TCM 701 1 Selection Homework Exercise 21: What Are Constrain

Tcm 701 1selection Homework Exercise 21 What Are Constraints

Determine the project priority matrix for each case. Review the case and determine whether each project constraint (cost, time, scope) should be: • Constrained • Enhanced • Accepted Produce a table or short statement justifying each constraint for each case.

Case 1: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is a scientific federal agency researching the conditions of the oceans and atmosphere. With origins dating to 1807, NOAA is best known for weather forecasting provided by the National Weather Service. NOAA announced a $5.7 million research program for improving hazardous and extreme weather condition forecasting including a project to determine the origins of tornado rotation.

Case 2: The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, created the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women by setting and enforcing standards and providing training, outreach, and education. Of the 4,679 fatal workplace injuries reported in 2014, 403 were homicides. OSHA is funding a $2.4 million research grant to determine the origins, preventive programs, and workforce training needed to address violence in the workplace.

Case 3: AT&T is one of the largest telecommunications companies in the world providing data management, mobile phone, entertainment content, and traditional local and long-distance phone service. The acquisition of DIRECTV fulfills the company’s goal to provide entertainment content to all of North America. The implementation now involves a project to integrate AT&T’s UVERSE internet-based feed with DIRECTV’s satellite feed into a common service package for all customers.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of managing projects effectively necessitates a precise understanding of constraints and their prioritization within project management frameworks. Constraints such as scope, time, and cost are fundamental elements that influence project success, and their prioritization varies based on specific project contexts and organizational goals. This essay evaluates the constraints within three distinct cases—NOAA’s weather forecasting initiative, OSHA’s workplace violence prevention research, and AT&T’s integration project for entertainment services—using the project priority matrix methodology. It classifies each constraint as constrained, enhanced, or accepted, providing justifications aligned with project objectives and stakeholder expectations.

Case 1: NOAA Weather Forecasting Program

In NOAA’s case, the primary goal is to enhance weather forecasting capabilities, which are critical for public safety and disaster preparedness. The project’s scope involves researching the origins of tornado rotation, funded with $5.7 million. Given the societal importance and regulatory expectations, the schedule is relatively flexible but timeliness in weather prediction is vital. Therefore, the constraints are prioritized as follows: the scope is constrained, to ensure that the research results are comprehensive and reliable; the time constraint is also constrained to meet weather alerts’ critical timelines; and the cost is accepted within the allocated budget, with emphasis on maintaining research quality. The justification emphasizes that public safety and accuracy in weather prediction cannot be compromised, thus necessitating tight control over scope and schedule, with budget considerations accepting necessary trade-offs.

Case 2: OSHA Workplace Violence Research

OSHA’s project aims to ascertain the origins of workplace violence, which involves developing preventive programs and workforce training. The funding of $2.4 million reflects resource limits, but the societal impact of reducing workplace homicides makes scope flexibility crucial. Here, the scope is constrained to ensure focused research on violence origins, while the schedule is also constrained to address urgent safety concerns. The budget is enhanced to allow for comprehensive data collection and training development, recognizing that increased investment can improve outcomes. The justification lies in balancing societal safety priorities with budgetary constraints, accepting moderate scope and schedule constraints while leveraging additional funds to enhance research depth and training quality.

Case 3: AT&T’s Integration of UVERSE and DIRECTV Services

The AT&T project involves integrating internet-based UVERSE with satellite-based DIRECTV services to deliver a unified entertainment package. Given the competitive nature of the telecommunications industry and customer expectations, the scope is constrained to deliver a functional, integrated service. The schedule is constrained to meet market demands and competitive pressures, ensuring timely deployment. The budget, however, is enhanced to accommodate technical complexities and vendor collaborations, recognizing that additional investment can expedite development and assure quality. The justification emphasizes that technological integration and market responsiveness justify constraining scope and schedule but enhancing budget to reduce risks and improve the product’s quality and customer satisfaction.

Conclusion

In project management, the prioritization of project constraints—scope, time, and cost—is vital for aligning project deliverables with organizational goals and stakeholder expectations. The case studies illustrate that constraints must be carefully classified as constrained, enhanced, or accepted based on context, societal impact, and competitive pressures. A deliberate approach to managing these constraints enhances project success and stakeholder satisfaction by ensuring that critical project elements receive appropriate focus and resources.

References

• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
• Meredith, J. R., & Shafer, S. M. (2017). Project Management: A Strategic Managerial Approach. Wiley.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Levin, G. (2015). Constraints and Prioritization in Project Management. Journal of Project Engineering, 12(3), 45-56.
• Lock, D. (2013). Project Management. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
• Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2017). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Jeston, J., & Nelis, J. (2014). Business Process Management. Routledge.
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management JumpStart. Wiley.
• Harrison, F. (2015). Managing Constraints in Complex Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 820-833.