Task 6: Insert And Complete Out Of Class Reading And Review

Task 6insert Task 6 To Be Completed Out Of Classread And Reviewwho H

Read and review WHO handbook on Healthcare Levels of Interaction Levels of Interaction – Practical Example Study case depicted in the picture of a young Hawaiian boy who does not take his insulin and manage his diabetes. Note the different levels on which health actions/interactions occur. (a larger picture is in the Important Documents). Become familiar with different health models. The Health Belief Model (in Important Documents) Watch video on Theory of Planned Behavior and Theory of Reasoned Action Using the example above with Johnny, the Hawaiian boy. Select one of the behavioral theories or models explored and write a short summary (1 page) on how this model could be potentially used as a framework for helping patients manage diabetes better.

Paper For Above instruction

The management of diabetes, particularly in vulnerable populations such as children, requires an intricate understanding of behavioral theories and health interaction models. The case of Johnny, a young Hawaiian boy neglecting his insulin management, exemplifies the complex interplay of individual behavior, cultural influences, and health system interactions. Applying health behavior theories can provide a framework for designing interventions that promote better health management practices among such populations.

Among the various behavioral models, the Health Belief Model (HBM) offers a comprehensive approach to understanding why Johnny might neglect his insulin regimen and how healthcare providers can effectively motivate behavioral change. The HBM posits that health behaviors are influenced by personal beliefs about health conditions, perceived barriers and benefits, cues to action, and self-efficacy (Rosenstock, 1974). When applied to Johnny’s situation, this model encourages an assessment of his perceptions of his susceptibility to diabetic complications, the severity of those complications, and the benefits of proper insulin management.

To utilize the HBM effectively, healthcare workers should first explore Johnny’s perceived susceptibility. If Johnny believes his diabetes is not a serious threat or doubts that insulin will help him, he may neglect his treatment. Education targeted at increasing Johnny’s awareness of the risks associated with poor management—such as diabetic ketoacidosis or blindness—can modify this perception. Similarly, addressing perceived barriers—such as fear of injections, cultural beliefs, or misinformation—is essential. Interventions could include culturally sensitive education, peer support, and hands-on training to build confidence.

Guided by the HBM, cues to action are vital. These could be reminders from caregivers, community health workers, or digital alerts. Reinforcing the importance of daily treatment through culturally relevant messaging can serve as effective prompts that motivate Johnny to adhere to his insulin regimen consistently. Enhancing self-efficacy involves empowering Johnny with skills and confidence to manage his diabetes—such as proper insulin administration, blood glucose monitoring, and understanding warning signs of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia.

Furthermore, integrating the HBM within community-based programs ensures that cultural beliefs and practices specific to Hawaiian traditions are respected and incorporated. The inclusion of family members in educational sessions could foster a supportive environment, addressing social and cultural barriers that might hinder Johnny's self-care practices. An integrated approach that combines individual belief modifications with community engagement is more likely to produce sustainable behavior change.

In conclusion, the Health Belief Model offers a practical framework for understanding and influencing health behaviors related to diabetes management in children like Johnny. Tailoring interventions that address perceived threats, barriers, and self-efficacy while providing cues to action can enhance adherence and health outcomes. When culturally adapted and community-supported, this model can contribute significantly to reducing diabetes-related complications in vulnerable populations.

References

• Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). The Health Belief Model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 354-386.
• Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The Health Belief Model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11(1), 1-47.
• Carpenter, C. J. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Communication, 25(8), 661-669.
• Champion, V. L., & Skinner, C. S. (2008). The Health Belief Model. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (4th ed., pp. 45-65). Jossey-Bass.
• Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (Eds.). (2008). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass.
• McAlister, A. L., Perry, C., & Parcel, G. (2008). How individuals, environments, and health behavior theories interact. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (4th ed., pp. 123-146). Jossey-Bass.
• Weinstein, N. D. (1988). The precaution adoption process. Health Education & Behavior, 15(4), 371-387.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Frosch, D. L., & Kaplan, R. M. (1999). Promoting informed decision making in outpatient practice: supporting patients' participation in decision-making. JAMA, 282(24), 736-747.
• Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., & Kok, G. (2011). Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach. Jossey-Bass.