Teams Consist Of Two Or More People Who Work Interdependentl
Teams Consist Of Two Or More People Who Work Interdependently To Accom
Teams consist of two or more people who work interdependently to accomplish some task related to purpose and are important to organizational life. Describe the type of teams that are present in your organization. What level of interdependence do these teams share? How do these team characteristics influence the level of organizational performance and commitment? Team processes consist of communication, activities, and interactions that occur within teams as they pursue goals and accomplish tasks.
Describe taskwork and teamwork processes and give examples of each in your selected organization. What factors influence the communication process within the teams you have observed? What recommendations would you have to improve team processes within your organization?
Paper For Above instruction
In contemporary organizations, teams are fundamental units of productivity and innovation, with their structure, interdependence, and processes directly impacting organizational success. In my organization, primarily project teams, cross-functional teams, and leadership teams are prevalent, each with varying degrees of interdependence that influence their effectiveness and the overall performance.
Types of Teams Present in the Organization
Project teams are formed to achieve specific objectives within a designated timeframe. These teams are often composed of members from diverse functional backgrounds to leverage a broad range of skills. Cross-functional teams comprise employees from different departments working collaboratively to achieve strategic objectives, fostering innovation and comprehensive problem-solving. Leadership teams, including managers and executives, collaborate to guide organizational strategy and coordinate efforts across units.
Level of Interdependence in These Teams
The interdependence within these teams varies significantly. Project teams generally exhibit sequential interdependence, where one member's output serves as a prerequisite for another's task, fostering a chain of collaboration. Cross-functional teams display pooled interdependence, sharing resources and information to meet common goals but maintaining individual accountability. Leadership teams demonstrate reciprocal interdependence, with members engaging in ongoing, mutual interactions essential for strategic decision-making.
Impact of Team Characteristics on Organizational Performance and Commitment
The degree of interdependence among teams directly affects organizational performance. High interdependence necessitates effective communication, coordination, and trust among team members, which, if managed well, can lead to enhanced performance and innovation. Conversely, poorly coordinated interdependent teams may face delays and conflicts, diminishing organizational efficiency. These team characteristics also influence organizational commitment; when teams work cohesively and members experience a shared sense of purpose, commitment levels increase, fostering employee engagement and reducing turnover.
Taskwork and Teamwork Processes
Taskwork processes refer to the technical activities and work procedures involved in accomplishing a team's objectives. In my organization, an example of taskwork is the development of a new product prototype, which involves research, design, testing, and refinement activities. Teamwork processes encompass the social activities that facilitate coordination and cohesion, such as communication, conflict resolution, and mutual support. For instance, regular team meetings to update progress, share feedback, and address challenges exemplify teamwork processes.
Factors Influencing Communication within Teams
Effective communication is vital for successful team functioning. Factors influencing communication include team diversity, technological tools, organizational culture, and leadership styles. In my organization, cultural diversity can create communication barriers due to different language proficiencies and communication styles. Technological tools like collaborative platforms enhance information sharing but can also lead to information overload if not managed properly. Organizational culture that values open communication facilitates transparency and trust, whereas hierarchical cultures may inhibit free exchange of ideas.
Recommendations to Improve Team Processes
To enhance team processes, several strategies are advisable. First, promoting a culture of open communication and psychological safety encourages members to voice ideas and concerns without fear of retribution. Second, investing in training programs on effective communication and conflict resolution can improve collaboration. Third, implementing structured meeting protocols and utilizing technology effectively can streamline information sharing. Additionally, fostering team-building activities can strengthen interpersonal relationships, thereby increasing trust and cohesion.
Conclusion
In summary, the organization hosts various teams with differing levels of interdependence that significantly influence performance and commitment. Understanding and optimizing taskwork and teamwork processes, along with addressing factors that affect communication, are essential for enhancing overall organizational effectiveness. By fostering a supportive culture, leveraging appropriate technological tools, and implementing targeted interventions, organizations can improve team functioning and achieve strategic goals more efficiently.
References
- Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business School Press.
- Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of teams' work processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356-376.
- LePine, J. A., & Van Vugt, M. (2017). Teams. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 426-453). Wiley.
- Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a "big five" in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599.
- Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Ramshaw, G. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to normative models of team performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
- Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Harvard Business Press.
- Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
- Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
- Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282.
- West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680–693.