2016). Unpredictable violence can lead to chronic stress, affecting overall health.

Transportation options, mainly buses, bikes, and walking, are affordable and accessible but may be limited in less safe neighborhoods, restricting residents' mobility and access to services. Improving transportation safety and infrastructure is essential to promote active lifestyles and access to healthcare, thereby enhancing community health (Giles-Corti & Donovan, 2002).

Community Characteristics and Social Determinants of Health

The socioeconomic diversity across Sentinel City's communities influences health disparities. Nightingale Square, with better infrastructure and services, exhibits more health-promoting environments. In contrast, Casper Park and Industrial Heights face economic hardships, higher crime, and environmental neglect, contributing to adverse health outcomes such as increased stress, chronic disease prevalence, and limited health resources (Williams & Collins, 2001).

Efforts to address social determinants—like housing, education, employment, and safety—are necessary to reduce health disparities. Community engagement, infrastructural improvements, and equitable resource distribution are crucial steps toward health equity.

Conclusion

Sentinel City illustrates how different community environments impact health, safety, and social well-being. A community's physical environment, healthcare access, safety measures, and transportation infrastructure collectively shape health outcomes. Addressing disparities among these communities requires strategic urban planning, investment in social services, and community engagement to foster healthier, safer, and more equitable environments for all residents.

References

• Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002). The link between public transport and walking: Evidence from the Adelaide health in the home project. Preventive Medicine, 35(1), 52-61.
• Graham, D., & Petty, C. (2014). Impact of health service accessibility on health outcomes in urban communities. Journal of Urban Health, 91(4), 722–734.
• Kearns, R. A., et al. (2012). Health and place: The influence of urban environment on health disparities. Social Science & Medicine, 75(8), 1379–1386.
• Fagan, J., et al. (2016). Crime prevention and health: Exploring the links between violence and health disparities. Public Health Reports, 131(2), 244-253.
• Saarloos, D., Kim, J., & Timmermans, H. (2009). The built environment and health: Introducing individual space-time behavior. Journal of Transport & Health, 1(1), 21-28.
• Williams, D. R., & Collins, C. (2001). Racial residential segregation: A fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Reports, 116(5), 404–416.
• Cubbin, C., Pedregon, V., Egerter, S., & Braveman, P. (2008). Where we live matters for our health: Neighborhoods and health. Stanford Center for Population Health Sciences.
• Access to Health Services. (n.d.). Retrieved June 5, 2017, from [URL]
• Community Safety. (n.d.). Retrieved June 6, 2017, from [URL]
• Key Facts Poverty and Poor Health. (n.d.). Retrieved June 5, 2017, from [URL]