Task Name Phase 2 Individual Project Deliverable Leng 256549

Tasknamephase 2 Individual Projectdeliverable Length7501000 Words

Create, describe, and explain the type of fictional public organization. Describe some of the main services, products, and activities the organization provides to the public. You may not use the same fictional organization as was used in the previous Week's Individual Project. How significant is the corruption problem in your organization? Explain in detail.

How long has the corruption problem been present in your organization? Explain in detail. How long will it take to conduct the performance evaluation? Explain why. What will the evaluation assess with regard to the organizational leadership? Explain in detail. What outcomes do you propose the evaluation will help to achieve for the organization? Why? Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

Paper For Above instruction

In recent years, concerns about organizational integrity and accountability have gained prominence, particularly within public institutions where transparency is essential for public trust. This paper proposes a performance evaluation plan for a fictional public health organization, the City Healthcare Outreach Agency (CHOA). CHOA is a governmental agency responsible for providing essential health services, health education, and preventive care to underserved urban populations. The organization’s core functions include operating clinics, running awareness campaigns, and offering vaccination programs. Its mission is to ensure equitable access to health services and improve community health outcomes, especially among vulnerable populations such as low-income families, the elderly, and individuals with chronic illnesses.

Description of the Organization

CHOA primarily serves the urban areas of a large metropolitan city, where socio-economic disparities significantly impact health outcomes. Its services encompass primary care consultations, immunization drives, maternal and child health programs, health screenings, and health education workshops. The agency’s facilities are spread across multiple districts to ensure accessible healthcare for all residents. CHOA also collaborates with local non-profits, community groups, and government departments to expand its reach and effectiveness.

The organization employs healthcare professionals, administrative staff, community health workers, and volunteers. Its activities include clinic operations, health outreach events, vaccination campaigns, and educational seminars. These efforts are funded through public funds, grants, and partnerships with nonprofit organizations. Overall, CHOA plays a crucial role in maintaining public health standards and preventing disease outbreaks within the city.

Despite its mission-driven focus, CHOA has been marred by a significant corruption issue involving the embezzlement of funds by certain personnel. Recent investigations reveal that a group of mid-level managers colluded to divert public funds allocated for vaccination and health outreach programs into personal bank accounts. This corruption has compromised program delivery, reduced resource availability, and eroded public confidence in the agency.

The extent of the problem is substantial; internal reports suggest that approximately 15% of allocated funds over the past two years were siphoned off through complex laundering schemes. The affected stakeholders include vulnerable community members who rely on free or subsidized health services, taxpayers, government oversight agencies, and the integrity of public health initiatives. The corruption has persisted for over three years, gradually escalating as the funds diverted were increasingly needed for operational costs, staff salaries, and program expansion.

Duration and Conduct of the Performance Evaluation

The performance evaluation is projected to take approximately three months to complete. This timeframe accounts for the comprehensive data collection required, including interviews, financial audits, and review of organizational records. Given the complexity of corruption issues, thorough investigation and stakeholder engagement are necessary to ensure accurate assessment and to develop viable recommendations.

The evaluation’s scope will include an analysis of organizational processes, financial controls, leadership accountability, and the effectiveness of existing management strategies. It will especially focus on the leadership’s role in establishing a corruption-sensitive environment, their oversight of financial processes, and their response to early warning signs of fraud. This detailed assessment aims to identify weaknesses in governance structures and suggest improvements to prevent future misconduct.

Assessment of Organizational Leadership

The evaluation will scrutinize the leadership’s role in promoting ethical standards and accountability. It will assess whether leaders have established clear policies, transparent procedures, and regular oversight mechanisms. Furthermore, it will explore the leadership’s responsiveness to internal reports of misconduct and their commitment to fostering an organizational culture of integrity.

Specific indicators such as leadership communication, staff training on ethics, implementation of internal audits, and whistleblower protections will be examined. An emphasis will be placed on evaluating whether leadership actively promotes transparency and takes prompt corrective actions when misconduct is identified. This assessment aims to determine if leadership practices inadvertently facilitated or failed to prevent the ongoing corruption problem.

Proposed Outcomes of the Evaluation

The primary goal of the performance evaluation is to identify systemic weaknesses that enable corruption and to develop targeted recommendations for strengthening governance. It aims to establish effective internal controls, enhance transparency, and foster a culture of accountability within CHOA. A key outcome is the implementation of robust financial management protocols, including regular audits, staff training, and whistleblower protections.

Another anticipated outcome is improved leadership practices, emphasizing ethical conduct and proactive oversight. The evaluation's findings will assist in designing policies that minimize opportunities for corruption, thereby restoring public trust and ensuring that resources are utilized effectively for community health benefits.

Long-term, this evaluation will support organizational resilience by embedding integrity into its operational framework. Strengthening trust in public health agencies is essential for maintaining community engagement and ensuring the success of ongoing health initiatives. The lessons learned from this evaluation can serve as a model for similar organizations facing corruption challenges, fostering a culture of transparency and accountability that ultimately advances public health objectives.

References

• Austin, J. & Jones, L. (2018). Public Sector Ethics: Cases and Commentary. Routledge.
• Bovens, M., et al. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford University Press.
• Farazmand, A. (2016). Administrative Ethics and Integrity in Public Service. Administration & Society, 48(5), 546-567.
• Kettl, D. F. (2015). The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for the 21st Century. Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Moore, M. H. (2014). Recognizing Public Value. Stanford University Press.
• Peters, B. G. (2017). Governance and Administration. Routledge.
• Rainey, H. G. (2014). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. Jossey-Bass.
• Rubin, H. (2015). Ethical Leadership in Public Organizations. Routledge.
• Shah, A. (2018). Public Sector Governance and Accountability: Issues and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(12), 1069-1080.
• Wilkins, L. (2019). Managing Organizational Integrity: Strategies for Ethical Transformation. Sage Publications.