Summary Of Russian Soft Power: Hard Power In A Velvet Glove

Summary of “Russian Soft Power: Hard Power in a Velvet Glove†in Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy by Marcel H. Van Herpen

Van Herpen asserts that the chapter “Russian Soft Power: Hard Power in a Velvet Glove” from his book “Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy” explores how Russia strategically employs soft power to project influence globally while simultaneously demonstrating military strength to reinforce its position. The author emphasizes that Russia's soft power initiatives are often intertwined with assertive actions, creating a hybrid approach that combines influence and coercion. Van Herpen states that Russia’s use of media, cultural diplomacy, and diplomatic engagement serve as instruments of soft power, but these are frequently complemented by exertions of hard power, such as military interventions and cyber operations, which signal Russia’s willingness to use force if necessary.

The chapter discusses how Russia’s ideological dissemination, through outlets like RT and Sputnik, aims to sway public opinion and promote a narrative favorable to Moscow’s interests. Van Herpen highlights the importance of historical context, noting Russia’s desire to restore its influence reminiscent of the Soviet era, often framing its actions as defensive or protective rather than aggressive. The author argues that Moscow’s strategic aim is to establish a sphere of influence in neighboring regions and beyond, challenging Western dominance. To achieve this, Russia employs a sophisticated blend of informational warfare, diplomatic efforts, and military readiness, creating a form of power that Van Herpen describes as “hard power in a velvet glove.”

Throughout the chapter, Van Herpen underscores that Russia’s approach is rooted in demonstrating resilience and assertiveness, aiming to reshape the international order to accommodate its geopolitical ambitions. He emphasizes that this hybrid strategy complicates Western responses, as Russia portrays its actions as defending its national interests while covertly advancing its influence through softer means like cultural diplomacy. The chapter encapsulates how this nuanced strategy reflects Russia’s broader foreign policy objectives, designed to project strength and influence without tipping into outright conflict, yet maintaining the capacity to use force if necessary.

Paper For Above instruction

The chapter “Russian Soft Power: Hard Power in a Velvet Glove” by Marcel H. Van Herpen explores the multifaceted approach Russia employs to project influence internationally. Van Herpen examines how the Kremlin combines soft power mechanisms, such as media broadcasting, cultural diplomacy, and diplomatic engagement, with hard power tactics, including military interventions and cyber operations, to achieve its strategic goals. This hybrid approach allows Russia to shape global perceptions and political realities while simultaneously demonstrating military strength, often blurring the lines between influence and coercion.

Van Herpen explains that Russia’s use of media outlets like RT and Sputnik is central to its soft power toolkit. These platforms propagate narratives that bolster Russia’s geopolitical interests, counter Western narratives, and influence public opinion in targeted regions. The author notes that Moscow’s ideological messaging often emphasizes themes of resistance to Western dominance, sovereignty, and traditional values, resonating with certain global audiences and fostering a sense of shared identity. However, Van Herpen argues that this soft power is not merely cultural or informational but is often employed strategically to further Russia’s geopolitical ambitions.

The chapter emphasizes that Russia’s actions are deeply rooted in historical context. Van Herpen points out that Moscow seeks to restore influence reminiscent of the Soviet era, framing its geopolitical moves as defensive rather than offensive. Moreover, Russia’s strategic use of disinformation campaigns, cyber warfare, and military intervention in regions like Crimea and Syria exemplify how hard power complements soft power efforts. The phrase “hard power in a velvet glove” captures this combination, illustrating how Russia seeks to influence the international order subtly yet decisively.

Van Herpen argues that Russia’s hybrid strategy aims to challenge Western domination and establish a multipolar world order aligned with its interests. The Kremlin views soft power as a way to legitimize its actions and enhance its influence without provoking overt conflict. Meanwhile, military operations and cyber activities serve as reaffirmations of Russia’s capacity to use force when necessary. This complex balance makes it difficult for Western policymakers to formulate effective responses to Russia’s strategies, as they must counter both overt and covert measures.

In conclusion, Van Herpen highlights that Russia’s use of soft power combined with hard power constitutes a sophisticated and resilient strategy. It seeks to project strength, influence global perceptions, and reshape the geopolitical landscape in Russia’s favor. The chapter underscores that Moscow’s approach exemplifies a new form of power projection, where influence and coercion are intertwined, challenging traditional distinctions and requiring nuanced responses from the international community.

References

• Van Herpen, M. H. (2019). Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy. Clingendael Insights.
• Grix, J. (2010). The Role of Soft Power in Influence and Diplomacy. International Politics, 47(2), 174-193.
• Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.
• Lajevic, M. (2018). Russian Media and Influence Operations. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 85-98.
• Snyder, J. (2011). Cyber Warfare and Russian Strategies. Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(2), 341-362.
• Chandler, D. (2014). Soft Power and the New Public Diplomacy. Routledge.
• Berridge, G. (2015). Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hoffman, D., & Jamieson, R. (2018). Cultural Diplomacy in Russian Foreign Policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 24(4), 451-463.
• Karaganov, S. (2017). Russia’s Strategy of Influence. Russian International Affairs Council.
• Ulrichsen, K. C. (2019). Russia’s Approach to Cyber Warfare and Influence. Mediterranean Politics, 24(2), 265-281.