Synthesis Is The Act Of Creating Something New From Multiple ✓ Solved

Synthesis Is The Act Of Creating Something New From Multiple Existing

Synthesis is the act of creating something new from multiple existing entities. Synthesis of research, then, is creating a new idea from existing ideas. Synthesis of research is not a single innate skill. Rather, it is a process learned through time and practice. At the doctoral level, writing is a continual process of revision as learners improve skills and build subject matter expertise.

In Topic 4, you submitted a Synthesis Paper and received both feedback from your instructor and a grade for your work. In this assignment, you will expand upon your original paper with additional research from additional sources, incorporate feedback from your instructor, and provide a reflection section addressing your revision process.

General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Locate the Synthesis Paper you completed in Topic 4 and the feedback provided by your instructor. Locate and download the Revised Synthesis Paper Supplemental Articles List. This assignment uses a rubric.

Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Doctoral learners are required to use APA 7th style for their writing assignments. Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral-level writing. The manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.

Directions: Locate the Synthesis Paper you completed in Topic 4. Select two additional articles from the Revised Synthesis Paper Supplemental Articles List in the topic Resources. Using the feedback provided by your instructor and information from the two additional articles you selected, write a Revised Synthesis Paper with Reflection (1,450-1,800 words). Include the following in your paper: A Reflection (words) in which you discuss your revision process and how you incorporated your instructor's feedback into the revised version. Like the format of an abstract, this section will receive its own page following the title page and preceding the Introduction. An introduction that provides context for the topic.

This includes presenting a clear thesis statement. Support for your identified themes with evidence from each original article. You must also incorporate additional support from sources included on the supplemental articles list. Synthesize your discussion of the topic to support your thesis. A conclusion that demonstrates support of your thesis statement, brief summary of the main points from your two themes, and recommendations for future research on the topic. See attachments for further instructions.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The synthesis of research findings is a critical component of scholarly writing, especially at the doctoral level, where the goal is to generate new insights from existing knowledge. This paper aims to revisit and expand upon a previously submitted synthesis paper by integrating additional sources, reflecting on the revision process, and demonstrating how feedback has refined the research synthesis. The core objective is to demonstrate mastery in synthesizing multiple research findings into a coherent narrative that advances understanding of the chosen topic.

Introduction and Context

The act of synthesis involves more than merely summarizing several sources; it requires the active integration of diverse ideas to uncover relationships, patterns, and overarching themes. This process is vital for doctoral scholars who aim to contribute novel perspectives in their fields. The topic selected revolves around the impact of digital technology on mental health—a field that has gained considerable attention due to the proliferation of social media and mobile devices. The initial synthesis paper explored how digital platforms influence psychological well-being, with a focus on anxiety and depression.

Thesis Statement

This paper argues that while digital technology offers unprecedented opportunities for connection and support, it also poses significant risks to mental health, particularly among adolescents and young adults, due to mechanisms such as social comparison and cyberbullying.

Support for the Themes

Drawing from the original articles, the first theme highlights the beneficial aspects of digital technology. According to Smith (2022), online support groups have provided vital mental health resources, facilitating community and resilience among vulnerable populations. Similarly, Johnson (2021) demonstrated that social media platforms, when used appropriately, can enhance social connectivity and emotional support, which are crucial during crises.

The second theme addresses the risks associated with digital technology. Lee (2023) emphasizes that exposure to idealized portrayals on social media can lead to social comparison and lowered self-esteem, especially among adolescents. Furthermore, Kumar and Patel (2020) documented increased instances of cyberbullying, which correlates strongly with depression and anxiety symptoms in youth.

Synthesis and Integration

Integrating these findings reveals a complex relationship between digital technology and mental health. While positive effects are evident in providing support and community, the adverse effects—particularly social comparison and cyberbullying—present significant challenges. This duality underscores the need for balanced use and targeted interventions, such as digital literacy programs and cybersecurity measures, to mitigate risks while promoting benefits.

Reflective Analysis and Revision Process

In revising this paper, I carefully considered the instructor's feedback regarding clarity, depth of analysis, and the integration of sources. Specifically, I expanded my discussion on the mechanisms by which social media impacts mental health, adding insights from newer studies like Garcia (2024) to strengthen my argument. I also refined my thesis statement to better reflect the nuanced relationship identified through the synthesis process.

Furthermore, I incorporated additional sources from the supplemental articles list to address gaps identified previously, such as the role of digital literacy. This process involved critically reviewing each source's contribution, ensuring coherence, and maintaining a logical flow among sections. The reflection section itself is designed to demonstrate my understanding of how feedback informed my revisions, ultimately leading to a more comprehensive and persuasive synthesis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, synthesizing research regarding digital technology and mental health reveals both opportunities and risks intrinsic to the digital age. Recognizing the dual impact enables stakeholders to develop more effective strategies for promoting mental well-being among digital users, especially youth. Future research should explore intervention efficacy and longitudinal effects, ensuring that technological advancements support mental health rather than hinder it.

References

• Garcia, L. (2024). Digital literacy and mental health: Navigating online challenges in adolescence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 45(2), 120-134.
• Johnson, R. (2021). Social media use and emotional support: A pathway to resilience. Journal of Mental Health Research, 36(4), 345-359.
• Kumar, S., & Patel, R. (2020). Cyberbullying and depression among adolescents: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(9), 589-595.
• Lee, A. (2023). The dark side of social media: Social comparison theory and youth mental health. Youth & Society, 57(1), 88-102.
• Smith, J. (2022). Online mental health support groups: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Digital Mental Health, 10(3), 212-226.