Team Assignments: Susan's Consulting Company SCC Problem Ove

Team Assignmentsusans Consulting Company Scc Problem Overviewcompa

Susans Consulting Company (SCC) has been in business for ten years and has experienced significant turnover in its project management group. A review by senior leadership revealed that project managers are frustrated with the extensive documentation requirements, which impair their ability to manage projects effectively. Additionally, SCC's overhead costs for projects, including project management expenses, account for 30-40% of total project budgets, exceeding industry standards by 15-25%. Projects are frequently over budget by 25-50% and are delivered late 95% of the time. SCC has requested the development of a new project management process that can track issues, risks, and changes; provide visibility into project activities; and display project costs comprehensively. Furthermore, SCC expects your team to manage a sample project using this new process, which involves nine applications with specified costs and income over five years, and a required return rate of 10%. The assignment encompasses evaluating and designing a methodology, applying it to manage the project, and presenting a comprehensive report that covers process development, risk assessment, stakeholder analysis, timeline strategies, and organizational structure, formatted according to APA standards.

Paper For Above instruction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of project management, organizations like Susans Consulting Company (SCC) confront persistent challenges surrounding overhead costs, project delays, and budget overruns. Addressing these issues requires not only the redesign of project management processes but also the strategic application of sound methodologies, organizational structures, and risk mitigation practices. This paper presents an integrated approach to developing a new project management methodology and applying it to a complex project involving nine applications over five years, with detailed analysis and strategic planning.

Introduction

SCC’s difficulties—excessive overhead costs, frequent delays, and budget overruns—highlight the need for a systematic overhaul of its project management practices. Traditional processes, heavily burdened by documentation, hinder project managers’ effectiveness, prompting a shift toward streamlined, value-driven methodologies. The goal is to create a process that enhances visibility, control, and decision-making, while minimizing unnecessary overhead. This paper outlines the methodology development, project planning, organizational structure, stakeholder engagement, risk management, and timeline strategies necessary to achieve these objectives.

Developing a New Project Management Methodology

The foundation of an effective project management approach lies in selecting a methodology that aligns with organizational goals and project characteristics. For SCC, an iterative, hybrid Agile-Waterfall methodology is suitable. This combines the structure and predictability of Waterfall with the flexibility of Agile, allowing for adaptability throughout project execution. The narrative of this methodology emphasizes stakeholder collaboration, continuous improvement, and transparent reporting.

A pictorial representation (see Figure 1) illustrates cycles of planning, execution, monitoring, and control, integrated with iterative review points—enabling early detection of issues and swift responses. Key deliverables for this process include project charters, risk registers, change logs, issue logs, project schedules, cost estimates, and progress reports. Regular reviews ensure alignment with objectives and facilitate adjustments.

The review and update process involves quarterly evaluations of process effectiveness, incorporating lessons learned and feedback from project teams. This fosters a culture of continuous improvement and ensures the methodology remains aligned with organizational needs.

Prioritization Techniques and Risk Considerations

Effective prioritization is vital for resource allocation and project success. Techniques such as Present Value (PV), Net Present Value (NPV), and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) help prioritize applications based on financial metrics. Dot voting offers a collaborative approach to stakeholder-driven prioritization, fostering consensus.

Risks in developing and implementing the new methodology include:

• Resistance to change — impacting adoption and compliance.
• Process complexity — potentially overwhelming team members and affecting efficiency.
• Inadequate stakeholder engagement — leading to misaligned expectations.
• Insufficient training — hindering proper implementation.
• Technological issues — affecting data accuracy and tracking capabilities.

Each risk is categorized (e.g., organizational, technical), assessed for impact and probability, and mitigated through strategies like comprehensive training, stakeholder communication, pilot testing, and continuous monitoring.

Organizational Structure for the Methodology

An optimal organizational structure for the new methodology features a centralized Project Management Office (PMO) overseeing process adherence and continuous improvement, supported by dedicated project teams. The structure fosters clear roles—project managers, team leads, stakeholders—and facilitates effective communication channels. A pictorial diagram (see Figure 2) illustrates this hierarchical model, emphasizing the flow of information, decision-making authority, and accountability.

Application Management Using the New Methodology

Applying the methodology begins with comprehensive requirements elicitation through stakeholder interviews, workshops, and documentation review. Decomposing requirements involves creating a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), subdividing projects into manageable deliverables and activities, including project management tasks such as scheduling and risk tracking.

A Project Overview Statement consolidates scope, objectives, milestones, and constraints, serving as a reference for all stakeholders. The WBS explicitly outlines project deliverables, technical activities, and project management components, ensuring clarity.

Developing a Gantt chart with estimates—using optimistic, pessimistic, and most-likely durations—for each application provides a visual schedule. Strategies to reduce the timeline from typical durations to 12 months include accelerating critical tasks, overlapping phases, resource leveling, and implementing stringent scope controls.

A team agreement establishes communication norms, decision-making processes, and conflict resolution protocols, enhancing team cohesion. Prioritizing applications using the established techniques and stakeholder input ensures resource focus aligns with strategic value.

The organizational structure depicted previously guides project execution, clarifying roles and responsibilities. Identifying stakeholders—such as sponsors, customers, vendors, regulatory bodies, and end-users—enables proactive engagement and support.

Risk management involves cataloging threats and opportunities, assessing their likelihood and impact, and crafting mitigation or exploitation strategies. Risks such as technological failure, scope creep, resource shortages, and market changes are systematically addressed.

Finally, ongoing revenue assessment relies on performance metrics, earned value management, and post-implementation reviews to ensure projects deliver expected financial returns and strategic benefits.

Conclusion

Transforming SCC’s project management process necessitates a tailored methodology emphasizing transparency, efficiency, and stakeholder collaboration. The hybrid approach, supported by a clear organizational structure, prioritized resource allocation, and robust risk management, will enable SCC to reduce overhead costs, improve project delivery timeliness, and stay within budget. Implementing these strategies fosters a culture of continuous improvement, ensuring sustainable project success aligned with organizational objectives.

References

• Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). PMI.
• Kerzner, H. (2013). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• Archibald, R. D. (2003). Managing High-Technology Programs and Projects. Wiley.
• Edwards, M., & Bowen, P. (2018). Agile project management techniques in practice. International Journal of Project Management, 36(5), 678-688.
• Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2017). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Heldman, K. (2018). PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. Sybex.
• Meredith, J. R., & Shafer, S. M. (2013). Operations Management for MBAs. Wiley.
• Sue, I., & Long, T. (2020). Cost management strategies for project success. Journal of Management Development, 39(4), 419-431.
• Keel, R. (2006). An Introduction to Project Management. PMI.
• Heldman, K. (2018). PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide. Wiley.